运筹与管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 62-68.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2025.0010

• 理论分析与方法探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于混合策略的资源转移时间费用型重复性建设项目调度问题

邹豪波1, 周国华2, 杨力1   

  1. 1.四川旅游学院 经济管理学院,四川 成都 610100;
    2.西南交通大学 经济管理学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-19 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2025-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 杨力(1982-),男,四川绵阳人,博士,讲师,研究方向:项目管理和创新。Email: zhbhlp@gmail.com。
  • 作者简介:邹豪波(1988-),男,四川成都人,博士,讲师,研究方向:项目管理和调度优化。
  • 基金资助:
    国铁集团科技研究开发计划重大课题(K2022G002);四川省哲学社会科学规划研究项目(SCJJ24ND050)

Resources Transfer Time-cost Repetitive Construction Project Scheduling Problem Based on Hybrid Strategy

ZOU Haobo1, ZHOU Guohua2, YANG Li1   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2023-03-19 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-05-16

摘要: 基础设施建设项目多具备位置分布广、内容重复性高的特点,资源在重复单元间进行转移所产生的时间和费用成本会对计划造成较大影响。本文改变以工作组为单位的资源配置思路,充分考虑单元间的资源转移费用和资源冗余产生的闲置费用;设计融合序贯博弈和非支配排序的混合策略,求解成本更低的施工顺序和资源转移路径组合;设计自适应精英保留、交叉和变异策略,形成改进遗传算法(AEIAGA)对问题进行求解。在仿真分析环节,以某铁路标段的桥梁下部工程为实例进行计算后发现:1)不考虑资源转移成本的方案与实际情况相差较大,需对计划进行大幅调整才能满足工程需求;2)资源转移成本的引入会对施工顺序造成较大影响,生成的结果更倾向于在转移成本较低的单元间进行资源转移;3)在考虑实际资源转移成本的情况下,混合策略的运用能够有效降低项目工期和总费用;4)本文针对遗传算法进行的改进能够取得明显效用。

关键词: 重复性建设项目, 资源转移成本, 序贯博弈, 非支配排序, 改进遗传算法

Abstract: A vast majority of infrastructure construction projects are called repetitive construction projects (RCP) because of their wide distribution and high repeatability. Due to dispersed locations, a large number of resources involved, the difficulty with transportation, and the time and cost of resources transfer between units will significantly affect the results of RCP. However, current studies seldom consider the cost of resources transfer, and the way to determine the path of resources transfer is relatively simple. Especially most of RCP regard the working group as a basic resources allocation unit, which fails to carry out plans or pays high idle costs.
This paper studies a resources-constrained multi-mode repetitive construction project scheduling problem with an integrated resources transfer cost and tries to find a combination of construction sequence and resources transfer path to minimize the total cost. The idea of resources allocation based on the working group is changed. The resources transfer cost and idle cost caused by resources redundancy are fully considered to satisfy the resources demand of different units. The quantity and path of resources transfer are determined. An improved genetic algorithm (AEIAGA) is designed to solve the problem based on the self-adaptive elite retention and mutation strategy and the crossover strategy based on the iteration number and fitness value.
In the simulation analysis, taking the lower part of a bridge as an example, we find that: 1.The scheme that does not consider the actual resources transfer cost is quite different from the actual situation, and the plan needs to be significantly adjusted to meet the actual project needs. Compared with scenario 1 and scenario 2, the scheduling results of most of the units are adjusted to meet the actual project requirements. The overall construction period changes from 87 days to 131 days, increasing by 44 days or 50.57%, and the fee increases from 803,758 yuan to 922,544 yuan, by 118,786 yuan or 14.78%. 2.The introduction of resources transfer cost will have a more significant impact on the construction sequence, and the consequences are more inclined to transfer resources between units with a lower transfer cost. In scenario 1, the sequence of resources transfers is relatively chaotic and there is a large amount of cross-cell transfer behavior because of the small impact of resources transfers; in scenario 3, considering the influence of resources transfer, most of resources transfer processes take place between adjacent units. 3.Considering the actual cost of resources transfer, a hybrid strategy can effectively reduce the project time and total cost. Compared with scenario 2, the number of resources transfers in scenario 3 is reduced from 40 to 35, resulting in a reduction of 36-day by 27.48%, and a reduction of 111,130 yuan by 12.05% in cost, so the overall scheme has been significantly optimized. 4. The improvement effect of the genetic algorithm in this paper is remarkable, especially in solving large-scale problems, so the algorithm has obvious advantages. When dealing with large-scale problems, the difference between AEIAGA and AEIAGA begins to widen, and the mean value of the solution is 1.039 times and 1.028 times of AEIAGA, respectively.

Key words: repetitive construction project, resources transfer time cost, sequential game, non-dominant sort, improved genetic algorithm

中图分类号: