Safety Efficiency of Strait/Canal on the Maritime Silk Road

doi:10.12005/orms.2019.0070

Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 173-182.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2019.0070

• Application Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

Safety Efficiency of Strait/Canal on the Maritime Silk Road

GONG Xiao-xing¹, LV Jing¹, LI Hui²

1.Transportation Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026,China;
2.Teaching and Research Institute of Foreign Languages, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, China

Received:2017-02-22 Online:2019-03-25

海上丝绸之路关键海峡/运河安全效率研究

宫晓婞¹, 吕靖¹, 李辉²

1.大连海事大学交通运输工程学院,辽宁大连 116026;
2渤海大学大学外语教研部,辽宁锦州 121013

通讯作者: 宫晓婞(1983-),女,辽宁大连人,副教授,博士,研究方向:海运安全与管理
作者简介:吕靖(1959-),男,黑龙江五常人,教授,硕士,研究方向:海运安全与管理;李辉(1973-),女,辽宁锦州人,副教授,硕士,研究方向:英语语言学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71731003,71473023,71603036);国家社科基金重大研究专项项目(18VHQ005);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(17YJCZH050)

Abstract

Abstract: Straits/Canals are the important nodes on the maritime Silk Road, and the safety of them has a significant impact on daily operation of the maritime Silk Road, so it is necessary to investigate the safety of straits/canals. In this paper, a full-ranking slack-based measure(SBM)model with undesirable outputs is proposed, which could reveal the full ranking of safety efficiency of straits/ canals. If one indicator has no effect on the safety efficiencies of straits/canals, the indicator should be eliminated, by which this paper makes a screening on the indicators system. The key influencing factors of safety efficiency of different straits/ canals are determined by measuring the impact on efficiency of decision making units for individual index. The empirical results show that the Malacca Strait is highly efficient, while the Mandeb Strait is low efficient. The other four straits/canals are medium-ranked and have little difference. Piracy and ship accidents are important factors affecting safety efficiencies of straits/canals.

Key words: Maritime Silk Road, strait/canal, safety efficiency

摘要： 海峡/运河是海上丝绸之路的重要节点,其安全性决定海上丝绸之路能否正常运行,因而研究海峡/运河的安全性至关重要。本文通过改进松弛变量度量模型(SBM),构造了基于非期望要素的SBM集成性排序方法,揭示了海峡/运河安全效率的完全排序;根据删除某指标不影响效率排序则应剔除该指标的思路,筛选最优评价指标体系;通过计算某指标对决策单元效率的影响程度,确定海峡/运河安全效率关键影响因素。实证结果表明,马六甲海峡安全效率较高,而曼德海峡安全效率较低,其余四个海峡/运河效率居中,且相差不大;海盗和船舶事故是影响安全效率的重要因素。

关键词: 海上丝绸之路, 海峡/运河, 安全效率

CLC Number:

U6-9

GONG Xiao-xing, LV Jing, LI Hui. Safety Efficiency of Strait/Canal on the Maritime Silk Road[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(3): 173-182.

宫晓婞, 吕靖, 李辉. 海上丝绸之路关键海峡/运河安全效率研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 173-182.

References

[1] King J. The security of merchant shipping[J]. Marine Policy, 2005, 29(3): 235-245.
[2] Pham J P. Iran’s Threat to the strait of hormuz: a realist assessment[J]. American Foreign Policy Interests, 2010, 32(2): 64-74.
[3] Chen S T, Wall A, Davies P, et al. A human and organisational factors(HOFs)analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS-Maritime accidents(HFACS-MA)[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 60(1): 105-114.
[4] Vander Hoorn S, Knapp S. A multi-layered risk exposure assessment approach for the shipping industry[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015,78(1): 21-33.
[5] GÖrçün Ö F, Burak S Z. Formal safety assessment for ship traffic in the istanbul straits[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 207(22): 252-261.
[6] Wang J, Li M, Liu Y, Zhang H, Zou W, Cheng L. Safety assessment of shipping routes in the South China Sea based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 62(2): 46-57.
[7] Qu X, Meng Q, Suyi L. Ship collision risk assessment for the singapore strait[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2011, 43(6): 2030-2036.
[8] 史春林,李秀英.霍尔木兹海峡安全对中国进口石油供应和运输影响[J].中国软科学,2013,(7):1-15.
[9] 史春林,李秀英.朝鲜海峡安全问题与中国的战略对策[J].东疆学刊,2014,31(4):53-58.
[10] 韦朝晖.马六甲海峡安全影响因素分析——马六甲海峡安全与沿岸国家的外交选择系列研究之一[J].学术论坛,2007,(2):55-59.
[11] 吕靖,王爽.我国海上运输关键节点安全评价研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2015,15(1):30-36.
[12] 吕靖,高天航.海上通道关键节点安全保障效率研究[J].中国软科学,2015,(10):1-8.
[13] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
[14] Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell C A K. The measurement of efficiency of production[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985.
[15] Charnes A, Haag S, Jaska P, et al. Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the additive model of data envelopment analysis[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 1992, 23(5): 789-798.
[16] Färe R, Grosskopf S. Network dea[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2000, 34(1): 35-49.
[17] Lewis H F, Sexton T R. Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2004, 31(9): 1365-1410.
[18] Tone K, Tsutsui M. Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(1): 243-252.
[19] McDonald J. Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(2): 792-798.
[20] 陈伟,沙蓉,张永超,等.我国知识密集型产业专利创新绩效评价研究——基于DEA-Malmquist指数方法[J].管理评论,2013,25(8):39-45.
[21] 陈凯华,官建成,寇明婷,等.网络DEA模型在科技创新投资效率测度中的应用研究[J].管理评论,2013,25(12):3-14.
[22] Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3): 498-509.
[23] Tone K. Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: a slacks-based measure(SBM)approach[R]. GRIPS Research Report Series, 2003, 5: 1-16.
[24] Lozano S, Gutiérrez E. Slacks-based measure of efficiency of airports with airplanes delays as undesirable outputs[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2011, 38(1): 131-139.
[25] Chang D S, Yang F C. Assessing the power generation, pollution control, and overall efficiencies of municipal solid waste incinerators in taiwan[J]. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(2): 651-663.
[26] 胡鞍钢,郑京海,高宇宁,等.考虑环境因素的省级技术效率排名(1999~2005)[J].经济学(季刊),2008,7(3):933-960.
[27] 王兵,吴延瑞,颜鹏飞.中国区域环境效率与环境全要素生产率增长[J].经济研究,2010,(5):95-109.
[28] 赵宇哲,周晶淼,匡海波.欧盟ETS下航空运输企业的能源效率评价研究——基于时间窗的非径向DEA模型[J].管理评论,2015,27(5):38-47.
[29] 贾国柱,刘圣国,孟楷越.基于改进DEA模型的建筑业循环经济效率评价研究[J].管理评论,2014,26(4):14-21.
[30] Cui Q, Li Y. The change trend and influencing factors of civil aviation safety efficiency: the case of Chinese airline companies[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 75(1): 56-63.
[31] 卞亦文,许皓.基于虚拟包络面和TOPSIS的DEA排序方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(2):482-488.
[32] Wang Y M, Luo Y. DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 173(2): 902-915.
[33] Reinhar S, Lovell CAK, Thijssen G. Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: an application to dutch dairy farms[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 81(1): 44-60.
[34] Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford S. Foundation of data envelopment analysis for pareto-koopmans efficient empirical production functions[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1985, 30(1-2): 91-107.
[35] 朱宁,王兵,于之倩.基于DEA的银行绩效研究综述[J].金融评论,2015,(2):100-122.
[36] 李骁,薛力.21世纪海上丝绸之路:安全风险及其应对[J].太平洋学报,2015,23(7):50-64.
[37] 匡海波,陈树文.中国港口生产效率研究与实证[J].科研管理,2007,28(5):170-177.
[38] 李卫海.中国海上航运的安保模式及其法律保障——以应对21世纪海上丝路的海盗为例[J].中国社会科学,2015,(6):131-151.

Safety Efficiency of Strait/Canal on the Maritime Silk Road

海上丝绸之路关键海峡/运河安全效率研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	YANG Zhong-zhen, CHEN Dong-xu, GONG Zhi-guang. Study on the Investment of Container Port along the Maritime Silk Road in the Context of Industry Transfer [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(7): 52-57.
[2]	YANG Zhong-zhen, CHEN Dong-xu, GONG Zhi-guang. Study on the Investment of Container Port along the Maritime Silk Road in the Contest of Industry Transfer [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(5): 119-124.
[3]	CHEN Fu-ying, ZHANG Jian-tong, LUO Mei-feng. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Positions of the Ports along “21Maritime Silk Road” [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(1): 157-164.
[4]	ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Yong-qing, HUANG Xia. Analysis on Stability of Cooperation in the Maritime Silk Roadbased on Evolutionary Game Theory [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(4): 54-61.