节能情形下制造企业动态批量生产策略与节能方式选择

doi:10.12005/orms.2018.0124

运筹与管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 177-185.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2018.0124

节能情形下制造企业动态批量生产策略与节能方式选择

欧阳建军^1,2, 沈厚才¹, 罗子灿¹

1.南京大学工程管理学院,江苏南京 210093;
2.石河子大学经济与管理学院,新疆石河子 832003

收稿日期:2016-07-30 出版日期:2018-05-25
作者简介:欧阳建军(1978-),男,湖南省隆回人,博士研究生,研究方向为运营管理;沈厚才(1964-),男,江苏姜堰人,博士,教授,博士生导师, 研究方向为运营管理;罗子灿(1982-),男,湖南省株洲人,博士研究生,研究方向为运营管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目 (71671085,71071074); 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目 (CXLX13_56);石河子大学人文社科中青年科研人才培养基金(RWSK15-Y06)

Optimal Lot-sizing and Choice of Energy Saving Modes for a Manufacturer with Improving Energy Efficiency

OUYANG Jian-jun^1,2, SHEN Hou-cai¹, LUO Zi-can¹

1.School of Engineering and Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
2.School of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China

Received:2016-07-30 Online:2018-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着诸多严厉的环保政策的实行,节能管理已成为我国高耗能制造企业运营管理中的一个重要内容。通过构建自我节能、节能效益分享和节能量保证三种节能方式下制造企业的动态批量生产决策模型,首先分析了给定节能方式下制造企业的最优动态批量生产策略,其次探讨了制造企业最优节能方式选择。结果表明,最优动态批量生产策略满足“零库存生产”规则。进一步的数值实验分析结果表明:面临前两种节能方式时,当节能服务公司与制造企业的节能投资成本系数比率和采用合同能源管理的预计节能率较小时,制造企业应选择后者,反之应选择前者;面临后两种节能方式时,当采用合同能源管理的预计节能率较小时,制造企业选择两者无差异,反之应选择前者。

关键词: 节能管理, 节能服务公司, 合同能源管理, 动态经济批量模型

Abstract: With the implementation of many stringent environmental policies, improving energy efficiency has played an important role in operations management for those energy-intensive manufacturers in China. In this paper, we first analyze the optimal lot-sizing for an energy-intensive manufacturer with improving energy efficiency, and then study the optimal choice of energy saving modes for the manufacturer by formulating dynamic lot size models under three types of energy saving modes, i.e., self-saving, shared savings and guaranteed savings. Our results show that the optimal lot-sizing satisfies “zero-inventory” rules. Through numerical study, we further show that: (1)the manufacturer will prefer the second mode to the first when the investment cost coefficient ratio of the energy service company to the manufacturer and the predicted energy-saving rate of energy performance contracting are both small; otherwise, the manufacturer will prefer the first mode to the second; (2)the manufacturer will choose the second mode or the third mode, when the predicted savings rate of energy performance contracting is small; otherwise, the manufacturer will prefer the second mode to the third mode.

Key words: energy saving management, energy service company, energy performance contracting, dynamic economic lot size model

中图分类号:

F273

欧阳建军, 沈厚才, 罗子灿. 节能情形下制造企业动态批量生产策略与节能方式选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(5): 177-185.

OUYANG Jian-jun, SHEN Hou-cai, LUO Zi-can. Optimal Lot-sizing and Choice of Energy Saving Modes for a Manufacturer with Improving Energy Efficiency[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(5): 177-185.

参考文献

[1]Larsen P H, Goldman C A, Satchwell A et al. energy service company industry: market size and project performance from 1990-2008[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 50(11): 802-820.
[2]杨锋,何慕佳,梁樑.基于多属性逆向拍卖的节能服务公司选择研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(5):98-106.
[3]徐晓燕,吴焕焕.基于博弈论的节能量保证型EPC合同决策分析[J].运筹与管理,2015(3):112-119.
[4]Fawkes S. Outsourcing energy management: saving energy and carbon through partnering[M]. Gower Publishing, Ltd., 2007.
[5]Sorrell S. The economics of energy service contracts[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(1): 507-521.
[6]田小平.基于交易成本经济学的节能服务外包决策研究[J].中南财经政法大学,2011,4:101-106.
[7]Vine E. An international survey of the energy service company(ESCO)industry[J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(5): 691-704.
[8]Bertoldi P, Rezessy S, Vine E. Energy service companies in european countries: current status and a strategy to foster their development[J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(14): 1818-1832.
[9]Goldman C A, Hopper N C, Osborn J G. Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data[J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(3): 387-405.
[10]Hopper N, Goldman C, Mcwilliams J, et al. Public and institutional markets for ESCO services: comparing programs, practices and prformance[J]. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 2005.
[11]Singer T, Lockhart N. IEA DSM task X-performance contracting-country report: united states[J]. International Energy Agency, Paris, 2002.
[12]Ouyang J, Shen H. The choice of energy saving modes for an energy-intensive manufacturer considering non-energy benefits[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141: 83-98.
[13]Ouyang J, Ju P. The choice of energy saving modes for an energy-intensive manufacturer under non-coordination and coordination scenarios[J]. Energy, 2017, 126: 733-745.
[14]Wagner H M, Whitin T M. Dynamic version of the economic lot size model[J]. Management Science, 1958, 5(1): 89-96.
[15]Robinson P, Narayanan A, Sahin F. Coordinated deterministic dynamic demand lot-sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms[J]. Omega, 2009, 37(1): 3-15.
[16]Wolsey L A. Progress with single-item lot-sizing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 86(3): 395-401.
[17]Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models[J]. Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2013, 10(1): 99-116.
[18]Bookbinder J H, Tan J Y. Strategies for the probabilistic lot-sizing problem with service-level constraints[J]. Management Science, 1988, 34(9): 1096-1108.
[19]Gong X, Zhou S X. Optimal production planning with emissions trading[J]. Operations Research, 2013, 61(4): 908-924.
[20]Chen F. Sales force Incentives, market information, and production/inventory planning[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(1): 60-75.
[21]Goldman C A, Osborn J G, Hopper N C, et al. Market trends in the U.S. ESCO industry: results from the NAESCO database project[J]. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 2002.
[22]郑玲玲.福建省合同能源管理的现状、存在的问题和对策[J].能源与环境,2013,(3):7-9.
[23]Wang T, Thomas D J, Rudi N. The effect of competition on the efficient-responsive choice[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(5): 829-846.
[24]Wang Z, Hu M. Committed versus contingent pricing under competition[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(11): 1919-1936.

节能情形下制造企业动态批量生产策略与节能方式选择

Optimal Lot-sizing and Choice of Energy Saving Modes for a Manufacturer with Improving Energy Efficiency

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘惠敏, 檀灵慧, 胡梦月, 秦俊杰, 褚海涛. 既有建筑合同能源管理中的政府角色——基于模糊Shapley值的研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 213-221.
[2]	张文杰, 袁红平. 合同能源管理项目中的节能补贴分配问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 233-238.
[3]	张文杰, 袁红平. 合同能源管理中超额节能收益分配问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(1): 187-193.
[4]	徐晓燕, 吴焕焕. 基于博弈论的节能量保证型EPC合同决策分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(3): 112-119.