运筹与管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 192-198.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2024.0201

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

项目组合多源风险的级联传播及网络韧性测度研究

邹星琪   

  1. 昆明理工大学 管理与经济学院,云南 昆明 650093
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-07 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-08-14
  • 作者简介:邹星琪(1990-),女,陕西西安人,博士,讲师,研究方向:复杂网络与项目组合管理。
  • 基金资助:
    云南省“兴滇英才支持计划”青年人才项目(KKRD202208032);云南省科技厅青年基金项目(KKSQ202308017);昆明理工大学校精品培育项目(KKXA202308007);昆明理工大学校人培基金(KKZ3202308062)

Project Portfolio’s Multi-sourced Risk Propagation and Resilience Measurement

ZOU Xingqi   

  1. Faculty of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
  • Received:2022-01-07 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-08-14

摘要: 针对复杂研发项目中存在的多源风险以及多源风险在项目间的级联传播问题,本文基于改进的贝叶斯网络模型构建了考虑多源风险和多状态的风险级联传播模型,在分析风险在项目组合网络中级联传播的基础上,通过韧性来测度项目组合网络中风险的级联传播效应。首先,分析多源风险导致的项目状态的动态变化,根据“发生风险的概率”和“风险扩散的概率”这两个指标将项目组合的各项目划分为四种状态。然后,基于多源风险和多状态构建了改进的贝叶斯网络模型,分析风险在项目组合网络中的级联传播过程以及风险级联传播导致的项目状态的动态变化。进一步,构建项目组合韧性的测度指标,通过分析项目组合鲁棒性、恢复初始绩效所需的时间和成本来测度风险级联传播对项目组合韧性的影响。最后,以某研发项目组合为例, 验证了本文提出模型和方法的有效性。

关键词: 项目组合网络, 风险级联传播, 韧性测度, 改进贝叶斯网络

Abstract: Due to shared resources, similar technology and process requirements, overlapping target markets, and the diffusion of knowledge or experience among projects, there exist dependencies among various projects within the project portfolio. Also, because of these dependencies, risks occurring in one project can be transferred to other projects, potentially leading to the failure of the entire project portfolio. Aiming at the multi-sourced risk in complex R&D projects and risk propagation between projects, the paper builds a model of risk propagation considering multi-sourced risk and multi-stated problems caused by risk propagation based on the improved Bayesian network model.
Firstly, the paper analyzes the multi-sourced risks and multi-stated problems in complex R&D project. Multi-sourced risks refer to different types of risks that exist during the process of project portfolio, such as technological risks, management risks, business risks, and external risks. Multi-stated refer to changes in project status caused by the occurrence of risks and the cascading propagation of risks within the project portfolio network. Based on the indicators of “the probability of risk occurrence” and “the probability of risk diffusion”, the paper classifies the projects in the portfolio into four states, specifically: 1)The risk transferrer, which refers to the projects with a high probability of risk occurrence and a high probability of risk diffusion, indicating that the project is prone to risks and is likely to transfer these risks to other projects in the network. 2)The risk terminator, which refers to projects with a high probability of risk occurrence but a low probability of risk diffusion, indicating that the project has encountered risks, but the team has excellent risk-handling capabilities and has effectively resolved these risks. And, the project accumulates rich knowledge and experience in the process and ensures that the risk does not transfer to other projects in the network. 3)The risk immunizer, which refers to projects with a low probability of risk occurrence and a low probability of risk diffusion, indicating that the project has not yet encountered risks. Additionally, the project team possesses excellent risk-handling capabilities, enabling the risks to be resolved within the project without transferring to other projects in the network. 4)The risk susceptible, which refers to projects with a low probability of risk occurrence but a high probability of risk diffusion, indicating that the project has not yet encountered risks, but the project team has poor risk-handling capacities, making it difficult to resolve risks within the project, thus increasing the likelihood of these risks transferring to other projects in the portfolio. In summary, the probability of risk occurrence depends on the project’s own risk probability and the probability of obtaining risks from other dependent projects due to risk propagation. And, the probability of risk diffusion depends on the risk-handling capabilities of project’s R&D team after the occurrence of risks.
Furthermore, the paper analyzes the risk propagation in the portfolio network through the construction of an improved Bayesian network. Bayesian network, a commonly used method in machine learning, is a process of determining posterior probabilities based on known conditional probabilities and prior probabilities. In traditional Bayesian network models, nodes only have two states: Failure(F) and True(T). However, for individual projects within the project portfolio, merely using failure and success to measure the project’s status is inaccurate. For projects within the project portfolio, it is necessary to measure the impact of “multi-sourced risks” and “multi-stated problems” on the risk propagation in portfolio. Therefore, the paper further constructs an improved Bayesian network model to analyze the risk propagation process of “multi-sourced risks” and “multi-stated”.
In addition, resilience is an important issue in the field of complex networks, which refers to the ability of the whole network to return to the initial state or better state when a certain element of the network is at risk. For the portfolio network, resilience refers to the ability of the entire portfolio to withstand the risk and achieve its initial performance when the project is exposed to risk. Under the condition of risk propagation, the risk influence includes direct impact and indirect impact. The direct impact is on the project where the risk arises, and the ability of the project to achieve its initial performance may be affected. Indirect impact refers to other projects in the portfolio. The risk may be transmitted to other projects in the network that are directly and indirectly related to the project, so that the performance of the whole project portfolio will be affected. In conclusion, the paper analyzes the resilience of project portfolio network through the following aspects: 1)The ability of the whole portfolio to achieve its initial performance after the occurrence of risks, that is, the robustness analysis of the project portfolio. 2)How quickly the portfolio can recover from the risk event, i.e. the time required for the portfolio to recover its initial performance. 3)The cost required to enable the entire project portfolio to achieve its initial performance after the occurrence of risks. Finally, the R&D project portfolio is taken as an example to verify the effectiveness of the model and method proposed in the paper.

Key words: the project portfolio network, risk propagation, resilience analysis, the improved Bayesian network

中图分类号: