城市CIS物理关联脆弱性的动态分析方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2017.0194

运筹与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 115-122.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0194

城市CIS物理关联脆弱性的动态分析方法

王诗莹, 李向阳, 于峰

哈尔滨工业大学管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2014-08-03 出版日期:2017-08-25
作者简介:王诗莹(1985-),女,博士研究生,研究方向:应急管理,关键基础设施保护;李向阳(1950-),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:应急管理,管理决策及其支持系统;于峰(1990-),男,博士研究生,研究方向:应急智能决策。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(91024028,91024031,91324018,71473058)

Dynamic Assessment Method of Urban Critical Infrastructure System Physical Interdependency Vulnerability

WANG Shi-ying, LI Xiang-yang, YU Feng

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Received:2014-08-03 Online:2017-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以城市关键基础设施系统(Critical Infrastructure System, CIS)为研究对象,将关键基础设施之间组成的复杂物理网络划分为个体层面、中观层面和系统层面三种类型,从物理关联势差的角度分析了城市CIS内部物理关联机理。根据城市CIS物理关联特性,引入元胞自动机(Cellular Automata, CA),以一种物理资源为主导建立模型,采用“自底向上”的方法,从微观关键基础设施活动推出宏观城市CIS表现。选取元胞连通性、元胞正常状态变化率和传输效率作为脆弱性评估指标,估算不同时间点城市CIS脆弱性的动态变化,实现物理关联脆弱性的动态分析,并运用加权平均值作为一段时间内城市CIS脆弱值。最后,以S城市为例,对物理关联脆弱性动态分析方法的合理性和有效性进行验证,评估结果为城市CIS保护提供支持。

关键词: 关键基础设施系统, 物理关联, 脆弱性, 元胞自动机

Abstract: Taking urban critical infrastructure systems(CIS)as the research object, this paper divides the physical network among three different types of critical infrastructures into individual level, medium level and system level, and then analyzes the urban CIS internal physical interdependency mechanism from the perspective of physical potential. According to urban CIS physical interdependency features, this paper researches manifestation of big system(Macro) from activities of critical infrastructure(Micro)by introducing a bottom-up research method named Cellular Automata(CA), and then using cellular connectivity,the states of norm cellular and transmission efficiency as indexes of vulnerability, estimates system vulnerability of different time points and takes the average weighted over a period of time as the final vulnerability value to implement the dynamic vulnerability assessment of urban CIS physics interdependency; Last, taking S city as an example, it verifies the reasonability and effectivity of this dynamic vulnerability assessment method, and the results also can provide the suggestions for urban CIS protection.

Key words: critical infrastructure systems(CIS), physical interdependency, vulnerability, cellular automata

中图分类号:

X913.4

王诗莹, 李向阳, 于峰. 城市CIS物理关联脆弱性的动态分析方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(8): 115-122.

WANG Shi-ying, LI Xiang-yang, YU Feng. Dynamic Assessment Method of Urban Critical Infrastructure System Physical Interdependency Vulnerability[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(8): 115-122.

参考文献

[1] Jones D A, Murnquist M A. Simulation of imperfect information in vulnerability modeling for infrastructure facilities[C]. Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, USA: WSC, 2005: 965-966.
[2] Buldyrev S V, Parshani R, Paul G. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(15): 1025-1028.
[3] Rinaldi S M, Peerenboom J P, Kelly T K. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependency[J]. IEEE Control System,2001, 21(06): 11-25.
[4] Rinaldi S M. Modeling and simulation critical infrastructures and their interdependencies[C]. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 2004: 1-8.
[5] Johansson J, Hassel H. An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010, 95(12): 1335-1344.
[6] Haimes Y Y, Jiang P. Leonief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2001, 7(1): 1-12.
[7] Permann M R. Genetic algorithms for agent-based infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis[C]. Presented at the spring simulation multi-conference. USA: Norfolk, VA, 2007: 28.
[8] Brown T, Beyeler W, Barton D. Assessing infrastructure interdependencies: the challenge of risk analysis for complex adaptive systems[J]. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure 2004, 1(1): 108-117.
[9] 刘洋,樊治平,袁媛.突发事件应急响应的多属性风险决策方法研究[J].运筹与管理,2012,22(1):23-28.
[10] Tumer B L, Kasperson R E. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the united states of America, 2003, 100(14): 8074-8079.
[11] 石勇,许世远,石纯,等.自然灾害脆弱性研究进展[J].自然灾害脆弱性研究进展,2011,20(2):131-137.
[12] Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B. At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters[M]. London, UK: Routledge, 1994. 158-167.
[13] Haimes Y Y. On the definition of vulnerabilities in measuring risk to infrastructures[J]. Risk Analysis, 2006, 26(2): 293-296.
[14] 李军,李向阳,张佰尚.然异动下关键基础设施网络风险研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(9):66-73.
[15] 牛志广,高希丽,王晨晨.城市供水管网脆弱性评价研究进展[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(6):157-163.
[16] 尹洪英,徐丽群.基于贝叶斯网络的路网脆弱路段识别模型[J].系统管理学报,2010,19(6):656-661.
[17] Dung T. Nguyen, Yilin Shen. Detecting critical nodes in interdependent power networks for vulnerability assessement[C]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2013, 4(1): 151-159.
[18] Zhang Zili, Li Xiangyang, Li Hengyun. A quantitative approach for assessing the critical nodal and linear elements of a railway infrastructure[J]. Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2015, 8: 3-15.
[19] 于瑛英.城市脆弱性评估体系研究[J].北京信息科技大学学报(自然科学版) ,2011,(1):57-61,72.
[20] 邵传青,易立新.重要基础设施脆弱性评价模型及其应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(11):153-158.
[21] Johansson J, Hassel H, Zio E. Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: comparing two approaches in the context of power systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 120: 27-38.
[22] Nan C, Eusgeld I, Kroger W. Analyzing vulnerabilities between SCADA system and SUC due to interdependencies[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 113: 76-93.
[23] 王淑良,岳昕.关联基础设施系统脆弱性分析[J].计算机应用研究,2014,31(4):976-981.
[24] 张廷,高宝俊,宣慧玉.基于元胞自动机的创新扩散模型综述[J].系统工程,2006,24(12):6-15.
[25] Claudio M, Rocco S. Network reliability assessment using a cellular automata approach[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 78(3): 289-295.
[26] Claudio M, Rocco S, Enrico Z. Solving advanced network reliability problems by means of cellular automata and monte carlo sampling[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2005, 89(2): 219-226.

城市CIS物理关联脆弱性的动态分析方法

Dynamic Assessment Method of Urban Critical Infrastructure System Physical Interdependency Vulnerability

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郑豆豆龚晶, 高蕾. 基于UTA方法的关键基础设施系统的保护研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 75-80.
[2]	郭宁, 郭鹏, 刘洋. 基于复杂网络的并联式项目群结构脆弱性评估[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 196-201.
[3]	何建佳, 刘举胜, 刘洋. 基于元胞自动机的供需网企业合作驱动建模与仿真[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 186-191.
[4]	王洪利. 基于元胞自动机的电子商务平台知识产权监管的演化分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 209-216.
[5]	李雪岩, 李学伟, 李静. 基于混沌集群智能优化算法的多目标粗糙集属性约减[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 30-37.
[6]	马龙, 卢才武, 顾清华, 陈晓妮. 多目标0-1规划问题的元胞狼群优化算法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(3): 17-24.
[7]	荣莉莉, 周培亨, 张荣. 一种基于一维元胞自动机的灾害后果推演模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(3): 158-164.