运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 227-232.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0103

• 管理科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑层次结构的独立董事治理多优势评价方法

杨锴1,2, 赵希男3, 周岩3   

  1. 1.南京信息工程大学 商学院,江苏 南京 210044;
    2.南京信息工程大学 江苏人才强省建设研究基地,江苏 南京 210044;
    3.东北大学 工商管理学院,辽宁 沈阳 110167
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-24 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-04-12
  • 作者简介:杨锴(1989-),男,江苏新沂人,博士,讲师,研究方向为独立董事治理和系统评价;赵希男(1960-),男,上海人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为系统评价和战略管理;周岩(1978-),男,河南洛阳人,博士研究生,副教授,研究方向为平台战略。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目(2020SJA0167);江苏省生产力学会2020年度开放课题(JSSCL2020B005);南京信息工程大学江苏人才强省建设研究基地课题(JSRC2021005)

An Evaluation Method of Multi-advantages for Independent Director Governance Based on the Hierarchical Structure

YANG Kai1,2, ZHAO Xi-nan3, ZHOU Yan3   

  1. 1. School of Business, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    2. Research Center for Prospering Jiangsu Province with Talents, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    3. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China
  • Received:2017-08-24 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-04-12

摘要: 针对企业治理中的独立董事治理优势评价问题,提出了一种考虑层次结构的独立董事治理多优势评价方法。该方法以竞优理论为基础,运用其中的个体优势判别方法确定层次结构下各独立董事治理的优势权重;依据确定的权重结果,逐层构建代理评价和民主评价模型,并计算不同层次的比较优势和团体优势;然后采用聚类分析方法提炼共性优势模式,获得该模式下的优势分布和结构;进一步通过求解模型确定独立董事治理的多项优势。此外,以A公司独立董事治理评价为例,证明了该方法的有效性和优越性。

关键词: 多优势评价, 层次结构, 独立董事治理, 评价方法

Abstract: In this research, an evaluation method for multi-advantages considering hierarchical structure is proposed to solve the independent director governance advantage assessment in corporate governance. In this method, firstly, the advantage weights of every independent director in hierarchical structure are set using the individual advantage identification method from the better action conforming to natural rules theory. Then, according to the results of weight, the individual agent assessment and democratic agent evaluation for every hierarchy are put forward, and at the same time competitive advantages and team advantages are calculated by thehierarchical model. Furthermore, the hierarchical clustering analysis of individual advantage identification results is carried out and the similar value parameters are clustered as the same class. The distribution and structure of the pattern are calculated in the light of value parameters. Moreover, the multi-advantage elements are determined by establishing and solving the advantage identification model. Finally, an example of independent directors from A company governance evaluation is used to justify the proposed method.

Key words: multi-advantages evaluation, hierarchical structure, independent director governance, evaluation method

中图分类号: