基于TPB模型的学术创业意向影响因素研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0266

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在知识型社会的背景之下,大学作为生产、传播、应用知识的组织,开始在社会与经济中发挥越来越大的作用。本文首先介绍了学术创业研究二十多年来的主要思想、研究方法与研究成果,并指出了现有研究的不足。随后,结合创业意向领域的现有研究,在传统的计划行为理论基础上进一步发展,探索近端预测因子和远端预测因子在学术创业意向模型中的影响作用。收集了105名受访学者数据,并使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型方法来检验所提出的理论模型假设,剖析了拥有能力感知和外部环境感知与TPB模型原有结构(即个人态度、主观规范、知觉行为控制和创业意向)之间的潜在影响关系。研究结果揭示了各因素之间的显著与非显著路径关系,以及直接与间接影响效果。

关键词: 创业意向, 学术创业, 计划行为理论, 偏最小二乘结构方程

Abstract: Under the background of knowledge-based society, university, as an organization of knowledge production, dissemination and application, starts to play a more and more important role in society and economy. Firstly, this paper introduces the main ideas, research methods and research results of academic entrepreneurship research in the past 20 years, and points out the shortcomings of the existing research. Then, combining with the existing research in the field of entrepreneurial intention, on the basis of traditional planned behavior theory, and we further developand explore the influence of proximal predictors and distal predictors on the academic entrepreneurial intention model. The data of 105 respondents are collected and the theoretical model assumptions are tested by using the partial least squares structural equation modeling method. The potential influence relationship between perception of the possession of competencies and perception of external environment and the original structure of TPB model (namely personal attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control and entrepreneurial intention) is analyzed. The results reveal the significant and non-significant path relationships among factors, as well as the direct and indirect effects.

Key words: entrepreneurial intention, academic entrepreneur, theory of planned behavior, partial least squares structural equation

中图分类号:

C939

茅路洒, 方文丽. 基于TPB模型的学术创业意向影响因素研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(8): 164-169.

MAO Lu-sa, FANG Wen-li. The Influencing Factors of Academic Entrepreneurial Intention Research Based on TPB Model[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(8): 164-169.

参考文献

[1] Etzkowitz H. Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 2003a, 42(3): 293-337.
[2] Klofsten M, Jones-Evans D. Comparing academic entrepreneurship in europe: the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 2000, 14(4): 299-309.
[3] Jacob M, Lundqvist M, Hellsmark H. Entrepreneurial transformations in the swedish university system: the case of chalmers university of technology. Research Policy, 2003, 32(9): 1555-1568.
[4] Abreu M, Grinevich V. The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 2013, 42(2): 408-422.
[5] 陈明哲.学术创业:动态竞争理论从无到有的历程简. 中大管理研究,2016,(3):1-16.
[6] Guerrero M, Urbano D, Cunningham J, Organ D. Entrepreneurial universities in two european regions: a case study comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39: 415-434.
[7] Urbano D, Guerrero M. Entrepreneurial universities: socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a european region. Economic Development Quarterly, 2013, 27(1): 40-55.
[8] Etzkowitz H. Research groups as Bquasi-firms: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 2003b, 32(1): 109-121.
[9] Rasmussen E. Understanding academic entrepreneurship: exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories. International Small Business Journal, 2011, 29(5): 448-471.
[10] Guerrero M, Urbano D, Cunningham J, Organ D. Entrepreneurial universities in two european regions: a case study comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39: 415-434.
[11] Tijssen R J W. Universities and industrially relevant science: towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy, 2006, 35(10): 1569-1585.
[12] Goethner M, Obschonka M, Silbereisen R K, Cantner U. Scientists' transition to academic entrepreneurship: economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2012, 33(3): 628-641.
[13] Ajzen I. Residual effects of past on later behavior: habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2002, 6: 107-122.
[14] Krueger N F, Jr Reilly M D, Carsrud A L. Competing models of entrepreneurial, 2000.
[15] Schlaegel C, Koenig M. Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, 38(2): 291-332.
[16] Heuer A, Kolvereid L. “Education in entrepreneurship and the theory of planned behaviour”, European Journal of Training and Development, 2014, 38(6): 506-523.
[17] Aldridge T T, Audretsch D B. The bayh-dole act and scientist entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 2011, 40(5): 1058-1067.
[18] Malebana J. EI of south african rural university students: a test of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 20.14, 6(2): 130-143.
[19] Goel R K, Göktepe-Hultén D, Ram R. Academics' entrepreneurship propensities and gender differences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2015, 40(1): 161-177.
[20] Ferreira J J, Raposo M L, Rodrigues R G, Dinis A, do Paço A. A model of entrepreneurial intention: an application of the psychological and behavioral approaches. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2012, 19(3): 424-440.
[21] Heuer A, Kolvereid L. “Education in entrepreneurship and the theory of planned behaviour”, European Journal of Training and Development, 2014, 38(6): 506-523.
[22] Schlaegel C, Koenig M. Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, 38(2): 291-332.
[23] Kautonen T, Van Gelderen M, Fink M. Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting EI and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, early view, 2013. 1-20.
[24] Van-Gelderen M, Brand M, Van Praag M, Bodewes W, Poutsma E, Van Gils A.“Explaining entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behaviour”, Career Development International, 2008, 13(6): 538-559.
[25] Kolvereid L, Isaksen E. New business start-up and subsequent entry into selfemployment. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21(6): 866-885.
[26] Kautonen T, Van Gelderen M, Fink M. Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting EI and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, early view, 2013. 1-20.
[27] Henry C, Hill F, Leitch C. Entrepreneurship education and training: Can entrepreneurship be taught? (Part 1). Education and Training, 2005, 47(2/3): 98-111.
[28] Rodrigues R, Raposo M, Ferreira J, Paço A. Entrepreneurship education and the propensity for business creation: testing a structural model. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2010, 9(1): 58-73.
[29] Franzoni C, Lissoni F. Academic entrepreneurs: critical issues and lessons for Europe. In Universities and Regional Economic Development, ed. A.Varga. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009.
[30] Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The influence of attitude on behaviours. In The Handbook of Attitudes, eds. D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson and M. P. Zanna. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2005. 173-221.
[31] Fini R, Grimaldi R, Marzocchi G L, Sobrero M. The determinants of corporate entrepreneurial intention within small and newly-established firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2012, 36(1): 387-414.
[32] Sanchez J C. The impact of an entrepreneurship education program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 2013, 51(3): 447-465.
[33] Liñn F, Urbano D, Guerrero M. Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: start-up intentions of university students in spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2011, 23(3/4): 187-215.
[34] Toole A A, Czarnitzki D. Commercializing science: is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? management Science, 2010, 56(9): 1599-1614.
[35] Aldridge T T, Audretsch D, Desai S. Nadella V. Scientist entrepreneurship across scientific fields. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39(6): 819-835.
[36] Roldan J L, Leal A. A validation test of an adaptation of the de lone and mcLean's model in the spanish EIS field. In Critical Refections on Information Systems: A Systematic Approach, ed. J. J. Cano. IGI-Global, Hershey, PA. 2003.