“21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线港口地位综合评价

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0020

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 157-164.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0020

“21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线港口地位综合评价

陈芙英¹, 张建同¹, 罗梅丰²

1. 同济大学经济与管理学院,上海 200092;
2. 香港理工大学物流及航运学系,中国香港 999077

收稿日期:2018-01-06 出版日期:2020-01-25
通讯作者: 张建同(1966-), 女, 北京人, 教授, 博导, 研究方向:物流与供应链, 应用统计;
作者简介:陈芙英(1990-), 女, 江西吉安人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:港口物流, 应用统计;罗梅丰(1964-), 男, 香港人, 副教授, 博导, 研究方向:港口物流, 应用统计。

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Positions of the Ports along “21Maritime Silk Road”

CHEN Fu-ying¹, ZHANG Jian-tong¹, LUO Mei-feng²

1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received:2018-01-06 Online:2020-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于复杂网络节点重要性分析方法,从海运网络分析的视角对“21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线港口参与“一带一路”建设的地位进行评价。在收集海上丝绸之路沿线102个港口实际数据的基础上,构建海上丝绸之路海运网络拓扑结构图。通过对网络中港口节点的度中心性、接近中心性、中介中心性、特征向量中心性指标进行计算,结合熵权TOPSIS法综合得到港口地位的排序。结果表明新加坡港、上海港、巴生港在网络中具有很高的地位,且现有的复杂网络节点重要性排序方法存在局限,基于熵权TOPSIS法的综合评价得到的港口排序更符合实际发展需求。最后运用节点删除法对排序结果进一步分析,为中国港口参与“一带一路”建设提供参考与建议。

关键词: 21世纪海上丝绸之路”, 海运网络, 港口地位, 熵权TOPSIS法, 复杂网络方法

Abstract: Based on the centrality indicators for node importance from complex network, this paper evaluates the positions of ports along “21 Maritime Silk Road” which participate in the construction of “Belt and Road Initiative” from the perspective of shipping network. Collecting the data of 102 ports along Maritime Silk Road, we construct the shipping network topology diagram of the ports and get the ranking of port positions by calculating degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and feature vector centrality combined with the method of Entropy-weight TOPSIS. The results show that Singapore port, Shanghai port and Klang port have high positions in “21Maritime Silk Road” shipping network. And existing complex network method of node importance ranking contains some limitations while the comprehensive evaluation method based on Entropy-weight TOPSIS is more realistic. In addition, node deletion method is used to analyze the results, and suggestions are put forward for Chinese ports in the construction of “Belt and Road Initiative”.

Key words: “21 Maritime Silk Road”, shipping network, port position, Entropy-weight TOPSIS method, complex network method

中图分类号:

U691

陈芙英, 张建同, 罗梅丰. “21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线港口地位综合评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 157-164.

CHEN Fu-ying, ZHANG Jian-tong, LUO Mei-feng. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Positions of the Ports along “21Maritime Silk Road”[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(1): 157-164.

参考文献

[1] 曾庆成,滕藤.海上丝绸之路航线网络的复杂性分析[J].中国航海,2015,38(2):122-125.
[2] 赵旭,王晓伟,周巧琳.“海上丝绸之路”背景下的港口战略联盟稳定性研究[J].大连海事大学学报,2016,42(2):117-123.
[3] Tai H H, Hwang C C. Analysis of hub port choice for container trunk lines in east asia[J]. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2008, 6: 907-919.
[4] Jiang J, Lee L H, Chew E P, et al. Port connectivity study: an analysis framework from a global container liner shipping network perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 73: 47-64.
[5] Wang Y, Cullinane K. Traffic consolidation in east asian container ports: a network flow analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 61: 152-163.
[6] Low J M W, Lam S W, Tang L C. Assessment of hub status among asian ports from a network perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2009, 43(6): 593-606.
[7] Strele V, Zimbro G, Souza J M. Group and link analysis of multi-relational scientific social networks[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2013, 86(7): 1819-1830.
[8] avuogˇlu A, lker Türker. Patterns of collaboration in four scientific disciplines of the turkish collaboration network[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2014, 413(11): 220-229.
[9] 肖连杰,吴江宁,宣照国.科研合作网中节点重要性评价方法及实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(6):12-15.
[10] Liu C, Zhou L X, Fan C J, et al. Activity of nodes reshapes the critical threshold of spreading dynamics in complex networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2015, 432: 269-278.
[11] Nandi A K, Medal H R. Methods for removing links in a network to minimize the spread of infections[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2016, 69: 10-24.
[12] 吕天阳,朴秀峰,谢文艳,黄少滨.基于传播免疫的复杂网络可控性研究[J].物理学报,2012,61(17):135-143.
[13] Zhao L, Wang J, Chen Y, et al. SIHR rumor spreading model in social networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2012, 391(7): 2444-2453.
[14] Ma J, Li Z T. Rumor spreading in online social networks by considering the bipolar social reinforcement[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2016, 447: 108-115.
[15] Paul B, Gopinathan E. An efficient data collection model using phantom partitioning to reconnect traffic partitioned node in wireless sensor network structure[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 70: 640-648.
[16] Cheng J, Bertolini L, Clercq F L, et al. Understanding urban networks: comparing a node-, a density- and an accessibility-based view[J]. Cities, 2013, 31(2): 165-176.
[17] Yang Y, Xie G. Efficient identification of node importance in social networks[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2016, 4(1): 1-12.
[18] Figueiredo C, Chen W, Azevedo J. Central nodes and surprise in content selection in social networks[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 51: 382-392.
[19] Agryzkov T, Oliver J L, Tortosa L, et al. A new betweenness centrality measure based on an algorithm for ranking the nodes of a network[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2014, 244: 467-478.
[20] Hu P, Fan W, Mei S. Identifying node importance in complex networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2015, 429: 169-176.
[21] 李宗育,王劲松,徐晏琦.基于多属性决策的复杂网络节点攻击研究[J].电光与控制,2016,22(1):1-9.
[22] 谭跃进,吴俊,邓宏钟.复杂网络中节点重要度评价的节点收缩方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006(11):79-83.
[23] 于会,刘尊,李勇军.基于多属性决策的复杂网络节点重要性综合评价方法[J].物理学报,2013,62(2):54-62.
[24] Agha Mohammad Ali Kermani M, Badiee A, Aliahmadi A, et al. Introducing a procedure for developing a novel centrality measure(Sociability Centrality)for social networks using TOPSIS method and genetic algorithm[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 56: 295-305.
[25] 朱乾,徐淑琼.基于熵权TOPSIS法的社会网络节点影响力评价研究[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2016,18(1):42-46.

“21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线港口地位综合评价

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Positions of the Ports along “21Maritime Silk Road”

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics