小订单优先分配规则对供应链运作的影响

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0152

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 1-10.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0152

• 理论分析与方法探讨 • 下一篇

小订单优先分配规则对供应链运作的影响

陈叶芬¹,赵晓波²

1.北京航空航天大学经济管理学院,北京100191;
2.清华大学工业工程系,北京100084

收稿日期:2014-01-09 出版日期:2015-10-12
作者简介:陈叶芬(1986-),女,云南曲靖人,讲师,研究方向:行为运作管理、行为博弈论;赵晓波( 1962-),男,湖北嘉鱼人,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:物流与供应链管理、生产系统与管理、排队系统、行为运筹学与行为运作管理等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71031005,71210002)

Smallest-order-first Mechanism in Supply Chain Operations

CHEN Ye-fen¹, ZHAO Xiao-bo²

1.School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;
2.Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2014-01-09 Online:2015-10-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过理论分析与实验研究相结合,在完全信息和不完全信息两种模式下,探讨供应短缺情景中小订单优先分配规则对零售商订货决策的影响。理论结果表明,小订单优先诱导零售商制定不超过真实市场需求量的订货决策,并且订货量不随运作成本而改变。实验数据表明,完全信息模式下,被试者的订货量高于理论预测值,不同运作成本的订货决策存在显著差异,并且被试者在不断重复决策中存在学习效应;不完全信息模式下,被试者的订货量与理论的预测没有显著偏差。这些研究结论为小订单优先分配规则的实践应用提供了理论和实证依据。

关键词: 小订单优先, 订货决策, 实验研究, 供应短缺, 行为运作管理

Abstract: Through theoretical analyses and laboratory experiments, in the capacity allocation games with both complete information and incomplete information, this paper investigates the impact of smallest-order-first mechanism on retailers’ ordering decisions in the situation of supply shortage. Theoretical results show that the order decision in the smallest-order-first mechanism does not exceed the market demand and does not change with the operational costs. Experimental data show that, in the complete information capacity allocation games, subjects’ orders are larger than the predictions of standard theory, operational costs influence subject’s ordering behavior, and experience effect exists in subjects’ repeated games; in the incomplete information capacity allocation games, there is no significant difference between subjects’ decisions and standard theory. These studies provide both theoretical and empirical supports to the applications of smallest-order-first allocation rule in the practice.

Key words: smallest-order-first, ordering decision, laboratory experiment, supply shortage, behavioral operations management

中图分类号:

陈叶芬,赵晓波. 小订单优先分配规则对供应链运作的影响[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(5): 1-10.

CHEN Ye-fen, ZHAO Xiao-bo. Smallest-order-first Mechanism in Supply Chain Operations[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(5): 1-10.

参考文献

[1]Fisher M L, Hammond J H, Obermeyer W R, Raman A. Making supply meet demand in an uncertain world[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1994, 72(3): 83-89.
[2]Hwang S L, Valeriano L. Marketers and consumers get jitters over severe shortages of nicotine patches[J]. Wall Street Journal,May 22,B1, 1992.
[3]Blumenstein R. Autos: how do you get a hot GMC suburban? you wait for a computer to dole out[J]. Wall Street Journal, April 10, B1, 1996.
[4]Zarley C K. Damore backlogs plague HP: resellers place phantom orders to get more product[J]. Computer Resellers News, May 6, 247, 1996.
[5]Cachon G, Lariviere M. An equilibrium analysis of linear, proportional and uniform allocation of scarce capacity[J]. IIE Transactions, 1999a, 31(9) 835-849.
[6]Cachon G, Lariviere M. Capacity choice and allocation: strategic behavior and supply chain performance[J]. Management Science, 1999b, 45(8): 1091-1108.
[7]Cachon G, Lariviere M. Capacity allocation using past sales: when to turn-and-earn[J]. Management Science, 1999c, 45(5): 685-703.
[8]Lu L X, Lariviere M. Capacity allocation over a long horizon: the return on turn-and-earn[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2012, 14(1): 24-41.
[9]陈洪建,万杰.线性分配机制下零售商的行为研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2002,31(6):80-84.
[10]陈洪建,万杰.两种分配机制对供应链中实体的影响研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2005,34(2):39-45.
[11]刘作仪,查勇.行为运作管理:一个正在显现的研究领域 [J].管理科学学报,2009,12(4):64-74.
[12]崔崟,陈剑,肖勇波.行为库存管理研究综述及前景展望 [J].管理科学学报,2011,14(6):96-108.
[13]刘咏梅,李立,刘洪莲.行为供应链研究综述[J].中南大学学报,2011,17(1):80-88.
[14]赵晓波,谢金星,张汉勤,华中生等.展望服务科学[J].工业工程与管理,2009,1:1-4.
[15]Schweitzer M E, Cachon G P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: experimental evidence[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(3): 404-420.
[16]Su X. Bounded rationality in newsvendor models[J]. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(4): 566-589.
[17]Cui T H, Raju J S, Zhang Z J. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8): 1303-1314.
[18]廖诺,林英昌,何龙.零售商风险态度对其订货决策影响的实验研究[J].工业工程与管理,2012,17(3):30-35.
[19]Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann U W. Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors[J]. Management Science, 2013, 59(8): 1800-1816.
[20]Chen Y, Su X, Zhao X. Modeling bounded rationality in capacity allocation games with the quantal response equilibrium[J]. Management Science, 2012, 58(10): 1952-1962.
[21]Katok E. Using laboratory experiments to build better operations management models[J]. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 2011, 5(1): 1-88.
[22]Katok E. Laboratory experiments in operations management[J]. TutORials in Operations Research, 2011. 15-35.

小订单优先分配规则对供应链运作的影响

Smallest-order-first Mechanism in Supply Chain Operations

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics