Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 127-136.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0218

• Application Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative Analysis of Price Discovery in Three SSE 50 Index Markets: the Index Futures, ETF and ETF Options Markets

WANG Su-sheng1, XU Tong-tong1, WANG Jun-bo1, YU Zhen2   

  1. 1.School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China;
    2.Qianhai Financial Holdings Co., Ltd. Post-doctoral Innovation Base & Lingnan(University)College, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518052, China
  • Received:2016-11-26 Online:2017-09-25

上证50股指期货、ETF期权与ETF市场的价格发现能力对比分析

王苏生1, 许桐桐1, 王俊博1, 余臻2   

  1. 1.哈尔滨工业大学深圳 经济管理学院,广东 深圳 518055;
    2.前海金融控股有限公司博士后创新实践基地&中山大学岭南大学学院,广东 深圳 518052
  • 作者简介:王苏生(1969-),男,湖北洪湖人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:金融工程;许桐桐(1987-),男,山东泰安人,博士研究生,研究方向金融工程。
  • 基金资助:
    深圳软科学项目(JCYJ20140417173156101)

Abstract: This study investigates the price discovery function in Shanghai 50 index markets: the index futures, ETF and ETF options markets. Put-call parity is applied to calculate the implied spot price of ETF options. Using 5 minutes high frequency matched synchronous data, Granger causality tests, generalized impulse response, Johannsen cointegration tests and vector error correction model are employed to analyse the lead-lag relationship of spots and derivatives. The results indicate that the three price series are a cointegrated system with one long-run stochastic trend, and stock index futures price leads other market at least 5 minutes. When the contribution of price discovery is calculated by using the generalized information sharing model and permanent transitory model, it is found that the futures market serves the dominant price discovery function in the long term. However, the ETF market serves the dominant during the boom period, and the ETF options market serves the dominant during the crash period.

Key words: price discovery, put call parity, vector error correction model, generalized information share model

摘要: 比较基于上证50指数的股指期货、ETF期权与现货ETF市场的价格发现能力,选取5分钟高频数据进行实证分析,并将暴涨暴跌行情与全样本区间进行了对比分析。首先,采用买权卖权等价理论反推期权价格隐含的现货价格;其次,运用向量误差修正模型,结合广义脉冲响应函数等分析方法研究市场间价格的领先滞后关系;最后,运用广义信息共享模型量化各个市场的价格发现贡献度。结果表明:在不同区间中,期货市场均领先其他市场至少5分钟;从长期来看,期货在价格发现中的贡献度最大,期权次之;在暴涨区间中,ETF的价格发现贡献度最大,期货次之;在暴跌区间中,期权的价格发现贡献度最大,期货次之。

关键词: 价格发现, 买权卖权等价理论, 向量误差修正模型, 广义信息共享模型

CLC Number: