基于修正区间模糊Shapley值的“一带一路”PPP项目利益分配模型

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0161

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 168-175.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0161

基于修正区间模糊Shapley值的“一带一路”PPP项目利益分配模型

王亦虹^1,2, 田平野¹, 邓斌超¹, 戎娜娜¹

1.天津理工大学管理学院,天津 300384;
2.天津理工大学中东欧研究院,天津 300384

收稿日期:2019-07-26 出版日期:2021-05-25
通讯作者: 田平野(1997-),男,天津人,硕士研究生,研究方向为PPP项目治理、工程经济。
作者简介:王亦虹(1974-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为PPP项目运作、工程项目治理等;邓斌超(1985-),男,江西鹰潭人,讲师,博士,研究方向为公共项目治理、博弈机理;戎娜娜(1995-),女,河北石家庄人,硕士研究生,研究方向为项目治理、工程管理。
基金资助:
天津市科技计划项目(18ZLZXZF00590);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71602144);天津市教委人文社科重大项目(2017JWZD15)

Benefit Distribution Model of “The Belt and Road”PPP Project Based on Modified Interval Fuzzy Shapley Value

WANG Yi-hong^1,2, TIAN Ping-ye¹, DENG Bin-chao¹, RONG Na-na¹

1. School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China;
2. Institute of Central and Eastern Europe, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China

Received:2019-07-26 Online:2021-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 多方合作的“一带一路”基础设施PPP项目是互联互通的基石,公平合理地分配项目利益则是保障其顺利实施的关键。为了构建科学的利益分配模型,考虑项目参与方组建的合作联盟预期收益为模糊数且分配时受多种因素影响,本文首先,基于区间模糊Shapley值构建“一带一路”PPP项目利益分配初始模型;然后,识别出利益分配影响因素并量化参与方的投入分担程度,据此修正初始的利益分配模型;最后,结合实际案例,将该模型与现存方法进行对比分析,结果显示本模型的可操作性更强,针对影响因素系数的测算更为精准,整体具有显著优势。

关键词: 利益分配, 模糊联盟, 区间模糊Shapley值, “一带一路”PPP项目

Abstract: “The Belt and Road” infrastructure PPP projects under multi-party cooperation are the foundation of connectivity. To ensure effective implementation ofprojects requires a scientific distribution of benefits. To build a reasonable profit distribution model, we argue that the expected benefits of the cooperative alliance established by the project participants are fuzzy and affected by many factors. Firstly, this paper builds an initial benefit distribution model which is constructed based on interval fuzzy Shapley value,then the influence factors of benefit distribution are identified and the input sharing degree of participants is quantified to introduce the initial model for correction, and based on this, the benefit distribution model based on the modified interval fuzzy Shapley value is further obtained. Finally, thispaperapplies this model to examples. The results show this model can accurately measure the influence factor, which has significant advantages as a whole.

Key words: benefit distribution, fuzzy cooperative coalition, interval fuzzy Shapley values, The Belt and Road PPP project

中图分类号:

F407.9

王亦虹, 田平野, 邓斌超, 戎娜娜. 基于修正区间模糊Shapley值的“一带一路”PPP项目利益分配模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 168-175.

WANG Yi-hong, TIAN Ping-ye, DENG Bin-chao, RONG Na-na. Benefit Distribution Model of “The Belt and Road”PPP Project Based on Modified Interval Fuzzy Shapley Value[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(5): 168-175.

