The Timing Choice Model and Empirical Study of Overseas Regional Technology Platform Investment

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0049

Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 110-116.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0049

• Application Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

The Timing Choice Model and Empirical Study of Overseas Regional Technology Platform Investment

WU Chong^1,2, BO Si-yi², ZHANG Shi-fan²

1. Business School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
2. Business School, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Received:2020-04-12 Online:2021-02-25

海外区域技术平台投资的时机选择模型及实证研究

吴崇^1,2, 薄思怡², 张诗帆²

1.南京大学商学院,江苏南京 210093;
2.南京信息工程大学商学院,江苏南京 210044

作者简介:吴崇(1970-),男,安徽桐城人,教授,博士,研究方向:战略管理、创新管理;薄思怡(1996-),女,江苏苏州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:人力资源管理;张诗帆(1996-),女,江苏苏州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:财务管理。
基金资助:
教育部人文社科规划基金(19YJA630085);江苏省社科基金面上项目(18GLB025)

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the first phase of “mature technology product promotion” and the second phase of “new technology product development” in overseas regional technology platform(RTP)investment of backwardness enterprise, this paper constructs a two-stage real option model. Further, based on OFDI sample of Chinese listed companies in manufacturing industry, this paper empirically analyzes the decisive factors and effects of RTP investment timing choice. The research results show that, the smaller exogenous uncertainty in the first stage, the larger endogenous uncertainty in the second stage, and the larger the growth option for new product projects, the more the enterprises tend to RTP invest as soon as possible. Furthermore, under the different conditions of endogenous and exogenous uncertainties in the two stages, the investment timing of RTP has a significant difference effect on the innovation growth of enterprises.

Key words: regional technology platform, investment timing choice, enterprise innovation growth

摘要： 基于后发企业海外区域技术平台(RTP)投资中“成熟技术产品推广”和“新技术产品开发”两个阶段,本文构建了两阶段实物期权模型。进一步,利用中国制造业对外直接投资(OFDI)的上市公司样本,考察了RTP投资时机选择的决定因素及影响效果。研究发现,第一阶段外生不确定性越低、第二阶段内生不确定性越高、新技术产品项目的增长期权越大,企业越倾向于尽早地RTP投资于海外市场;在两阶段内外生不确定性的不同条件下,RTP投资时机相应地对企业创新增长产生了显著的差异影响。

关键词: 区域技术平台, 投资时机选择, 企业创新增长

CLC Number:

F832.48

WU Chong, BO Si-yi, ZHANG Shi-fan. The Timing Choice Model and Empirical Study of Overseas Regional Technology Platform Investment[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(2): 110-116.

吴崇, 薄思怡, 张诗帆. 海外区域技术平台投资的时机选择模型及实证研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 110-116.

