基于环境审计的节能减排规制模型

运筹与管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 249-256.

• 管理科学 • 上一篇

基于环境审计的节能减排规制模型

黄溶冰¹, 李玉辉², 陈耿¹

1.南京审计学院国际审计学院,江苏南京 210029;
2.郑州大学商学院,河南郑州 450001

收稿日期:2012-10-22 出版日期:2014-01-25
作者简介:黄溶冰(1972-),男,博士,教授,研究方向:可持续发展、系统工程理论与方法;李玉辉(1962-),男,博士,教授,研究方向:管理信息化。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目《我国节能减排的环境审计规制研究(11BGL062)》;国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271117);教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(10YJC790098);江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(11KJA630001)

Environmental Audit-Based Model on the Regulation of the Energy Saving andEmission Reduction

HUANG Rong-bing¹, LI Yu-hui², CHEN Geng¹

1. School of International Audit, Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 210029, China;
2. School of Business, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received:2012-10-22 Online:2014-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为考察环境审计在节能减排中的规制效果,本文设计了两个参与人三种情境下的博弈模型,(1)监管者介入公司环境审计报告、无条件处罚,(2)监管者不介入公司环境审计报告、无条件处罚,(3)监管者介入公司环境审计报告,有条件处罚。研究结果表明,审计报告的介入权为公司开展环境审计提供了正向激励;公司因努力改善环境而减轻处罚的有条件处罚机制增加了公司环境审计的倾向性。本文的研究发现为环境审计制度设计提供了理论基础。

关键词: 节能减排, 环境审计, 博弈模型, 介入权, 有条件处罚

Abstract: In order to inspect the environmental audit’s regulation effect on the energy saving and emission reduction, the paper designs the two-person game models under three situations: (1)the supervisor gets involved in the company’s environmental audit report, unconditional punishment. (2)the supervisor doesn’t get involved in the company’s environmental audit report, unconditional punishment. (3)the supervisor gets involved in the company’s environmental audit report, conditional punishment. The study results show that the intervention right of the audit report provides the company with positive incentive to carry out the environmental audit. The conditional punishment mechanism, that is, the company’s efforts to improve the environment can reduce the punishment and increase the tendentiousness of the company’s environmental audit. The findings of the paper provide the environmental audit system with the theoretical foundation.

Key words: environmental audit, energy saving and emission reduction, game model, intervention right, conditional punishment

中图分类号:

黄溶冰, 李玉辉, 陈耿. 基于环境审计的节能减排规制模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(1): 249-256.

HUANG Rong-bing, LI Yu-hui, CHEN Geng. Environmental Audit-Based Model on the Regulation of the Energy Saving andEmission Reduction[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(1): 249-256.

参考文献

[1] Hillary R. Environmental auditing: concepts, methods and developments[J]. International Journal of Auditing, 1998, (2): 71-85.
[2] Lighbody M. Environmental auditing: the audit theory gap[J]. Accounting Forum, 2000, 24,(2): 151-169.
[3] Hillary R. Corporate environmental management attitudes[J]. Integration Environmental Management, 1992, (7): 10-12.
[4] Dixon R, Mousa A G, Woodhead D A. The necessary characteristics of environmental auditors: a review of the contribution of the financial auditing profession[J]. Accounting Forum, 2004, 28: 119-138.
[5] Lehman G. Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1999, 24: 217-241.
[6] Gray R. Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: a review and comment[J]. International Journal of Auditing, 2000, 4: 247-268.
[7] Schaltegger, S, Stinson C H. Issues and research opportunities in environmental accounting[C]. WWZ Discussion Papers No.9423. Basel, Switzerland: Universitit Basel, 15, 1994.
[8] Hill C. The role of internal auditors in environmental lssues. altamonte springs[C]. FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation,6, 1993.
[9] Innes R. Violator avoidance activities and self-reporting in optimal law enforcement[J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2001,17: 239-256.
[10] Fryxell G E, Chung S S, Carlos W H. Does the selection of ISO 14001 registrars matter? registrar reputation and environmental policy statements in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 71: 45-57.
[11] Lewis L. Environmental audits in local government: a useful means to progress in sustainable development[J]. Accounting Forum, 2000, 24, (3): 296-317.
[12] Stafford L S. State adoption of environmental audit initiatives[J]. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2006, 24(1): 172-187.
[13] Moore J R. Protection will increase compliance[J]. The Environmental Forum, 1992, 9(1): 39-41.
[14] Campbell S N, Byington J R. Environmental auditing: an environmental management tool[J]. Internal Auditing, 1995, 11(2): 9-18.
[15] Collison D, Slomp S. Environmental accounting, auditing and reporting in europe: the role of FEE[J]. The European Accounting Review, 2000, 9(1): 111-129.
[16] Mishra K B, Newman D P, Stinson H C. Environmental regulations and incentives for compliance audits[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1997,16: 187-214.
[17] Desgagné B S, Gabel H L. Environmental auditing in management systems and public policy[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997, 33: 331-346.
[18] Darnall N, Seol I, Sarkis J. Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations'use of environmental audits[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2009, 34: 170-187.
[19] 黄溶冰,赵谦.环境审计在太湖水污染治理中的实现机制与路径创新[J].中国软科学,2010,(10):66-73,151.
[20] 黄溶冰,王丽艳.环境审计在碳减排中的应用:案例与启示[J].中央财经大学学报,2011,(8):86-90

基于环境审计的节能减排规制模型

Environmental Audit-Based Model on the Regulation of the Energy Saving andEmission Reduction

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宋兆宇, 孙秉珍, 赵可彤. 线性需求供应链中供应商参股制造商的定价与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 166-171.
[2]	郑敏娜, 任广乾. 企业绿色创新行为的演化博弈分析——基于环保社会组织参与的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 15-21.
[3]	单而芳, 曾晗, 蔡蕾. 互联网租车市场的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 12-19.
[4]	姜明, 李洪心, 刘德海. 基于电子商务B2B平台的个性化定制产品供应链治理结构重复博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 45-51.
[5]	丁黎黎, 杨颖, 王伟, 王卓. 合作创新是否真的助力企业节能减排？[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 230-239.
[6]	熊国强, 张毅. 考虑情绪因素的城市拆迁RDEU博弈模型与系统脆性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 99-106.
[7]	史思雨,孙静春. 基于不同融资方式的双渠道供应链定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 1-8.
[8]	朱庆华, 李幻云. 基于政府干预的报废汽车回收博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(10): 33-39.
[9]	徐辉, 林丽琼, 谭忠富. 地源热泵全寿命周期节能减排技术经济模型及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(2): 159-167.
[10]	刘惠敏, 陈坤韡. FIDIC合同条件下工程索赔的博弈模型^*[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7): 39-47.
[11]	马翔, 张国兴. 基于非对称演化博弈的京冀雾霾协同治理联盟稳定性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(5): 45-52.
[12]	熊国强,刘西. 情绪影响下选时博弈模型及其最优策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 140-145.
[13]	孙冰, 姚洪涛. 全球化背景下核型创新网络竞争机制研究——基于改进LV-EG模型的仿真分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(1): 192-202.
[14]	魏亚楠, 牛东晓. 基于KKT和量子遗传算法的风火电联合上网最优决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(2): 105-110.