信用期下时滞变质品供应链库存和定价的Stackelberg均衡策略

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0198

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 76-85.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0198

信用期下时滞变质品供应链库存和定价的Stackelberg均衡策略

董坤祥¹, 侯文华¹, 陈宗泽², 丁慧平^1,3

1.南开大学商学院,天津 300071;
2.爱荷华大学管理科学系,美国爱荷华州 IA 52242;
3.青岛农业大学经济与管理学院,山东青岛 266109

收稿日期:2013-12-21 出版日期:2015-12-25
作者简介:侯文华(1964-),通讯作者,男,河北邢台人,教授、博士生导师,研究方向为服务外包、供应链协调等;董坤祥(1988-),男,山东陵县人,博士研究生,研究方向为供应链金融,服务外包;陈宗泽(1986-),男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,博士研究生,研究方向为动态网络定价;丁慧平(1976-), 女,山东日照人,讲师,博士研究生,研究方向:电子商务外包。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071080);国家社科基金资助项目(15BGL074)

Inventory and Price Stackelberg Equilibrium Policies of Non-instantaneous Deteriorating Items Supply Chain with Trade Credit

DONG Kun-xiang¹, HOU Wen-hua, CHEN Zong-ze², DING Hui-ping^1,3

1.Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
2.Department of Management Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa city, IA 52242, USA;
3.School of Economic and Management, Qingdao Agriculture University, Qingdao, 266019, China

Received:2013-12-21 Online:2015-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在允许缺货和考虑资金机会成本情况下,根据时滞变质品的基本库存模型,分别构建了信用期下供应商为领导者(SL)和零售商为领导者(RL)的Stackelberg博弈模型。通过分析SL和RL下的Stackelberg博弈模型唯一均衡解,得到两个模型中均衡解的解析表达式。最后,根据数值算例分析得出:(1)在SL供应链中信用期并不总使整个供应链协调,然而在RL供应链中信用期的协调效果较好;(2)延长信用期或增加零售价格均能刺激零售商多订货;(3)在两个模型中,零售价格均随变质时刻递增,且整条供应链达到Pareto改进;(4)SL中供应商变动信用期与RL中零售商变动价格相比,SL供应链收益更高;而当信用期和价格固定,其他参数变动时,RL供应链收益更大。

关键词: 库存, 信用期, 时滞变质品, Stachekelberg博弈

Abstract: Based on the inventory model of non-instantaneous deteriorating items, two kinds of inventory models(supplier as the leader-SL & retailer as the leader-RL), by considering shortage and cash time cost, based on Stackelberg game for non-instantaneous deteriorating items under trade credit are developed. The equilibrium solutions of the two models are obtained by analyzing the Stackelberg game model. Finally, our results of the numerical examples show: (1)Trade credit is not always an appropriate way to coordinate the whole supply chain in SL, while it is much better for the supply chain with the RL; (2)And prolonging the trade credit or improving sales price can increase the order quantity; (3)The sales price is increasing with deterioration time, and the whole chain gets the Pareto improvement in both SL and RL models; (4)Comparing supplier changes the trade credit period in SL with changing the sale price in RL, the profit of SL is much higher when changing the trade credit period in SL; however, when the trade credit period and price are fixed, the profit of RL is much higher.

Key words: inventory, trade credit, no-instantaneous deteriorating items, stackelberg game

中图分类号:

C931

董坤祥, 侯文华, 陈宗泽, 丁慧平. 信用期下时滞变质品供应链库存和定价的Stackelberg均衡策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(6): 76-85.

DONG Kun-xiang, HOU Wen-hua, CHEN Zong-ze, DING Hui-ping. Inventory and Price Stackelberg Equilibrium Policies of Non-instantaneous Deteriorating Items Supply Chain with Trade Credit[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(6): 76-85.