References

[1] Kogut B, Kulatilaka N. Options thinking and platform investments: investing in opportunity[J]. California Management Review, 1994, 36(2): 52-71.
[2] Gilroy B, Lukas E. The choice between greenfield investment and cross-border acquisition: a real option approach[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2006, 46(3): 447-465.
[3] Liu X, Gao L, Lu J, Lioliou E. Environmental risks, localization and the overseas subsidiary performance of MNEs from an emerging economy[J]. Journal of World Business, 2016, 51(3): 356-368.
[4] Dellestrand H. Subsidiary embeddedness as a determinant of divisional headquarters involvement in innovation transfer processes[J]. Journal of International Management, 2011, 17(3): 229-242.
[5] Hurry D, Miller A T, Bowman E H. Calls on high-technology: japanese exploration of venture capital investments in the United States[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13(2): 85-101.
[6] 桑百川.“走出去”战略:效果、问题与变革取向[J].国际贸易,2017,(5):12-15.
[7] 李准,李强,曾勇.增长期权的执行、创造与资产风险溢价——企业生命周期的视角[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(10):1-9.
[8] 王超发,孙静春.货币政策、非国有企业投资与R&D项目中的共享型复合实物期权价值预期[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(12):86-94.
[9] Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under uncertainty[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
[10] 黄学军,吴冲锋.不确定环境下研发投资决策的期权博弈模型[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(5):33-37.
[11] Salorio R E. Foreign direct investment and investment under uncertainty[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1996, 27(2): 335-357.
[12] 周超,苏冬蔚.产能过剩背景下跨国经营的实物期权价值[J].经济研究,2019,54(1):22-37.
[13] 吴崇,胡汉辉.基于实物期权视角的企业国际化研究进展评析与趋势展望[J].外国经济与管理,2012,34(4):29-38.
[14] Ahsan M, Musteen M. Multinational enterprises' entry mode strategies and uncertainty: a review and extension[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2011, 13(4): 376-392.
[15] Fisch J H. Internalization and internationalization under competing real options[J]. Journal of International Management, 2008, 14(2): 108-123.
[16] 曹勇,程前,周蕊.专利申请时机对创新绩效的影响[J].科学学研究,2018,36(10):1914-1920.
[17] Rokkan A I, Heide J B, Wathne K H. Specific investments in marketing relationships: expropriation and bonding effects[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2003, 40(2): 210-224.
[18] Capel J. How to service a foreign market under uncertainty: a real option approach[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 8(3): 455-475.
[19] Chi T, Li J, Trigeorgis L G, Tsekrekos A E. Real options theory in international business[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50(4): 525-553.
[20] Brito J B, Sampayo F M. The timing and probability of FDI: an application to US multinational enterprises[J]. Applied Economics, 2005, 37(4): 417-437.
[21] Kouvelis P, Axarloglou K, Sinha V. Exchange rates and the choice of ownership structure of production facilities[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(8): 1063-1080.
[22] Tony T W, Li J. Real options and MNE strategies in asia pacific[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2008, 25(1):153-169.
[23] 周铭山,张倩倩.“面子工程”还是“真才实干”? ——基于政治晋升激励下的国有企业创新研究[J].管理世界,2016(12):116-132.
[24] 吴崇,张诗帆,薄思怡.研发国际化模式选择能否促进企业创新[J].中国科技论坛,2020(6):26-36.
[25] Brouthers K D, Brouthers L, Werner S. Real options, international entry mode choice and performance[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(5): 936-60.
[26] Shaver J M. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: does entry mode choice affect FDI survival[J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(4): 571-585.

The Timing Choice Model and Empirical Study of Overseas Regional Technology Platform Investment

海外区域技术平台投资的时机选择模型及实证研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 8

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	LI Ru-xia, HU Wen-xiu, QI Xiao-liang. The Applications of Utility function and Entropy of Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set in Risk Decision-Making [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(5): 102-109.
[2]	LI Juan, XIA Deng-feng, FEI Wei-yin. The Optimal Investment Strategy with Stochastic Inflation Risk Based on Semimartingale Theory [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(5): 188-192.
[3]	DU Jin-zhu, HU Wen-xiu, ZHANG Jian-feng. Growth Difference, Information Disclosure and Cost of Equity Capital [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(3): 198-208.
[4]	HUANG Dong-bin, ZHOU Dan-dan, WANG Yong. Strength of Preference on Effective Factors Integratedwith CVaR Portfolio Choice Model [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(3): 24-30.
[5]	HUANG Dong-bin, SUN Hong-wei, ZUO Chuan-chang. Judgment on Short Term Trends and Portfolio Choices Optimization [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(10): 164-173.
[6]	WANG Chuan-yu, FU Chun-yan, SHENG Guo-xiang. Optimal Investment of DC Pension under the Inflation and Minimum Guarantee [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(2): 193-199.
[7]	WANG Su-sheng, KANG Yong-bo. Information Disclosure System, Corporate Venture Capital Information Disclosure and Corporate Value [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(12): 92-103.
[8]	YANG Xi, WANG Su-sheng, PENG Ke. Venture Capital and the Operational Performanceof Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms:Disentangling the Ex-post Effect From the Ex-ante Effect [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(6): 144-154.