基于多证据同步融合的目标辨识算法

doi:10.12005/orms.2018.0235

运筹与管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 90-96.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2018.0235

基于多证据同步融合的目标辨识算法

周莉, 郭伟震, 何月明

鲁东大学信息与电气工程学院,山东烟台 264025

收稿日期:2017-07-12 出版日期:2018-10-25
作者简介:周莉(1966-), 女, 教授, 博士,硕士生导师, 研究方向:信息融合。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大研究计划资助项目(91538201);国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(61304052)

Target Recognition Algorithm Based on Synchronous Fusionof Multiple Pieces of Evidence

ZHOU Li, GUO Wei-zhen, HE Yue-ming

School of Information &Electrical Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China

Received:2017-07-12 Online:2018-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高不同类型冲突证据融合结果的可靠性,提出基于多证据同步融合的目标辨识算法。新算法先是通过分析证据之间的冲突状况,选择适用的冲突衡量参数,并相应给出基于不同参数的证据及源自于不同证据焦元的权值计算公式;进一步,依据新的焦元权值对多证据局部冲突信息实行按权指派。实例和仿真应用结果显示,与现有常用相关算法比较,新算法具有稳定性高、使用范围广泛的优点。

关键词: D-S证据组合规则, 目标辨识, 冲突证据, 焦元

Abstract: In order to improve the reliability of the fusion results of different types of conflict evidence, a target recognition algorithm based on synchronous fusion of multiple pieces of evidence is proposed. First, by analyzing the conflict among pieces of evidence, applicable conflict measure parameters are selected in the new algorithm. And the weight calculation formulas of evidence and those of the focal element originating from different pieces of evidence based on different parameters are given. Furthermore, according to the new weight of focal element, the local conflict information can be assigned to related focal element. The simulation results show that compared with the existing algorithms, the new algorithm has the advantages of high stability and wide range of application.

Key words: D-S evidence combination rule, target recognition, conflict evidence, focal element.

中图分类号:

TP391

周莉, 郭伟震, 何月明. 基于多证据同步融合的目标辨识算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 90-96.

ZHOU Li, GUO Wei-zhen, HE Yue-ming. Target Recognition Algorithm Based on Synchronous Fusionof Multiple Pieces of Evidence[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(10): 90-96.

参考文献

[1]Yager R R. An intuitionistic view of the Dempster-Shafer belief structure[J]. Soft Computing, 2014, 18(11): 2091-2099
[2]Han D Q, Deng Y, Han C Z, Yang Y. Some notes on betting commitment distance in evidence theory[J]. Science China-Information Sciences, 2012, 55(3): 558-565.
[3]Jousselme L, Maupin P. Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2012, 53(2): 118-145.
[4]Liu W. Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 170(11): 909-924.
[5]Smests P. Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions[J]. Information Fusion, 2007, 8(4): 387-412.
[6]Liu Z G, Dezert J, Pan Q, et al. Combination of sources of evidence with different discounting factors based on a new dissimilarity measure[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 52(1): 133-141.
[7]Murphy C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts [J]. Decision support systems, 2000, 29(1): 1-9.
[8]邓勇,施文康,朱振福.一种有效处理冲突证据的组合方法[J]. 红外与毫米波学报,2004, 23(1): 27-32.
[9]宋亚飞,王晓丹,雷蕾,薛爱军.基于信任度和虚假度的证据组合方法[J]. 通信学报,2015, 36(5):104:1-6.
[10]Bi W H, Zhang A, Yuan Y. Combination method of conflict evidences based on evidence similarity[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(3): 503-513.
[11]Qian J, Guo X F, Deng Y. A novel method for combining conflicting evidences based on information entropy[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2017, 46(4):1-13.
[12]Silva L G D O, Filho A T D A. A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory[J]. Information Science. 2016, 346-347: 275-285.
[13]Deng Y. Generalized evidence theory[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2015, 43(3):530-543.
[14]权文, 王晓丹, 王坚, 张玉玺. 一种基于局部冲突分配的DST组合规则[J].电子学报, 2012, 40(9): 1880-1884.
[15]Mezai L, Hachouf F. Score level fusion algorithm using Differential Evolution and Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule[C]. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, 2017: 001051-001056.
[16]Smarandache F, Dzert J. On the consistency of PCR6 with the averaging rule and its application to probability estimation[C]. International Conference on Information Fusion. IEEE, 2013,22:1119-1126.
[17]Jousselme A L, Maupin P. Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2012, 53(2): 118-145.
[18]Destercke S, Burger T. Toward an axiomatic definition of conflict between belief functions[J]. IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2013, 43(2): 585-596.
[19]曹洁, 郭雷雷. 一种基于局部冲突分配的证据组合规则[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2013, 30(7): 2033-2035.
[20]周莉, 唐文静, 郭伟震.基于改进D-S 证据组合规则的目标识别算法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2016, 36 (5): 47-50.

基于多证据同步融合的目标辨识算法

Target Recognition Algorithm Based on Synchronous Fusionof Multiple Pieces of Evidence

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郭崇慧, 邢小宇, 魏伟. 一种基于二部图的试题知识点标注方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 71-75.
[2]	陈振, 昝哲, 贾书伟. 基于SD-VF理论的城市限行政策效应研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 190-196.
[3]	陈振, 张康辉, 贾书伟. 基于系统动力学的新能源汽车“绿色悖论”效应研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 232-239.
[4]	郭崇慧, 吕征达. 一种基于集成学习的试题多知识点标注方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 129-143.
[5]	依不拉音·吾斯曼, 郭文强, 阿布都热合曼·卡的儿, 于凯. 专业零售商与厂家直售商的多渠道供应价格博弈的混沌动力学研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(11): 54-59.
[6]	朱惠琦, 侯汉平. 对象标识统一化程度影响物流资源整合的系统动力学分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 72-80.
[7]	贾书伟, 严广乐. 基于SD-GM理论的城市交通拥堵收费模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 160-168.
[8]	段冠华, 林健, 崔春生. 基于犹豫倾向聚类的物流中心选址方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 39-44.
[9]	王鲁, 吴冲. 基于自组织映射和模糊隶属度的财务危机预警研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(12): 119-125.
[10]	李少年, 吴良刚. 基于模糊证据推理及改进TOPSIS的多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(6): 16-23.
[11]	贾书伟, 严广乐. 基于灵敏性分析的Q-MSGSID的优化及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(4): 105-111.
[12]	胡贤德, 曹蓉, 李敬明, 阮素梅, 方贤. 小微企业信用风险评估的IDGSO-BP集成模型构建研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(4): 132-139.
[13]	齐二石, 李天博, 刘亮, 赵云祥, 乔国通. 云制造环境下企业制造资源共享的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(2): 25-34.
[14]	任南, 王银, 薛静. 基于BOM的复杂产品制造WBS动态构建研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(6): 282-287.
[15]	李敬明, 阮素梅, 刘奎户. 基于改进模糊综合评价法的小微企业[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(6): 217-224.