基于传递性的效率评价及改进

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0133

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 212-216.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0133

基于传递性的效率评价及改进

黄衍^1,2, 王应明¹

1.福州大学经济与管理学院,福建福州 350108;
2.福建农林大学计算机与信息学院,福建福州 350028

收稿日期:2019-05-15 出版日期:2021-04-25
通讯作者: 王应明 (1964-),男,教授,博士生导师,从事决策理论与方法、数据包络分析、规则库推理、质量功能展开等研究。
作者简介:黄衍 (1983-),女,副教授,博士,从事多属性决策、相似性结构的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(72001042);福建省自然科学基金项目(2019J01399)

Efficiency Evaluation and Improvement Based on Transitivity

HUANG Yan^1,2, WANG Ying-ming¹

1. School of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China;
2. College of Information and Computer Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forest University, Fuzhou 350028, China

Received:2019-05-15 Online:2021-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现有交叉效率矩阵中往往会存在一些同行效率评价远低于自我效率评价的情形,即出现同行间的恶意评价。本文将第三方作为间接元素,考虑到这些间接元素在效率评价矩阵中具有传递性,引入间接判断结果对原有的交叉效率矩阵进行反复迭代,并证明迭代过程的最终稳定性。迭代的最终结果可以消除效率矩阵中的恶意评价元素,得到新的效率评价矩阵。最后,通过算例来说明模型的可行性和实用性。

关键词: 效率评价矩阵, 传递闭包矩阵, 模糊算子

Abstract: Cross-efficiency evaluation, as an extension tool of data envelopment analysis(DEA), has been widely applied in evaluating and ranking decision making units(DMUs). Unfortunately, the baleful evaluation among peers makes the efficiency valued impractical. In this paper, the third party is regarded as an indirect element. Considering that these indirect elements are transitive in the efficiency evaluation matrix, the indirect judgment results are introduced to iterate the original cross-efficiency matrix repeatedly, and the final stability of the iteration process is proved. Finally a numerical example shows the applications and flexibility of the model in this paper.

Key words: efficiency evaluation matrix, transitive closure matrix, fuzzy operator

中图分类号:

C934
O221

黄衍, 王应明. 基于传递性的效率评价及改进[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 212-216.

HUANG Yan, WANG Ying-ming. Efficiency Evaluation and Improvement Based on Transitivity[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(4): 212-216.

参考文献

[1] Charnes W W,Cooper Rhoes E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J].European Journal of Operation Research,1978,2(6): 429-444.
[2] 王有森,许皓.基于数据包络分析的并行生产系统效率评价方法[J].运筹学学报,2015,19(4):25-36.
[3] Sexton T R,Silkman R H,Hogan A J.Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions[J].New Directions for Program Evaluation,1986,32: 73-105.
[4] Doyle J,Green R.Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations,meanings and the uses[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,1994,45: 567-578.
[5] Wang Y M,Chin K S.A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37: 3666-3675.
[6] Li W H,Liang L,Cook W,et al.Dea models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurations[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2016,254(3): 946-956.
[7] Kao C,Liu S T,Omega,et al.Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems[J].Omega,2018,83: 70-79.
[8] Huang Y,Wang Y M.Pareto approach for DEA cross efficiency evaluation based on interval programming[J].Journal of Intelligent &Fuzzy Systems,2017,33(4): 2375-2389.
[9] 张兴贤,王应明.一种基于区间信度结构的混合型多属性决策方法[J].控制与决策,2019,34(1):183-191.
[10] 李琳,黄海军,汪寿阳等.基于DEA/AR博弈交叉效率方法的学术期刊评价研究[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(4):118-126.
[11] Liang L,Wu J,Cook W D,et al.The DEA game cross efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium[J].Operations Research,2008,56(5): 1278-1288.
[12] Wu J,Sun J S,Liang L.Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model[J].Computers &Industrial Engineering,2012,63: 513-519.
[13] Wang Y M,Chin K S,Wang S.DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation[J].Journal of Operational Research Society,2012,63: 1079-1088.
[14] Jahanshahloo G R,Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F,Jafari Y,et.al.Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation[J].Applied Mathematical Modeling,2011,35: 544-549.
[15] Lam K F.In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,2010,61: 134-143.
[16] Ramon N,Ruiz J L,Sirvent I.On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2010,207: 1564-1572.
[17] Cook W D,Harrison J,Imanirad R J,et al.Data envelopment analysis with non-homogeneous DMUs[J].Operations Research,2013,61(3): 666-676.
[18] 刘燕,陈英武,周长峰等.两型社会市民生活满意度评价指数模型实证研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2015,07:1847-1854.

基于传递性的效率评价及改进

Efficiency Evaluation and Improvement Based on Transitivity

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	董纪阳, 何万里. 集中通勤接送服务的最小化成本模型及算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 28-34.
[2]	李进军, 李婷婷, 包玉娥, 陈明浩. 区间毕达哥拉斯模糊幂几何-几何Heronian平均算子及其在多属性群决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 78-83.
[3]	曾小春, 李随成, 高琨. 基于突变级数的我国区域技术有效供给发展状况动态评价——模糊奖惩特征的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 158-164.
[4]	崔春生, 曹艳丽, 邱闯闯, 郭玉洁, 王美琦, 臧振春. 基于证据理论和Vague集的多属性群决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 1-5.
[5]	商波, 黄涛珍. 可再生能源配额制下异质权力发电商的绿色生产决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 6-13.
[6]	宋云婷, 于安琪, 吴迪, 赵伟杰,田玺环. 出口海陆仓融资决策多目标优化模型与算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 14-18.
[7]	陶希闻, 江文奇. 面向直觉模糊集排序能力提升的记分函数设计研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 34-39.
[8]	张新卫, 冯琼, 李靖, 同淑荣. 基于2可加模糊测度的多线性效用函数建模和求解[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 113-119.
[9]	侯芳. 基于随机优胜连接行为的犹豫模糊群组评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 183-189.
[10]	赵连霞, 张小峰, 岳超楠, 王芳晴, 尤建新. 供应商生产违规下政府与核心企业审查策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 203-210.
[11]	张琳彦, 陈鸣, 徐倩, 张健. 考虑非期望因素的决策单元排序:两阶段综合效率法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 57-63.
[12]	陈鹏宇. 线性无量纲化方法对比及反向指标正向化方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 95-101.
[13]	孙彦永, 闫相斌, 孙弘宇, 宋亚楠. 基于KPI-AHP方法的价值创造驱动因素分析——以河北联通面向责任体的关键绩效指标体系为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 120-126.
[14]	徐选华, 余艳粉, 陈晓红. 基于属性关联的不完全风险偏好信息大群体应急决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 1-8.
[15]	闫妍, 张锦, 唐秋宇, 张洪基. 航线联盟下航空货运网络枢纽点选址问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 64-72.