产学研合作创新网络规模、连接机制与创新绩效的关系研究——基于多主体仿真和动态系统论视角

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0071

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 246-254.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0071

产学研合作创新网络规模、连接机制与创新绩效的关系研究——基于多主体仿真和动态系统论视角

曹霞¹, 刘国巍²

1.哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150001;
2.桂林航天工业学院工业管理系,广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2013-05-05 出版日期:2015-04-12
作者简介:曹霞(1975-),女,黑龙江哈尔滨人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向: 产学研合作创新、知识管理;刘国巍(1985-),男,黑龙江绥化人,博士研究生,研究方向:知识管理、管理系统工程。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71473055);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0825);中央高校基本科研业务费支持计划(HEUCF140901);教育部人文社科项目(14YJA630002);哈尔滨市科技攻关计划(2009AC9CT108)

Research on the Relationship Between Network Scale, Connection Mechanism of I-U Cooperative Innovative Network and Innovative Performance ——Based on Multi-Agent Simulation and Dynamic System Theory

CAO Xia¹, LIU Guo-wei²

1.School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China;
2.Guilin Aerospace in Dustry University, Guilin 54004

Received:2013-05-05 Online:2015-04-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示产学研合作创新网络规模与连接机制对创新绩效的影响机理,运用Agent建模理论和Netlogo仿真平台构建产学研合作创新网络的仿真模型,对不同特性(小世界、无标度)偏好下的产学研合作创新网络进行仿真实验,并运用动态系统理论解释仿真的涌现现象。研究发现:①网络平均节点度(度数中心势)与网络平均创新绩效(节点加权平均收益的对数)之间存在鞍结分叉和跨临界分叉的组合现象;②网络平均距离(关系强度)与网络平均绩效之间呈指数增长分布轨道;③连接机制与网络平均绩效呈对数增长分布轨道;④实力择优连接机制提升网络平均节点度正向作用的效率较低;⑤随机组合择优连接机制更有利于提升小世界偏好网络平均距离的正向作用;⑥度择优连接机制更有利于提升无标度偏好网络平均创新绩效。

关键词: 产学研合作, 网络规模, 连接机制, 创新绩效, 动态系统

Abstract: In order to reveal the influence between network scale, connection mechanism of I-U cooperative innovative network and innovative performance, we simulate the I-U cooperative innovative network model based on agent model and NetLogo platform, and explain the emergent phenomena with dynamic systems theory. According to our research, we find that there is a saddle-node bifurcation and transcritical bifurcation combination phenomenon between average number of network nodes and average performance of innovative network. The distribution for average distance and average performance of network is an exponential growth orbit. The distribution for connection mechanism and average performance of network is a logarithmic growth orbit. The efficiency to improve positive effect of average number of network nodes with preferential attachment mechanism based on strength is low. The preferential attachment mechanism based on random combination is more conducive to promoting the positive effect of small-world preferences network average distance.The preferential attachment mechanism based on degree is more conducive to promoting the average innovative performance of scale-free preference network.

Key words: technology economy and management, innovation of I-U cooperation, network scale, connection mechanism, innovative performance, dynamic system

中图分类号:

C931.1

曹霞, 刘国巍. 产学研合作创新网络规模、连接机制与创新绩效的关系研究——基于多主体仿真和动态系统论视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(2): 246-254.

CAO Xia, LIU Guo-wei. Research on the Relationship Between Network Scale, Connection Mechanism of I-U Cooperative Innovative Network and Innovative Performance ——Based on Multi-Agent Simulation and Dynamic System Theory[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(2): 246-254.