参考文献

[1] 赵蜀蓉,杨科科,龙林岸.“一带一路”基础设施建设中PPP模式面临的风险与对策研究[J].中国行政管理,2018(11):73-78.
[2] 李原.构建“一带一路”基础设施合作成本分摊机制[J].经济问题探索,2018(12):81-91.
[3] 叶晓甦,吴书霞,单雪芹.我国PPP项目合作中的利益关系及分配方式研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(19):36-39.
[4] Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of economic behavior[M]. Princeton University Press, 1994.
[5] Kim S. Cooperative game theoretic online routing scheme for wireless network managements[J]. Communications Iet, 2010, 4(17): 2074-2083.
[6] Timmer J, Borm P, Tijs S. On three shapley-like solutions for cooperative games with random payoffs[J]. International Journal of Game Theory, 2004, 32(4): 595-613.
[7] Shapley L S. A value for n-persons games[J]. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 1953, (28): 307-318.
[8] 胡石清.社会合作中利益如何分配？——超越夏普利值的合作博弈“宗系解”[J].管理世界,2018,34(6):83-93.
[9] 胡丽,张卫国,叶晓甦.基于SHAPELY修正的PPP项目利益分配模型研究[J].管理工程学报, 2011, 25(2):149-154.
[10] 常雅楠,王松江.激励视角下的PPP项目利益分配——以亚投行支撑中国企业投资GMS国家基础设施项目为例[J].管理评论,2018,30(11):257-265.
[11] 高洁,周衍平.Shapley值在植物品种权价值链利益分配中的应用[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(2):168-172.
[12] 于晓辉,孙红霞,石一丁,周鸿.模糊条件下的企业产学研预期收益分配研究[J].运筹与管理,2016, 25(5):258-263.
[13] Aubin J P. Mathematical methods of game and economic theory[M]. North-holland Amsterdam, 1980.
[14] Aubin J P. Cooperative fuzzy games[J]. Mathematical Operation Research, 1981, 6: 1-13.
[15] Mareš M. Fuzzy cooperative games[M]. Berlin, Germany Springer, 2001.
[16] Masayo T, Tetsuzo T, Masahiro I. A Shapley function on a class of cooperative fuzzy games[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(3): 596-618.
[17] Yu X H, Zhang Q. An extension of cooperative fuzzy games[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2010, 161(11): 1614-1634.
[18] Meng F Y, Zhang Q. The Shapley function for fuzzy cooperative games with multilinear extension form[J]. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2010, 23(5): 644-650.
[19] Meng F Y, Chen X H, Zhang Q. Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy Shapley hybrid operators and their application in multi-attribute decision making[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2015, 28: 599-607.
[20] Zhang W K, Ju Y B, Liu X Y. Multiple criteria decision analysis based on Shapley fuzzy measures and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 105(Complete)28-38.
[21] Gao J, Yang X, Liu D. Uncertain Shapley value of coalitional game with application to supply chain alliance[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 17: 551-556.
[22] 谭春桥,张强.具有区间联盟值n人对策的Shapley值[J].应用数学学报,2010,33(2):193-203.
[23] 于晓辉,周鸿,邹正兴,孙红霞.基于区间与模糊Shapley值的合作收益分配策略[J].运筹与管理, 2018,27(8):149-154.
[24] 王树文.“一带一路”PPP模式中风险分析及风险规避路径选择[J].东岳论丛,2016,37(5):68-75.
[25] 常雅楠,王松江.一带一路背景下基础设施PPP项目风险分担研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(16):102-105.
[26] 张丽媛,李涛.三角模糊偏好下冲突型多属性群决策方法研究[J].运筹与管理,2019,28(2):45-51.
[27] Wan S P, Wang F, Lin L L, Jiu-Ying Dong. Some new generalized aggregation operators for triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 93: 286-301.
[28] Dong M, Li S, Zhang H. Approaches to group decision making with incomplete information based on power geometric operators and triangular fuzzy AHP[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(21): 7846-7857.
[29] Qin Q, Liang F, Li L. A TODIM-based multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 55: 93-107.
[30] Van Laarhoven P J M, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of saaty's priority theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11(1): 229-241.
[31] Li H X, Huang Y X, Tian S C. Risk probability predictions for coal enterprise infrastructure projects in countries along the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2019, 69: 110-117.
[32] Duan F, Ji Q, Liu B Y, Fan Y. Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China's Belt & Road Initiative[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 535-547.
[33] Huang Y Y. Environmental risks and opportunities for countries along the Belt and Road: Location choice of China's investment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 211: 14-26.
[34] 亓霞,柯永建,王守清.基于案例的中国PPP项目的主要风险因素分析[J].中国软科学,2009,(5):107-113.
[35] 李琪.高铁走出去PPP项目风险分担与利益分配研究[D].西南交通大学,2017.
[36] 汪勇杰,陈通,邓斌超.公共文化PPP项目风险分担的演化博弈分析[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(5):21-27.
[37] 陈伟,张永超,马一博,田世海.基于AHP-GEM-Shapley值法的低碳技术创新联盟利益分配研究[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(4):220-226.
[38] 卢纪华,潘德惠.基于技术开发项目的虚拟企业利益分配机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2003(5):61-64.

基于修正区间模糊Shapley值的“一带一路”PPP项目利益分配模型

Benefit Distribution Model of “The Belt and Road”PPP Project Based on Modified Interval Fuzzy Shapley Value

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	南江霞, 魏骊晓, 李登峰, 张茂军. 基于个人超出值的模糊联盟合作博弈最小二乘预核仁[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 77-82.
[2]	周志刚, 阮丽娟, 丁秋楷. 企业创新网络中跨组织知识共享行为的演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 83-90.
[3]	南江霞, 关晶, 王盼盼. 基于Choquet积分的直觉模糊联盟合作博弈的Shapley值[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 41-46.
[4]	南江霞, 卜红, 李登峰. 直觉模糊联盟合作博弈的非线性规划模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 43-48.
[5]	王选飞, 吴应良, 黄媛. 基于合作博弈的移动支付商业模式动态联盟企业利益分配研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7): 29-38.
[6]	杨怀珍, 霍玉龙, 李雷. 基于ANP方法改进的集中控制型VMI&TPL模式的利益分配机制[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(10): 81-87.
[7]	孙红霞. 基于Choquet积分形式的模糊联盟核心[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(1): 93-99.
[8]	高璟, 张强. 模糊联盟合作对策的收益分配研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(6): 65-70.
[9]	聂翠平, 张强, 赵璇. 基于图对策的收益分配[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(4): 1-5.