基于优势关系粗糙集方法的通用航空产业重点发展项目分类研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2016.0077

运筹与管理 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 11-18.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2016.0077

基于优势关系粗糙集方法的通用航空产业重点发展项目分类研究

朱煜明,史丽丽,韩青叶

西北工业大学管理学院,陕西西安 710072

收稿日期:2014-05-28 出版日期:2016-06-25
作者简介:朱煜明(1971-),男,江苏张家港人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为系统评价,项目管理;史丽丽(1987-),女,河南许昌人,研究方向为管理系统工程,项目管理;韩青叶(1988-),女,河北晋州人,研究方向为项目管理、战略管理。
基金资助:
国家科技部软科学研究计划项目(2010GXS5D264);陕西省社会科学基金(2015R025);西北工业大学研究生创业种子基金资助

Research on Classification for Key Development Projects in General Aviation Industry by Using Dominance Relationship Based Rough Set Approach

ZHU Yu-ming, SHI Li-li, HAN Qing-Ye

School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710072, China

Received:2014-05-28 Online:2016-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构建了一种基于优势关系粗糙集方法的通用航空产业重点发展项目分类模型。该模型根据多标准决策分析(Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, MCDA)中的分类研究思想,结合GE矩阵评价方法,利用基于优势关系的粗糙集方法,从项目竞争力与项目吸引力两个方面建立指标体系,构建了通用航空产业重点发展项目分类模型。以陕西通用航空产业重点发展项目分类为案例,验证了该模型可以很好地解决局部信息缺失条件下的通用航空产业重点项目分类评价问题。

关键词: 通用航空产业, 项目分类, 优势关系, 粗糙集, 通用航空产业, 项目分类, 优势关系, 粗糙集

Abstract: Based on the method of dominance relationship rough set, a classification model for sorting key development projects in General Aviation Industry is proposed. The model, which is inspired by the idea of classification of multi-criteria decision analysis(Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, MCDA) and GE matrix, establishes indicators from project competitiveness and project attractiveness, and uses the method of dominance relationship based rough set to classify the key development projects in general aviation industry. The effectiveness of the proposed model has been verified by the employment of the model in classifying key development projects in Shaanxi General Aviation Industry. Meanwhile, the result proves that the model can solve classification and evaluation of key project issues in general aviation industry under the circumstance where partial information is missing.

Key words: general aviation industry, project classification, dominance relationship, rough set, general aviation industry, project classification, dominance relationship, rough set

中图分类号:

朱煜明,史丽丽,韩青叶. 基于优势关系粗糙集方法的通用航空产业重点发展项目分类研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 11-18.

ZHU Yu-ming, SHI Li-li, HAN Qing-Ye. Research on Classification for Key Development Projects in General Aviation Industry by Using Dominance Relationship Based Rough Set Approach[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(3): 11-18.