参考文献

[1] Borgatti S P, Foster P C. The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology[J]. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(6): 991-1013.
[2] 冯锋,李天放.产学研两阶段R&D投入链视角下的中国区域经济增效实证研究[J].管理学报,2012,9(11):1661-1667.
[3] 于淼,荣义重.基于知识流动的产学研创新网络绩效分析[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2012,11(3):35-40.
[4] 徐忆琳.析产学研合作中的信息不对称[J].高等工程教育研究,2003,(3):38-40.
[5] 黄婷婷,鲁虹.基于多Agent模型的产学研合作机制研究[J].中国软科学增刊,2009,(S2):237-242.
[6] 吕璞,林莉.开放式自主创新背景下校企合作模型及仿真[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(22):112-118.
[7] Ray R, Bill M. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(2): 240-267.
[8] 李志刚,汤书昆,梁晓艳.产业集群网络结构与企业创新绩效关系研究[J].科学学研究,2007,25(4):777-782.
[9] Ahuja G C, Russell W, Lee P M. Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation:insight trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs[J]. Strategic management Journal, 2005, 26(9): 791-808.
[10] 刘军.社会网络分析法[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007.
[11] Kastelle T, Steen J. Are small world networks always best for innovation?[J].Innovation-management policy & practice, 2010, 12(1): 75-87.
[12] Raymond T S, Robert C L, Sandy J W. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(2): 316-325.
[13] Corsaro D, Cantu C, Tunisini A. Actors’ heterogeneity in innovation networks[J]. Industrial marketing management, 2012, 41(5): 780-789.
[14] 范群林,邵云飞,唐小我,王剑峰.结构嵌入性对集群企业创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(12):1891-1900.
[15] Csizmadia Z. Co-operation and ability for innovation: relationship network foundations of the regional innovation system[J]. Sociological Review, 2008, (2): 22-56.
[16] 马英红,李慧嘉,张晓东.赋权网络中的弱化免疫研究[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(10):32-39.
[17] Vietor G, Bart N. Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology[J]. European Management Review, 2005, 2(3): 179-197.
[18] Yli R H, Autio E, Sapienza H J. Social capital: Knowledge acquisition,and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms[J]. Strategic Manament Journal, 2001, 22(6): 587-613.
[19] Tsal W. Knowdge transfer in interorganizational networks:effects of network position and absorptive capagity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.
[20] 李文博,郑文哲,刘爽.产业集群中知识网络结构的测量研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):787-791.
[21] Bakouros Y L,Samara E T. Academic liaison offices vs technology transfer units:could they form a new joint mechanism towards the exploration of academic/research results?[J].International Journal of Innovation Science, 2010, 12(20): 145-157.
[22] Annamária I. The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(6): 975-995.
[23] Philip S. US manufacturing extension partnerships: technology policy reinvented[J]. Research Policy, 2001, (30): 977-992.
[24] Smith H L, Bagchi S S. Triple helix and regional development:a perspective from oxfordshire in the UK[J]. Technology analysis & strategic management, 2010, 22(7): 805-818.
[25] Santoro M D, Chakrabarti A. Why collaborate? exploring industry’s strategic objective for establishing industry-university technology relationship[R]. Portland: Conference Proceedings PICMET, 2000.
[26] Zahra S A, George G. Absorptive capacity: a review reconceptualization and extension[J]. Academy of Management review, 2002, 27(3): 185-203.
[27] 李庆满,林海松.产学研合作绩效评价研究——基于合作过程的模糊积分分析[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(2):122-125.
[28] Barabasi A L, Bonabeau E. Scale-free networks[J]. Scientific American, 2003, (5): 50-59.
[29] Newman M E J. The structure and function of complex network[J]. SIAM Review, 2003, 45: 167-256.
[30] 苗东升.系统科学精要[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.

产学研合作创新网络规模、连接机制与创新绩效的关系研究——基于多主体仿真和动态系统论视角

Research on the Relationship Between Network Scale, Connection Mechanism of I-U Cooperative Innovative Network and Innovative Performance ——Based on Multi-Agent Simulation and Dynamic System Theory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	蒋旋, 孟庆良, 徐信辉, 孙妮妮. 双边视角下用户参与众包创新的知识获取前因及其对创新绩效的影响[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 225-231.
[2]	臧欣昱, 马永红. 协同创新视角下产学研合作行为决策机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(3): 93-103.
[3]	李新, 李柏洲, 赵健宇. 产学研合作视角下企业技术获取协同及其与创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7): 183-192.
[4]	张瑜,菅利荣,于菡子. 基于GERT网络的产学研知识流动效应度量[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(2): 282-287.
[5]	马军, 董琼, 杨德礼. 基于风险管理的动态供应链超网络均衡模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(1): 1-9.
[6]	李柏洲, 罗小芳. 基于Shapley值法的产学研合作型企业原始创新收益分配研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(4): 220-224.