运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 163-171.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0135

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

存在空箱调运的非对称运输市场定价策略研究

张晓娟, 张盛浩, 王维娜   

  1. 西安交通大学 管理学院 过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室, 机械制造系统工程国家重点实验室,陕西 西安 710049
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-13 出版日期:2015-08-12
  • 作者简介:张晓娟(1986-),女,博士研究生,主要研究方向:运营管理;张盛浩(1977-),男,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向:库存控制、供应链管理;王维娜(1984-),女,博士研究生,主要研究方向:运营管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271167);国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(70901062);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-13-0465);国家科技支撑计划(2012BAH08F06)

Optimal Pricing in an Asymmetric Transportation Market with Empty Equipment Repositioning

ZHANG Xiao-juan, ZHANG Sheng-hao, WANG Wei-na   

  1. School of Management, Key Lab of the Ministry of Education for Process Control & Efficiency Engineering, State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
  • Received:2013-06-13 Online:2015-08-12

摘要: 考虑空箱调运成本,本文对垄断和双寡头市场分别研究运输企业在两条相向路径上的定价问题。对于垄断市场,建立了运输企业最优定价策略,并刻画出无空箱调运的潜在需求不平衡区间。对于双寡头市场,考虑同一路径上不同企业潜在运输需求不等的现实情境,求解了非对称企业的伯川德纳什均衡,给出最优定价策略。研究发现,无空箱调运并不意味着较高利润,运输企业没有必要刻意消除空箱调运现象。另外,增加单位载货运输成本和竞争强度会降低企业利润,而提升单位空箱重置成本、价格敏感度和市场不对称程度都会增大企业利润。

关键词: 空箱调运, 垄断, 双寡头, 非对称市场, 定价

Abstract: This paper studies how to price transportation service between two locations in monopoly and duopoly markets, respectively. Because equipment is necessary in facilitating the transportation service, the cost of empty equipment repositioning is inevitable when the realized demands along opposite directions are unbalanced. In case of a monopoly market, we derive the optimal pricing strategy and identify the range of unbalanced potential demands under which the firm achieves balanced realized demands. In case of a duopoly market, we assume that two competing firms have different potential demands along the same transportation direction. The Bertrand competition is analyzed and the optimal pricing strategy is derived. We find that profit may be higher when firms reposition some empty equipment, which implies it is unnecessary to achieve balanced realized demands on purpose. Furthermore, profit decreases with unit loaded equipment movement cost and competition intensity, and increases with unit empty equipment repositioning cost, price sensitivity and the asymmetric degree of two firms’ potential demands.

Key words: empty equipment repositioning, monopoly, duopoly, asymmetric market, pricing

中图分类号: