双元领导与员工追随行为的匹配机制研究:一个模糊专家系统模型

doi:10.12005/orms.2019.0093

运筹与管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 169-174.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2019.0093

双元领导与员工追随行为的匹配机制研究:一个模糊专家系统模型

罗瑾琏,闫佳祺

同济大学经济与管理学院, 上海 200092

收稿日期:2017-09-25 出版日期:2019-04-25
通讯作者: 闫佳祺(1991-),男,辽宁阜新人,博士研究生,研究方向:领导力、组织行为与人力资源管理。
作者简介:罗瑾琏(1962-),女,湖南湘潭人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:领导力、组织行为与人力资源管理
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71772138,71472137,71701004)

Fit between Ambidextrous Leadership and Followership: A Model of Fuzzy Expert System

LUO Jin-lian, YAN Jia-qi

School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2017-09-25 Online:2019-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于模糊专家系统模型,探讨了三种视角下双元领导组合(交易-变革双元领导、开放-闭合双元领导和松式-紧式双元领导)与员工尊敬学习、忠诚奉献、权威维护、意图领会、有效沟通和积极执行等6种追随行为的匹配机制。并以DR集团为例,研究发现: 当DR集团部门主管展现较多的松式-紧式领导特质,较少地展现交易-变革领导特质和开放-闭合领导特质时,员工更容易产生积极执行追随行为,结论验证了模型的有效性。该研究对不同情境下多重视角双元领导组合的有效性进行了探索,为管理实践中领导力发展提供了参考与启示。

关键词: 双元领导, 追随行为, 匹配, 模糊专家系统

Abstract: Based on model of fuzzy expert system, this paper explores the fit mechanism between three types of ambidextrous leadership(i.e. transactional leadership and transformational leadership, opening leadership and closing leadership, loose leadership and tight leadership)and six followership behaviors(i.e. respect and study, fidelity and dedication, upholding authority, understanding intention, effective communication and execution). And applying the model to analyze DR Group, we find that employees have better execution when supervisors have more “loose-tight” leadership, less “transactional-transformational” leadership and less “exploration-exploitation” leadership. The conclusion demonstrates the descriptive power of the model. This paper contributes to the effectiveness of ambidextrous leadership in different contexts from the multi-perspective, and it provides reference and suggestions for practice.

Key words: ambidextrous leadership, followership, fit, fuzzy expert system

中图分类号:

F272.3

罗瑾琏,闫佳祺. 双元领导与员工追随行为的匹配机制研究:一个模糊专家系统模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 169-174.

LUO Jin-lian, YAN Jia-qi. Fit between Ambidextrous Leadership and Followership: A Model of Fuzzy Expert System[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(4): 169-174.

参考文献

[1] 周文杰,宋继文,李浩澜.中国情境下追随力的内涵、结构与测量[J].管理学报,2015,12(3):355-363.
[2] 闫佳祺,贾建锋,罗瑾琏.变革型领导的跨层级传递与追随力:人力资源管理强度和企业性质的调节效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(10):147-157.
[3] Alfes K, Langner N. Paradoxical leadership: Understanding and managing conflicting tensions to foster volunteer engagement[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 2017, 46(2): 96-103.
[4] 罗瑾琏,赵莉,韩杨,钟竞,管建世.双元领导研究进展述评[J].管理学报,2016,13(12):1882-1889.
[5] Bass B M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations[M]. New York: Collier Macmillan, 1985.
[6] Zacher Robinson Rosing. Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance: the role of exploration and exploitation behaviors[J]. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2014, 55(1): 24-46.
[7] Sagie A. Tightening the loose-tight model of leadership[J]. Applied Psychology, 1997, 46(4): 447-452.
[8] Burns J M. Leadership, 1978[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
[9] Foti R J, Hansbrough T K, Epitropaki O, et al. Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: approaches, findings, and future directions[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2017, 28(2): 261-267.
[10] 彭坚,王震.做上司的“意中人”:负担还是赋能？追随原型?特质匹配的双刃剑效应[J].心理学报,2018,50(2):216-225.
[11] Chaleff I. The courageous follower: Standing up to and for our leaders[M]. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, 1995.
[12] Bjugstad K, Thach E C, Thompson K J, et al. A fresh look at followership: a model for matching followership and leadership styles[J]. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 2006, 7(3): 304-311.
[13] Epitropaki O, Kark R, Mainemelis C, et al. Leadership and followership identity processes: a multilevel review[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2017, 28(1): 104-129.
[14] 丁栋虹,黄胜兰,陈志,宋怡,黄秀丽.领导风格与组织情境的匹配研究:基于模糊专家系统模型[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(2):258-263.
[15] Venturelli A, Caputo F, Leopizzi R, et al. How can CSR identity be evaluated? a pilot study using a fuzzy expert system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141(10): 1000-1010.
[16] Katigari M R, Ayatollahi H, Malek M, et al. Fuzzy expert system for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy[J]. World Journal of Diabetes, 2017, 8(2): 80-88.
[17] Sari K. Modeling of a fuzzy expert system for choosing an appropriate supply chain collaboration strategy[J]. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 2017: 1-8(in press).

双元领导与员工追随行为的匹配机制研究:一个模糊专家系统模型

Fit between Ambidextrous Leadership and Followership: A Model of Fuzzy Expert System

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	向婷, 李妍峰. 基于成本和加班时长的双目标家庭护理人员调度问题[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 233-239.
[2]	张莉莉, 马丹妮, 娄媛. 基于优势的双边匹配决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 50-56.
[3]	林浩, 林澜. 一类二阶段指派问题[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 97-101.
[4]	宋华, 杨晓叶. 基于营运资金信息匹配平台的供应链金融动态折扣决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 92-99.
[5]	白朝阳, 王浩, 王姝婷, 兰甜甜. 考虑产品与单元匹配的单元装配系统构建模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 212-219.
[6]	乐琦, 朱加贵. 基于三角直觉模糊数信息的双边匹配决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 57-62.
[7]	刘丽, 张再生, 王哲. 基于双边匹配-动态博弈的碳减排技术投资决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 20-26.
[8]	张耀杰, 李杰刚, 史本山. ST摘帽如何影响公司价值和股价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 212-220.
[9]	刘桔, 杨琴, 周永务, 曹策俊. 面向师生感知满意度的双边匹配决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 16-26.
[10]	孙卫红, 吕文新. 区域集群下板材订单配置模型及算法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 38-42.
[11]	张笛, 戴红军, 刘晓瑞. 考虑后悔规避与匹配意愿的直觉模糊双边匹配方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 132-139.
[12]	高宇璇,杜跃平,孙秉珍,王锐. 考虑患者个性化需求的医疗服务匹配决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 17-25.
[13]	曲佳莉, 胡本勇, 陈旭. 销售商出售看跌期权的供应链优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 23-29.
[14]	张笛, 孙涛, 陈晔, 万良琪. 基于语言偏好信息的稳定双边匹配决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 60-66.
[15]	陈希, 孙欢, 梁海明. 差异化需求下考虑患者预约行为的医疗服务供需匹配方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 90-97.