资质过剩感知与员工时间侵占行为的关系研究:自我决定感和威权领导的作用

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0272

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 203-209.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0272

资质过剩感知与员工时间侵占行为的关系研究:自我决定感和威权领导的作用

后玉蓉², 吴群琪^1,2, 桂嘉伟^1,3

1.长安大学综合运输经济管理研究中心,陕西西安 710064;
2.长安大学经济与管理学院,陕西西安 710064;
3.长安大学运输工程学院,陕西西安 710064

收稿日期:2020-07-03 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-09-14
作者简介:吴群琪(1956-),男,广东大埔人,博士,教授、博士生导师,研究方向为交通系统经济分析、综合运输经济理论;后玉蓉(1995-),女,甘肃卓尼人,硕士研究生,研究方向为人力资源管理;桂嘉伟(1993-),男,浙江杭州人,博士研究生,研究实习员,研究方向为综合运输经济理论。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71702084);教育部人文社会科学青年项目(17YJC630112);交通运输部交通运输战略规划政策研究项目(2018-7-9;2018-16-9)

Research on the Relationship BetweenPerceived Overqualification and Employees' Time Banditry Behavior: the Role of Self-determination and Authoritarian Leadership

HOU Yu-rong², WU Qun-qi^1,2, GUI Jia-wei^1,3

1. Center of Comprehensive Transportation Economic Management, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China;
2. School of Economics and Management,Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China;
3. College of Transportation Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China

Received:2020-07-03 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-09-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以资源保存理论和自我决定理论为切入点,探讨了资质过剩感知与员工时间侵占行为的关系及自我决定感和威权领导在两者之间的作用机制。以402名企事业员工为对象的调查研究显示:资质过剩感知正向影响员工时间侵占行为;自我决定感在资质过剩感知与员工时间侵占行为之间起到了部分中介作用;威权领导调节了资质过剩感知与自我决定感之间的关系,同时调节了资质过剩感知通过自我决定感的降低影响员工时间侵占行为的间接效应。

关键词: 资质过剩感知, 员工时间侵占行为, 自我决定感, 威权领导

Abstract: Drawing upon conservation of resource theory and self-determination theory, this study aims to explore the influential mechanism between perceived overqualification and employees' time banditry behavior. The study investigated 402 employees from diverse occupations in China. The result of data analysis shows that: Perceived overqualification significantly and positively affects employees' time banditry behavior; Self-determination plays a partial mediating role between perceived overqualification and employees' time banditry behavior. Authoritarian leadership positively moderates the link of perceived overqualification and self-determination. In other words, the higher authoritarian leadership is, the stronger negative relationship between perceived overqualification and self-determination. In addition, authoritarian leadership moderates the mediating effect of self-determination, and the mediating effect of self-determination is stronger when authoritarian leadership is higher.

Key words: perceivedoverqualification, employees' time banditry behavior, self-determination, authoritarian leadership

中图分类号:

C931

后玉蓉, 吴群琪, 桂嘉伟. 资质过剩感知与员工时间侵占行为的关系研究:自我决定感和威权领导的作用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(8): 203-209.

HOU Yu-rong, WU Qun-qi, GUI Jia-wei. Research on the Relationship BetweenPerceived Overqualification and Employees' Time Banditry Behavior: the Role of Self-determination and Authoritarian Leadership[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(8): 203-209.

