基于时间度的动态直觉模糊多属性妥协决策

doi:10.12005/orms.2016.0048

运筹与管理 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 83-89.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2016.0048

基于时间度的动态直觉模糊多属性妥协决策

陈伟,杨早立,周文,陈恒

哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2014-06-02 出版日期:2016-04-25
作者简介:陈伟(1957-),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为技术创新与知识产权管理;杨早立(1986-),男,博士生,研究方向为创新评价与多属性决策;周文(1984-),男,博士生,研究方向为创新评价与复杂网络;陈恒(1964-)男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为技术创新管理。
基金资助:
国家软科学基金资助项目(2010GXS513173,2013GXS5B190);国家自然科学基金资助项目(70903015);黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目(G201209)

Dynamic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Compromise Decision Making Method Based on Time Degrees

CHEN Wei, YANG Zao-li, ZHOU Wen, CHEN Heng

School of Economy and Management,Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

Received:2014-06-02 Online:2016-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对当前动态直觉模糊多属性决策方法存在的不足,提出一种基于时间度的动态直觉模糊妥协决策方法。引入时间度准则,基于逼近理想解法融合主客观两类赋权法,获得兼顾主观偏好和样本客观信息的时序权重,克服现有时序权重主观赋值的随意性,同时运用直觉模糊熵(IFE)确定不同时序状态下各属性权重;根据动态直觉模糊加权几何算子(DIFWG)集结不同时序直觉模糊决策矩阵,构造动态直觉模糊综合决策矩阵,并利用VIKOR法,提供兼顾群体效用最大化与个体后悔最小化的各方案妥协折中排序,得到与理想解最近的妥协方案;以分布式创新企业合作伙伴选择为例,验证该方法在实际决策过程中的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 时间度, 动态直觉模糊, VIKOR法, 妥协决策

Abstract: In view of the deficiencies of current dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods, a compromised one based on time degrees was proposed. The principle of time degrees was introduced, and the subjective and objective weighting methods were synthesized based on technique for preference by similarity to ideal solution, obtaining sequential weights which combine both of subjective preference and objective information of samples, to overcome the randomness of subjectively determining the sequential weights; and intuitionistic fuzzy entropy(IFE)was applied to determine the attribute weights under different time sequence .Then different periods of intuitionistic fuzzy decision matrices were integrated by using dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy weighted geometric(DIFWG)operator to construct dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy comprehensive decision matrix, and the compromised ranking was provided based on VIKOR method considering both of maximum “group effectiveness” and minimum “individual regret”, obtaining the compromise scheme which was the closest to ideal solution. Finally, an example of partner selection of distributed innovation enterprise was given to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the presented method.

Key words: time degrees, dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy, VIKOR method, compromise decision

中图分类号:

C934

陈伟,杨早立,周文,陈恒. 基于时间度的动态直觉模糊多属性妥协决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(2): 83-89.

CHEN Wei, YANG Zao-li, ZHOU Wen, CHEN Heng. Dynamic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Compromise Decision Making Method Based on Time Degrees[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(2): 83-89.

参考文献

[1] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.
[2] Yager R. OWA aggregation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of General Systems, 2009, (38): 617-641.
[3] Tan C, Chen X. Intuitionistic fuzzy choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, (37): 149-157.
[4] 万树平,董九英.基于三角直觉模糊数Choquet积分算子的多属性决策方法[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(3):121-129.
[5] Xu Z S, Yager R R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of GeneralSystem, 2006, 35(4): 417-433.
[6] Xu Z S. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making[J]. Information Science, 2007, 177(11): 2363-2379.
[7] Xu Z S. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(6): 1179-1187.
[8] 梁昌勇,戚筱雯,张俊岭等.基于诱导型区间直觉模糊混合算子的群决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2012,27(6):759-771.
[9] Wei G W. Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011(38): 11671-11677.
[10] 李鹏,吴君民,朱建军.基于新直觉模糊距离的随机决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(1):1-8.
[11] Yue Z L. TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.013.
[12] Dymova L, Sevastjanov P. A new approach to the rule-base evidential reasoning in the intuitionistic fuzzy setting[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2014,61: 109-117.
[13] Iancu C. Intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures based on Frank t-norms family[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2014, 42: 128-136.
[14] Su Z X, Chen M Y, Xia G P. An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38: 15286-15295.
[15] Park J H, Cho H J, Kwun Y C. Extension of the VIKOR method to dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2013, 65: 731-744.
[16] 曹霞,刘国巍,付向梅等.基于偏好和动态直觉的产学研合作伙伴选择群决策分析[J].运筹与管理 ,2013,(4):33-41.
[17] 刘勇,Jeffrey F.刘思峰等.基于区间直觉模糊的动态多属性灰色关联决策方法[J].控制与决策 ,2013,(9):1303-1308,1321.
[18] Chen S M, Tan J M. Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994, 67: 163-172.
[19] Hong D H, Choi C H. Multicriteria fuzzy problems based on vague set theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114: 103-113.
[20] Xu Z, Yager R. Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2008, 48(1): 246-262.
[21] Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1988(18): 183-190.
[22] 张小芝,朱传喜.时序多属性决策的广义等级偏好优序法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(11):2852-2858.
[23] 张堃,王雪,张才坤等.基于IFE动态直觉模糊法空战多目标威胁评估[J].系统工程与电子技术,2014,36(4):697-701.
[24] Opricovic S, Tzeng G H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 445-455.
[25] Alistair Bowden. Knowledge for free: distributed innovation as a source of learning[J]. Public Policy and Administration, 2005, 20(3): 56-68.

基于时间度的动态直觉模糊多属性妥协决策

Dynamic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Compromise Decision Making Method Based on Time Degrees

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics