中国股指期现货市场间的非对称风险溢出效应——基于分位数Granger因果检验

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0265

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了揭示中国股指期现货市场之间风险溢出效应的非对称特征,本文利用已实现半方差将中国股指期现货市场的风险区分为下跌风险和上涨风险,并运用均值Granger因果检验和分位数Granger因果检验,考察两市场之间下跌风险溢出效应和上涨风险溢出效应的差异。研究发现,中国股指期现货市场之间不仅存在显著的下跌风险溢出,还存在显著的上涨风险溢出,而且溢出效应随着分位数区间不同而呈现出显著的非对称特征。一方面,期货市场对现货市场的下跌风险溢出在全部分位数区间均显著,而上涨风险溢出仅在分布的中间位置和上尾显著。另一方面,现货市场对期货市场的下跌风险溢出主要集中在尾部极端分位数区间,而上涨风险溢出主要集中在分布的中间位置和低分位数区间。

关键词: 股指期货, 半方差, Granger因果关系, 分位数回归, 非对称性

Abstract: Facing financial market risk coming from negative and positive changes in prices, the psychology and behavior of investors might substantially differ. In this regard, we hypothesize that risk transmission mechanism between Chinese stock market and its index futures market might also substantially differ. Considering that, this paper decomposes Chinese stock market volatility and its index futures market volatility into downside semivariance and upside semivariance respectively, which can serve as a measure of downside risk and upside risk, using realized semivariance with 5-minute high frequency data from January 4, 2016 to April 30, 2019. Then this paper utilizes Granger non-causality test in mean and quantiles to distinguish risk spillovers between Chinese stock and futures market due to negative returns and positive returns, in order to reveal asymmetries in risk spillovers that emerge due to downside risk and upside risk. The analysis is conducted in a comparative way by using both Granger non-causality test in mean and quantiles. The results show that there exist both significant downside risk spillovers and significant upside risk spillovers between Chinese stock and futures market, and it provides ample evidence showing the asymmetry at quantile level, which is in contrast with the symmetry at mean level. On one hand, the downside risk spillovers from the futures market to the stock market are significant at all quantile intervals, while the upside risk spillovers from the futures market to the stock market are only significant at middle quantile intervals and extremely high quantile intervals. On other hand, the downside risk spillovers from the stock market to the futures market are significant at extreme quantile intervals, while the upside risk spillovers from the stock market to the futures market are significant at low quantile intervals and middle quantile intervals.

Key words: stock index futures, semivariance, Granger causality, quantile regression, asymmetry

中图分类号:

F832.5

任仙玲, 孙文岳. 中国股指期现货市场间的非对称风险溢出效应——基于分位数Granger因果检验[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 190-197.

REN Xian-ling, SUN Wen-yue. Asymmetric Risk Spillovers between the Chinese Stock Market and Index Futures Market Based on Granger Non-causality Test in Quantiles[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(8): 190-197.

参考文献

[1] Barndorff-Nielsen O E, Kinnebrock S, Shephard N. Measuring downside risk-realised semivariance//Bollerslev T, Russell J R, Watson M W. Volatility and time series econometrics: essays in honor of Robert F. Engle[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. 117-136.
[2] Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Diebold F X, Ebens H. The distribution of realized stock return volatility[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, 61(1): 43-76.
[3] 陈声利,李一军,关涛.基于四次幂差修正HAR模型的股指期货波动率预测[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(01):57-71.
[4] Patton A J, Sheppard K. Good volatility, bad volatility: signed jumps and the persistence of volatility[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2015, 97(3): 683-697.
[5] Xie N, Wang Z, Chen S, Gong X. Forecasting downside risk in China's stock market based on high-frequency data[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 517: 530-541.
[6] Gong X, Wen F, Xia X H, Huang J, Pan B. Investigating the risk-return trade-off for crude oil futures using high-frequency data[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 196: 152-161.
[7] Baruník J, Koáenda E, Vácha L. Asymmetric connectedness on the U.S. stock market: bad and good volatility spillovers[J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2016, 27: 55-78.
[8] Caloia F G, Cipollini A, Muzzioli S. Asymmetric semi-volatility spillover effects in EMU stock markets[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2018, 57: 221-230.
[9] Wang X, Wu C. Asymmetric volatility spillovers between crude oil and international financial markets[J]. Energy Economics, 2018, 74: 592-604.
[10] Chuang C, Kuan C, Lin H. Causality in quantiles and dynamic stock return-volume relations[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009, 33(7): 1351-1360.
[11] You W, Guo Y, Peng C. Twitter's daily happiness sentiment and the predictability of stock returns[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2017, 23: 58-64.
[12] Reboredo J C, Ugolini A. Quantile causality between gold commodity and gold stock prices[J]. Resources Policy, 2017, 53: 56-63.
[13] 许启发,伯仲璞,蒋翠侠.基于分位数Granger因果的网络情绪与股市收益关系研究[J].管理科学,2017,30(03):147-160.
[14] Granger C W J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods[J]. Econometrica, 1969, 37(3): 424-438.
[15] Granger C W J. Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1980, 2: 329-352.
[16] Andrews D W K. Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point[J]. Econometrica, 1993, 61(4): 821-856.
[17] 史永东,李竹薇,陈炜.中国证券投资者交易行为的实证研究[J].金融研究,2009,(11):129-142.
[18] 于全辉,孟卫东.牛熊市投资者情绪与上证综指的协整关系研究[J].预测,2010,29(05):53-56,67.
[19] 王相宁,李月.整体视角下的投资者过度自信实证研究[J].数理统计与管理,2010,29(06):1115-1123.
[20] 何诚颖,张龙斌,陈薇.基于高频数据的沪深300指数期货价格发现能力研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2011,28(05):139-151.
[21] 张璐,万迪昉,王文虎,万方.投资者净持仓量与期货市场稳定性——基于分类账户数据的经验研究[J].预测,2018,37(01):56-61.
[22] 何兴强,周开国.牛、熊市周期和股市间的周期协同性[J].管理世界,2006,(04):35-40.