基于矩阵距离时序赋权的科学技术评价模型及应用

运筹与管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 166-178.

基于矩阵距离时序赋权的科学技术评价模型及应用

石宝峰, 迟国泰, 章穗

大连理工大学工商管理学院,辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2013-01-01 出版日期:2014-01-25
作者简介:石宝峰(1984-)男,博士研究生,研究方向:复杂系统评价;迟国泰(1955-)男,教授,博士生导师,管理科学与工程博士,研究方向:复杂系统评价;章穗(1977-)男,博士研究生,研究方向:科技评价.
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目(06&ZD039);国家自然科学基金项目(71171031);教育部科学技术研究项目(2011-10);大连银行小企业信用风险评级系统与贷款定价项目(2012-01);中国邮政储蓄银行总行小额贷款信用风险评价与贷款定价资助项目(2009-07);2009年大连市第二批科技计划项目(2009D11ZC102)

The Science and Technology Evaluation Model Based on the Matrix Distance Sequence Weighting and Its Application

SHI Bao-feng, CHI Guo-tai, ZHANG Sui

School of Business Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received:2013-01-01 Online:2014-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据“坚持以人为本,树立全面、协调、可持续的发展观,促进经济社会和人的全面发展”的科学发展观内涵,构建了省级行政区的科学技术评价指标体系。通过在Topsis中引入矩阵距离对截面评价结果进行二次赋权,建立了基于矩阵距离时序赋权的科学技术评价模型。本文的特色与创新一是通过在Topsis中引入矩阵距离、对不同年份的综合评价结果进行客观赋权,反映了评价指标与理想状态偏离程度越小的年份、其综合评价结果赋权越大的思路。改变了现有研究人为主观确定不同时段评价结果权重的现状;改变了Topsis仅仅用于求解指标权重,无法对不同年份的综合评价结果进行赋权的现状。二是采用面板数据对典型省份的科技发展进行评价,反映评价对象历史信息对评价结果的影响。消除了流行的截面数据评价的偶然性。三是实证研究表明:山西、新疆、云南三省的科学技术发展落后的主要原因在于其三省万元GDP综合能耗过高、工业固体废物综合利用率过低。

关键词: 科学技术评价, 科学发展观, 矩阵距离, 时间权向量, Topsis法

Abstract: The Scientific Development View puts forward the basic principles: maintaining a balanced, and adhering to people-oriented and establishing a comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable development and promoting economic and social development. The comprehensive evaluating index system of science and technology is established, which is fit for province districts. This paper builds the evaluation model of science and technology based on the matrix distance sequence weighting by introducing matrix distance in Topsis on section two empowerment evaluation results. Its features and innovations are as follows. Firstly, it determines the objective weight of the comprehensive evaluation results in different years by means of introducing matrix distance in Topsis, and the empowering ideas that the smaller of the evaluating indicator with the ideal indicator, the greater of the weight, is reflected. Thus, the right time to change the existing evaluation results weights in the different periods are subjectivly determined, and to make up the existing Topsis weighting method can not solve the weight of the comprehensive evaluation results in different years. Secondly, the evaluation results of scientific and technological development reflect the effect of evaluation object’s historical information by means of panel data of province districts. It avoids the status that the evaluation results have contingency using cross-sectional data.Thirdly, the empirical result shows that the science and technology development of Shanxi, Xinjiang and Yunnan provinces has lagged behind, because their GDP comprehensive energy consumption every ten thousand Yuanis too high and their comprehensive utilization of industrial solid wastes are too low.

Key words: the evaluation of science and technology, the scientific development view, the matrix distance, the time weight vector, Topsis method

中图分类号:

N945.16
F204

石宝峰, 迟国泰, 章穗. 基于矩阵距离时序赋权的科学技术评价模型及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(1): 166-178.

SHI Bao-feng, CHI Guo-tai, ZHANG Sui. The Science and Technology Evaluation Model Based on the Matrix Distance Sequence Weighting and Its Application[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(1): 166-178.

参考文献

[1] IMD. IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2007[M]. Lausanne: IMD Press, 2007.
[2] OECD. Main science and technology indicators[M]. Paris: OECD, 2007.
[3] World Bank. 2008 World development indicators [M]. Washington D.C: World Bank Press, 2008.
[4] 中华人民共和国科学技术部.中国科学技术指标[M].北京:中国科技出版社,2004.
[5] Grupp H, Mogee M E. Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators[J]. Research Policy, 2004, (33): 1373-1384.
[6] Gao Z C, Tisdell C A. China's reformed science and technology system: an overview and assessment[J]. Prometheus, 2004, 22(3): 311-331.
[7] 汪克夷,栾金昶,武慧硕.基于组合客观赋权法的科技评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(6):129-132.
[8] 姚培龙.科技计划实施效果评价指标体系建立及模糊综合评价[J].科技管理研究,2007,(7):91-92.
[9] 李刚,周立斌,曹宏举.基于理想排序群组G2赋权的科技评价模型与实证[J].科技与管理,2010,12(3):12-15,19.
[10] 陈燕武.基于复合DEA和Malmquist指数的科技投入产出效率评价[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(6):196-204.
[11] 迟国泰,顾雪松,王卫.基于关联分析的科技评价模型及典型省份实证[J].科研管理,2011,32(1):68-78.
[12] 郭亚军,姚远,易平涛.一种动态综合评价方法及应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,(10):154-158.
[13] 曲常胜,毕军,黄蕾,李凤英,杨洁.我国区域环境风险动态综合评价研究[J].北京大学学报,2010,46(3):477-482.
[14] 顾雪松,迟国泰,程鹤.基于聚类-因子分析的科技评价指标体系构建[J].科学学研究,2010,28(4):508-514.
[15] 王元地,潘雄峰,刘凤朝.科技进步贡献率测算及预测实证研究[J].商业研究,2005,(5):28-29.
[16] 谭思明,吴宁,蓝洁.青岛市经济发展中科技进步贡献率的计量分析[EB/OL].青岛市崂山区人民政府科技创新服务平台网,http://www.laoshan.gov.cn/n206250/n519273/n538711/n538757/34688.html. 2013,10,19.
[17] 中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国科技统计年鉴2008-2010[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2008-2010.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家统计局.各省级行政区统计年鉴2008-2010[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2008-2010.
[19] 张玉玲,迟国泰,祝志川.基于变异系数-AHP的经济评价模型及中国十五期间实证研究[J].管理评论,2011,23(1):3-13.
[20] 陆金伟,达庆利.基于最小矩阵距离准则的一种群体决策方法[J].东南大学学报,1998,28(6):79-83.
[21] 钱吴永,党耀国,熊萍萍,王正新.基于灰色关联定权的TOPSIS法及其应用[J].系统工程,2008,27(8):124-126.
[22] 迟国泰,隋聪,齐菲.基于超效率DEA的科学技术评价模型及其实证[J].科研管理,2010,31(2):94-104.
[23] 余锦华,杨维权.多元统计分析与应用[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2006.176-177.