参考文献

[1] 赵李晶,张正堂,宋锟泰,陈钰瑶.基于资源保存理论的资质过剩与员工时间侵究占行为关系研究[J].管理学报,2019,16(4):506-513.
[2] Erdogan B, Bauer T N, Peiró J M, Truxillo D M. Overqualification theory research and practice: things that matter[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 4(2): 260-267.
[3] Maynard D C, Joseph T A, Maynard A A M. Underemployment job attitudes and turnover intentions[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(4): 509-536.
[4] Liu S Q, Wang M. Perceived overqualification: a review and recomendations for research and practice[J]. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-Being, 2012, 10(10) : 1-42.
[5] 赵李晶,张正堂,宋锟泰.资质过剩对员工建言行为的影响机制研究——内部人身份认知和心理特权的作用[J].经济经纬,2018,35(6):105-110.
[6] 丁秀玲,王慧,赵李晶.员工资质过剩的成因、影响及管理策略——高质量发展语境的审视[J].江海学刊,2019(2):238-242.
[7] Luksyte A, Spitzmueller C. When are overqualified employees creative? it depends on contextual factors[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016, 37(5): 635-653.
[8] Lobene E V, Meade A W, Pond S B. Perceived overqualification: a multi-source investigation of psychological predisposition and contextual triggers[J]. Journal of Psychology, 2015, 149(7): 684-710.
[9] Verbruggen M, van Emmerik H, van Gils A E J, Meng C M, de Grip A. Does early-career underemployment impact future career suceess? a path dependency perspective[J]. Joumal of Vocational Behavior, 2015, 90(5): 101-110.
[10] 王雁飞,林星驰,张静茹.组织中的时间侵占行为研究进展述评[J].外国经济与管理,2015,37(9):45-56.
[11] 李锡元,蔡瑶.威权领导与员工的时间侵占:工作嵌入负面影响的研究[J].商业经济与管理,2018(1):37-48.
[12] 姜薇薇,于桂兰,孙乃纪.新生代员工管理对策研究[J].兰州学刊,2014(1):130-136.
[13] 邵康华,廖纮亿,陈沁悦.威权领导对员工亲组织非伦理行为的影响——一个有调节的中介模型[J].软科学,2020,34 (5):76-81.
[14] Deci E L, Ryan R M. The‘what'and‘'why'of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2000 (11): 227-268.
[15] 黄勇,彭纪生.资历过高感知与组织公民行为:组织自尊和心理脱离的作用[J].中国人力资源开发,2017(5):69-78.
[16] 段锦云,杨静,朱月龙.资源保存理论:内容、理论比较及研究展望[J].心理研究,2020,13(1):49-57.
[17] 叶笛,林东清.信息系统开发团队知识整合的影响因素分析——基于相似性理论与社会融合的研究视角[J].科学学研究,2013,31(5): 711-720.
[18] 赵慧娟,龙立荣.基于多理论视角的个人——环境匹配、自我决定感与情感承诺研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(6):836-846.
[19] 袁凌,李博涛,李健.伦理型领导对员工犬儒主义的影响——基本心理需要和集体主义倾向的作用[J].华东经济管理,2017,31(7):5-13.
[20] 张燕,怀明云.威权式领导行为对下属组织公民行为的影响研究:下属权力距离的调节作用[J].管理评论,2012,24(11):97-105.
[21] 赵燕梅,张正堂,刘宁,丁明智. 自我决定理论的新发展述评[J].管理学报,2016,13(7):1095-1104.
[22] 张怡凡,陈默,唐宁玉.威权领导与员工创造力:心理依赖的视角[J].中国人力资源开发,2019,4(7):85-99.
[23] Mumford M D, Fried Y. Give them what they want or give them what they need? ideology in the study of leadership[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, 35(5): 622-634.
[24] Fine S, Nevo B. Too smart for their own good? a study of perceived cognitive overqualifification in the workforce[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2008, 19(2): 346-355.
[25] AnjaVan den Broeck, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Hans De Witte, Soenens B, Lens W. Capturing autonomy competence and relatedness at work: construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2010, 3(4): 981-1002.
[26] Bennett R J, Robinson S L. Development of a measure of workplace deviance[J]. Journal of Applified Psychology, 2000, 85(3): 349-360.
[27] 郑伯埙,周丽芳,樊景立.家长式领导量表:三元模式的建构与测量[J].本土心理学研究,2000(14):3-64.
[28] Hayes A F.Introduction to mediation moderation and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach[M]. New York:The Guilford Press, 2013.
[29] HayesA F. An index and test of linear moderated mediation[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2015, 50(1): 1-22.

资质过剩感知与员工时间侵占行为的关系研究:自我决定感和威权领导的作用

Research on the Relationship BetweenPerceived Overqualification and Employees' Time Banditry Behavior: the Role of Self-determination and Authoritarian Leadership

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	何珮洋, 李昆鹏, 李文莉. 智能制造环境下的备件生产与运输协同调度问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(8): 93-100.
[2]	冯琬娟, 贾涛. 决策层背景多样性何以影响企业技术创新投资导向？——股权结构的调节效应检验[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 139-146.
[3]	温焜, 余星. 天气影响产出下订单农业质量分级模式协调机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 176-181.
[4]	刘海潮, 王阳, 范琼瑜. 考虑人员培训的任务指派问题模型及算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 68-73.
[5]	金正浩, 赵希男, 姜哲贻. 行业结构环境的序参量分析方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 74-80.
[6]	祁凯, 彭程. 基于SEIR演化博弈模型的旅游公共危机演化与控制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 145-150.
[7]	赵昕, 张琦, 丁黎黎. 不确定环境下零售商融资决策选择:3PL融资VS银行融资[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 186-192.
[8]	杨锴, 赵希男, 周岩. 考虑层次结构的独立董事治理多优势评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 227-232.
[9]	胡卉, 刘富鑫, 王愚勤, 冯芷郁, 王瑞. 基于改进模拟退火算法的推动式生产-配送协调优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 15-22.
[10]	武乾, 黄太兴, 孙敏, 王力, 王航. 钢筋混凝土旧工业厂房结构加固方案优选[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 224-230.
[11]	刘国山, 林新宇. 柔性工期下的资源受限项目调度双目标优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 1-7.
[12]	田春英, 陈东彦, 陈兆波, 章定. 存在破产成本时保理授信下供应商赊销策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 115-122.
[13]	郭大伟, 戴更新, 马德青. 延迟效应影响下的产学研协同创新知识共享研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 224-231.
[14]	丁秋雷, 胡祥培, 位娟, 姜洋. 动态需求下蓄冷式多温共配多目标优化模型及算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 13-19.
[15]	陈恒, 杨志, 祁凯. 多方博弈情景下政产学研绿色技术创新联盟稳定性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 108-114.