参考文献

[1] Ferguson M E, Ketzenberg M E. Information sharing to improve retail product freshness of perishables[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2006, 15(1): 57-73.
[2] Wu K S, Ouyang L Y, Yang C T. An optimal replenishment policy for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with stock-dependent demand and partial backlogging[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 101(2): 369-384.
[3] Ouyang L Y, Wu K S, Yang C T. A study on an inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with permissible delay in payments[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2006, 51(4): 637-651.
[4] Chung K J. A complete proof on the solution procedure for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with permissible delay in payment[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(1): 267-273.
[5] Geetha K V, Uthayakumar R. Economic design of an inventory policy for non-instantaneous deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments[J]. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 2010, 233(10): 2492-2505.
[6] Tsao Y C. Two phase pricing and inventory management for deteriorating and fashion goods under trade credit[J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2010, 72(1): 107-127.
[7] Musa A, Sani B. Inventory ordering policies of delayed deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 136(1): 75-83.
[8] Maihami R, Nakhai K I. Joint pricing and inventory control for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with partial backlogging and time and price dependent demand[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 136(1): 116-122.
[9] Maihami R, Nakhai K I. Joint control of inventory and its pricing for non-instantaneously deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments and partial backlogging[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2012, 55(5-6): 1722-1733.
[10] Soni H N, Patel K A. Joint pricing and replenishment policies for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with imprecise deterioration free time and credibility constraint[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013, 66(4): 944-951.
[11] Soni H N. Optimal replenishment policies for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with price and stock sensitive demand under permissible delay in payment[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(1): 259-268.
[12] Shah N H, Soni H N, Patel K A. Optimizing inventory and marketing policy for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with generalized type deterioration and holding cost rates[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(2): 421-430.
[13] Dye C Y. The effect of preservation technology investment on an on-instantaneous deteriorating inventory model[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(5): 872-880.
[14] Kouvelis P, Zhao W. Financing the newsvendor: supplier vs. bank, and the structure of optimal trade credit contracts[J]. Operations Research, 2012, 60(3): 566-580.
[15] Zhou Y W, Zhong Y G, Li J C. An uncooperative order model for items with trade credit, inventory dependent demand and limited displayed-shelf space demand and limited displayed-shelf space[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 233(1): 76-85.
[16] Zhou Y W, Zhou D. Determination of the optimal trade credit policy: a supplier-Stackelberg model[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2012, 64(7): 1030-1048.
[17] 胡劲松,胡玉梅.模糊环境下考虑缺货和延期支付Stackelberg均衡策略[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(2):87-94.
[18] Shi X J, Zhang S M, Trade credit: the interaction of financing, marketing, operations, and risk behavior[J]. Review of Management Science, 2014, 8(2): 225-248.
[19] Chern M S, Pan Q, Teng J T, et al. Stackelberg solution in a vendor-buyer supply chain model with permissible delay in payments[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(1): 397-404.
[20] Xiao T J, Xu T T. Coordinating price and service level decisions for a supply chain with deteriorating item under vendor managed inventory[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 145(2): 743-752.
[21] 许甜甜,肖条军.基于数量折扣的时滞变质物品库存协调模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(7):1690-1698.
[22] 徐贤浩,聂思玥.零售商主导的短生命周期产品供应链订货策略[J].管理科学学报,2009,12(4):83-93.
[23] 赵道致,吕昕.零售商主导供应链中考虑供应商公平偏好的VMI模型[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(3):45-52.
[24] Almehdawe E, Mantin B. Vendor managed inventory with a capacitated manufacturer and multiple retailers: retailer versus manufacturer leadership[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 128(1): 292-302.
[25] Naimi S A, Mozafari M, Karimi B. Manufacturer-retailer supply chain coordination: a bi-level programming approach[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2012, 45(1): 144-152.
[26] 易余胤.不同主导力量下的闭环供应链模型[J].系统管理学报,2010,19(4):389-396.
[27] Abad P L. Optimal pricing and lot-sizing under conditions of perishability and partial backordering[J]. Management Science, 1996, 42(8): 1093-1104.

信用期下时滞变质品供应链库存和定价的Stackelberg均衡策略

Inventory and Price Stackelberg Equilibrium Policies of Non-instantaneous Deteriorating Items Supply Chain with Trade Credit

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨华龙, 于泽涛, 辛禹辰. 考虑横向整合战略的库存路径动态区域定价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 153-161.
[2]	王婧, 杨志. 基于不同角色下的做市商制金融市场模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 139-143.
[3]	余牛, 罗福, 郑本荣. 不确定需求下的网络代销平台返利优化决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 35-41.
[4]	尉迟群丽, 何正文, 王能民. 考虑缺货的闭环供应链选址-库存-路径集成优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 53-60.
[5]	徐小峰, 孙玉萍, 林姿汝. 缺货情形下轴辐式库存的纵横向协作调拨[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 113-119.
[6]	孙月, 邱若臻. 联合订货下基于ø-散度的多产品库存鲁棒优化模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 97-106.
[7]	禹海波, 那娜, 李媛, 唐中君. 需求可变性降低对均值CVaR约束销售努力决策库存系统的影响[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 102-112.
[8]	张云丰, 龚本刚, 桂云苗. 时滞变质品供应链的数量折扣协调模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 99-106.
[9]	朱学义, 吕延荣. 灰色关联度法在工业企业去库存中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 166-171.
[10]	刘勤明, 叶春明, 吕文元. 考虑中间库存缓冲区的多目标设备不完美预防维修策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 126-131.
[11]	李猜, 耿娜, 王春鸣. 基于MDP的血小板库存最优订货策略和使用策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 108-117.
[12]	段永瑞,徐超,霍佳震. 服务水平约束下动态定价与库存管理[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 1-7.
[13]	王林, 郑贵莲, 曾宇容. 考虑资源约束和数量折扣的联合补货-选址库存协同优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(1): 17-26.
[14]	毕文杰,吴湖龙. 搜寻成本下可替代产品的定价策略与库存决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(8): 63-70.
[15]	刘璐, 吴军, 李健, 杨丰梅. 考虑合同保质期的快速失效药品的二级供应链库存策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(7): 1-9.