博弈方的行动集合变化的博弈运动研究——以稀土出口贸易为例

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0159

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 57-65.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0159

博弈方的行动集合变化的博弈运动研究
——以稀土出口贸易为例

徐寅峰^1,2,文生威

1.四川大学商学院,四川成都610065;
2.机械制造系统工程国家重点实验室,陕西西安710049

收稿日期:2013-07-14 出版日期:2015-10-12
作者简介:徐寅峰(1962-),男,吉林人,教授,研究方向:运筹与控制;文生威(1987-),男,河南人,硕士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371129,61221063);长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT1173)

Research on the Gaming of the Players’ Action Sets Changing:
A Case Study of the Rare Earth Trade

XU Yin-feng^1,2, WEN Sheng-wei

1.Business School of Si Chuan University, Chengdu610064, China;
2.State Key Lab for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an710049, China

Received:2013-07-14 Online:2015-10-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文章以稀土出口贸易为背景,分析了博弈方的行动集合随时间变化的博弈运动。首先定义了行动集合的三种变化情形:集合变大、集合变小和集合变化不确定。然后针对单个博弈方行动集合的三种变化情形,分别讨论了均衡解的运动轨迹,分析表明:在行动集合变大和变小两种情形下,均衡解的轨迹呈现互逆的运动特性;在行动集合变化不确定的情形下,保守和冒险策略等价,固定策略严格优于保守、冒险策略。在此基础上,将模型推广到博弈双方的行动集合均发生变化的博弈运动模型,分析表明上述结论仍然成立。最后,以中国同马来西亚在2012年6月到2013年3月间的稀土出口贸易为例,验证了本文模型和求解方法的合理性与可行性。

关键词: 稀土贸易, 寡头竞争, 行动集合, 博弈运动, 运动轨迹

Abstract: Considering the export of rare earth as background, this paper analyzes the gaming model in which the players’ action sets are changing over time. First, we define three changing styles for action set: action set heightening, action set shrinking, and action set changing indeterminacy. Then we investigate the track of the equilibrium solution in which only one player’s action set will change over time. The results show that the tracks of the equilibrium solution when the action set heightening and shrinking are opposite, and the stationary strategy is strictly superior to conservative strategy and risky strategy which are equivalent in this situation. Moreover, this single action set changing model is applied to both two action sets changing over time and the results still hold trne for the new model. Finally, the rationality and feasibility of the gaming model and solution are validated by a case study of the rare earth export of China and Malaysia from June 2012 to March 2013.

Key words: rare earth trade, oligopoly competition, action sets, gaming, motion trial

中图分类号:

F224

徐寅峰,文生威. 博弈方的行动集合变化的博弈运动研究
——以稀土出口贸易为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(5): 57-65.

XU Yin-feng, WEN Sheng-wei. Research on the Gaming of the Players’ Action Sets Changing:
A Case Study of the Rare Earth Trade[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(5): 57-65.

参考文献

[1] Schwalbe U, Walker P. Zermelo and the early history of game theory[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2001, 34(09): 123-137.
[2]Neumann J V, Zur theorie der gesellschaftsspiele[J]. Mathematische Annalen, 1928, 100(1): 295-320.
[3]Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior(commemorative edition)[M]. Princeton university press, 2007.
[4]Nash J. Non-cooperative games[J]. The Annals of Mathematics, 1951, 54(2): 286-295.
[5]Smith J M, Price G R. The logic of animal conflict[J]. Nature, 1973, 246: 15.
[6]Tse P K. China’s rare-earth industry[M]. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 2011.
[7]王正明,张许静.稀土资源税对“寡头”国出口市场势力的影响研究[J].经济经纬,2012,2(2):52-55.
[8]裴文琳, 孔锐. 我国稀土进出口量与价格关联度状况分析[J].资源开发与市场, 2011, 7: 613-616.
[9]Elsadany A A. Competition analysis of a triopoly game with bounded rationality[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2012, 45(11): 1343-1348.
[10]Elsadany A A, Agiza H N, Elabbasy E M. Complex dynamics and chaos control of heterogeneous quadropoly game[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2013, 219(24): 11110-11118.
[11]卢亚丽.主从型Bertrand价格博弈模型及其动力学分析[J].系统工程,2012,30(002):91-94.
[12]闫安,达庆利,裴凤.多个企业同时博弈的动态古诺模型的长期产量解研究[J].管理工程学报,2013,(1):94-98.
[13]Mallard G. Modelling cognitively bounded rationality: an evaluative taxonomy[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2012, 26(4): 674-704.
[14]廖萍康,张卫国,谢百帅,闫杜娟.相异成本和广义非线性需求下多寡头古诺模型及应用[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(2):172-179.
[15]Anufriev M, Kopányi D, Tuinstra J. Learning cycles in Bertrand competition with differentiated commodities and competing learning rules[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2013, 37(12): 2562-2581.
[16]Zschocke M S, Mantin B, Jewkes E M. Mature or emerging markets: competitive duopoly investment decisions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 228(2): 612-622.

博弈方的行动集合变化的博弈运动研究
——以稀土出口贸易为例

Research on the Gaming of the Players’ Action Sets Changing:
A Case Study of the Rare Earth Trade

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王博, 肖刚, 肖潇. 基于双层博弈模型的民用航空产业链研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 7-12.
[2]	颜锦江, 郭春香, 龚浩. 面向网络外部性特征产品的供应链动态竞争策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 76-82.
[3]	王能发, 杨哲. 反需求函数集值情况下单主多从寡头竞争模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(2): 163-166.

博弈方的行动集合变化的博弈运动研究——以稀土出口贸易为例

Research on the Gaming of the Players’ Action Sets Changing: A Case Study of the Rare Earth Trade

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

博弈方的行动集合变化的博弈运动研究
——以稀土出口贸易为例

Research on the Gaming of the Players’ Action Sets Changing:
A Case Study of the Rare Earth Trade