参考文献

[1] Rogalski T, Wielgat R. A concept of voice guided general aviation aircraft[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2010, 14(5): 321-328.
[2] Gorke S, Reichel R, Hesse S. A generic platform for safety-critical applications in general aviation[C]//Aerospace Conference, 2011 IEEE. IEEE, 2011: 1-9.[3] Sampigethaya K, Poovendran R, Taylor C. Privacy of general aviation aircraft in the NextGen[C]//Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st. IEEE, 2012: 7B5-1-7B5-12.
[4] Joseph B.S. The cost of general aviation accidents in the United States[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013, (47): 19-27.
[5] Yu J, Zhang J, Li Y. Priority assessing method for aviation multi-project based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[C]//Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2008. WiCOM’08.4th International Conference on. IEEE, 2008: 1-5.
[6] Pan X, Wang H, Chang W. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation method for failure risk of aviation product R&D project[C]//Management of Innovation and Technology(ICMIT), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2010: 1106-1111.
[7] Sun S. Comparison on general aviation industry statistics between China and the United States[C]//Computer Science and Service System (CSSS), 2011 International Conference on. Nanjing, China. June 27-29, 2011.
[8] Wen J, Zhang S. Forecast study on development demand of general aviation in China based on gray-model[C]//E-Business and E-Government(ICEE), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 1-4.
[9] 吴斌.浅论中国民营航空业低成本策略[J].上海交通大学学报,2007,(41):33-36.
[10] McKinsey quarterly enduring ideas: the Ge-mcKinsey nine-box matrix, https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Enduring ideas The GE McKinsey nine-box matrix 2198.
[11] 于明洁,郭鹏,朱煜明.基于方法集的棕地再开发项目组合评价研究[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(3):119-126.
[12] Harold A, Linstone and Turoff M. The delphi method: techniques and applications[M]. Newark, America, 2002.
[13] Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM[J]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, (14): 1-14.
[14] Hobbs B F, Meier P. Energy decisions and the environment: a guide to the use of multicriteria methods[M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
[15] Chen Y, Hipel K, Kilgur M, Zhu Y. A strategic classification support system for brownfield redevelopment[J].Environmental Modelling & Software, 2009,0 24(5): 647-654.
[16] Keeney R. Value focused thinking: a path to creative decision making[M]. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992.
[17] Belton V, Stewart T J. Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach[M]. Springer, 2002.
[18] 陆爱国.粗糙集理论及其扩展模型的研究[D].西安电子科技大学,2004.
[19] 张文修,仇国芳.基于粗糙集的不确定决策[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[20] Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough set theory for multicriteria decision analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, (129): 1-47.
[21] Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R, et al. An algorithm for induction of decision rules consistent with the dominance principle[C]//Rough sets and current trends in computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001: 304-313.
[22] 朱煜明,史丽丽,于明洁.基于GE矩阵的陕西航空产业集群子产业评价与选择研究[J].航空制造技术,2012,(15):95-99.

基于优势关系粗糙集方法的通用航空产业重点发展项目分类研究

Research on Classification for Key Development Projects in General Aviation Industry by Using Dominance Relationship Based Rough Set Approach

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘潇, 王效俐. 基于k-means和邻域粗糙集的航空客户价值分类研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 104-111.
[2]	张立军, 高春晓. 基于k-means聚类与粗糙集算法的指标筛选方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 8-12.
[3]	李雪岩, 李学伟, 李静. 基于混沌集群智能优化算法的多目标粗糙集属性约减[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 30-37.
[4]	施振佺陈世平. 一种改进的k-modes聚类算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 112-117.
[5]	王宁,刘海园,周雪珂. 基于粗糙集的应急案例中概率规则挖掘方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(12): 84-94.
[6]	刘国巍,张停停. 基于GFM-VAR的我国通用航空产业演进阶段识别及政策强度有效性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(11): 70-78.
[7]	仲秋雁, 王然, 曲毅. 基于粗糙集的突发事件属性约简方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 89-95.
[8]	李玉超, 徐金华. 基于Vague粗糙集信息熵的属性约简算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(5): 1-5.
[9]	鲍新中, 傅宏宇. 基于变精度加权平均粗糙度决策树的财务预警研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(3): 189-196.
[10]	谭旭, 毛太田, 邹凯. 可用性观点下的烟叶质量粗糙集评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(3): 219-226.
[11]	杨栩, 肖蘅, 廖姗. 基于MC-ZF-HD-DS的高端装备制造企业持续创新能力评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(1): 270-279.
[12]	孙秉珍, 马卫民, 赵海燕. 基于双论域模糊粗糙集的应急决策模型与方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(2): 41-48.
[13]	程巧莲, 胡珑瑛, 崔双双. 基于知识转移的合作创新伙伴信任评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(1): 143-150.
[14]	范德成, 王韶华, 张伟, 贾立江. 低碳经济范式下能源结构优化程度评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(6): 168-176.
[15]	杨红梅. 集对分析在我国经济增长模糊规则提取中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(3): 194-200.