基于社会网络视角的突发灾害应急响应合作者关系网络分析——以“6·24”叠溪滑坡灾害为例

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0116

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 103-108.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0116

基于社会网络视角的突发灾害应急响应合作者关系网络分析——以“6·24”叠溪滑坡灾害为例

汤敏^1,2, 刘斌^1,2, 李仕明¹, 李璞²

1.电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川成都 611573;
2.成都理工大学管理科学学院,四川成都 610059

收稿日期:2019-05-30 出版日期:2021-04-25
作者简介:汤敏(1981-),女,四川安岳人,副教授,博士研究生,研究方向:战略与应急管理;刘斌(1987-),男,四川眉山人,博士后,讲师,研究方向:数据挖掘、应急管理;李仕明(1953-),男,四川仁寿人,教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向:战略与应急管理;李璞(1964-),男,四川渠县人,教授,研究方向:战略管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金委重大研究计划重点项目(91224001)

Network Analysis of Sudden Disaster Emergency Response Partner Relationship Based on Social Network Perspective ——Taking the “6·24” Diexi landslide as an Example

TANG Min^1,2, LIU Bin^1,2, LI Shi-ming¹, LI Pu²

1. School of Economics and Management, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 611731, China;
2. College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

Received:2019-05-30 Online:2021-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 突发灾害应急管理实践表明,响应主体间的合作关系网络可靠性将影响应急响应的效率。本文以“6.24”新磨滑坡作为研究案例,采用文献分析、访谈、关系挖掘等研究方法构建灾害响应过程中主体间的合作者关系网络,重点从社会网络视角对该合作者关系的网络韧性进行量化分析,并对比随机生成的合作网络以及国外类似案例。研究发现,应急响应网络中的关键行动主体履行了救灾响应所要求的责任角色;在应急救援的效率方面,我国的应急救援体制具有制度优越性;指挥部等关键行动者会影响整个合作网络的效率和韧性。因此,在灾后应急救援时需进一步提升整体网络成员中协同救灾的水平,以在救援效率和效果上取得实效。

关键词: 突发灾害, 应急响应, 社会网络, 合作者关系, 网络韧性

Abstract: The emergency management practice of sudden disasters shows that the reliability of the response network between the responding subjects affects the efficiency of the emergency response. This study selects “6.24” Xinmo landslide as the object of research, using literature analysis, interviews, relationship mining and other research methods to build a network of collaborators between subjects in the process of disaster response, and compares the randomly generated cooperative network with similar attributes and cases abroad, focusing on the network resilience of the collaborator relationship from the perspective of social network. The study finds that key actors in the emergency response network fulfill the role of responsibility required for disaster response, and in terms of the efficiency of emergency rescue, China’s emergency rescue system has institutional superiority. The position of key actors such as headquarters in the network affects the efficiency and resilience of the entire cooperative network. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the level of coordinated disaster relief among the overall network members in the emergency rescue after the disaster, so as to achieve practical results in rescue efficiency and effectiveness.

Key words: sudden disaster, emergency response, social network, collaborator relationship, network resilience

中图分类号:

C931

汤敏, 刘斌, 李仕明, 李璞. 基于社会网络视角的突发灾害应急响应合作者关系网络分析——以“6·24”叠溪滑坡灾害为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 103-108.

TANG Min, LIU Bin, LI Shi-ming, LI Pu. Network Analysis of Sudden Disaster Emergency Response Partner Relationship Based on Social Network Perspective ——Taking the “6·24” Diexi landslide as an Example[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(4): 103-108.

参考文献

[1] 许强,李为乐,董秀军,肖先煊,范宣梅,裴向军.四川茂县叠溪镇新磨村滑坡特征与成因机制初步研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(11):2612-2628.
[2] 刘军.社会网络模型研究论析[J].社会学研究,2004,19(1):1-12.
[3] 李刚,曹洪刚,陈凯,张雪.基于社会网络分析的评价模型研究[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(6):147-152.
[4] 魏顺平.社会网络分析及其应用案例[J].现代教育技术,2010,20(3):29-34.
[5] 苏陈朋,韩传峰.非常规突发事件跨组织合作网络结构演化机理研究——以2008年桂林冰雪灾害为例[J].软科学,2014,28(8):107-111,116.
[6] Hossain L,Guan D C K.Modeling coordination in hospital emergency departments through social network analysis[J].Disasters,2012,36(2): 338-364.
[7] 潘新,邓贵仕,佟斌.基于社会网络的舆情传播模型构建与分析[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(2):176-179,185.
[8] Kapucu N.Interagency communication networks during emergencies: boundary spanners in multiagency coordination[J].American Review of Public Administration,2006,36(2): 207-225.
[9] Kapucu N,Garayev V,Wang X H.Sustaining networks in emergency management[J].Public Performance &Management Review,2013,37(1): 104-133.
[10] Wang D,Qi C,Wang H W.Improving emergency response collaboration and resource allocation by task network mapping and analysis[J].Safety Science,2014,70: 9-18.
[11] Mohammadfam I,Bastani S,Golmohamadi R,Seai A,Es-haghi M.Applying social network analysis to evaluate preparedness through coordination and trust in emergency management[J].Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions,2015,14(4): 329-340.
[12] Chatfield A T,Reddick C G,Brajawidagda U.Government surveillance disclosures,bilateral trust and indonesia-australia cross-border security cooperation: social network analysis of twitter data[J].Government Information Quarterly,2015,32(2): 118-128.
[13] Robinson S E,Eller W S,Gall M,Gerber B J.The core and periphery of emergency management networks[J].Public Management Review,2013,15(3): 344-362.
[14] Abbasi A,Kapucu N.Structural dynamics of organizations during the evolution of interorganizational networks in disaster response[J].Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management,2012,9(1): 547-573.
[15] Stojmenovic M,Lindgaard G.Social network analysis and communication in emergency response simulations[J].Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce,2014,24(2-3): 236-256.
[16] 刘德海,王维国.维权型群体性突发事件社会网络结构与策略的协同演化机制[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(3):185-192.
[17] 刘亮,陈以增,韩传峰,荣玫.国家应急管理工作组合作网络的社会网络分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2015,25(3):152-158.
[18] 马奔,李文静.天津港“8·12”事故应急合作网络与协同应对[J].国家行政学院学报,2017(4):91-96,147.
[19] Najjar W,Gaudiot J L.Network resilience: a measure of network fault tolerance[J].IEEE Transactions on Computers,1990,39(2): 174-181.
[20] Cozzens M,Moazzami D,Stueckle S.The tenacity of a graph[C]//Seventh international conference on the theory and applications of Graphs.New York,USA: Wiley,1995: 1111-1122.
[21] 王玥,蔡皖东,段琪.基于遗传算法的网络脆弱性计算方法[J].系统仿真学报,2009,21(6):1628-1632.
[22] Liu X F,Xu X K,Small M,Tse C K.Attack resilience of the evolving scientific collaboration network[J].Plos One,2011,6(10):e26271.
[23] Gao J X,Barzel B,Barabási A L.Universal resilience patterns in complex networks[J].Nature,2016,530(7590): 307-312.
[24] Brede M,Vries B J M D.Networks that optimize a trade-off between efficiency and dynamical resilience[J].Physics Letters A,2009,373(43): 3910-3914.
[25] Jung K,Song M.Linking emergency management networks to disaster resilience: bonding and bridging strategy in hierarchical or horizontal collaboration networks[J].Quality &Quantity,2015,49(4):1465-1483.
[26] Doerfel M L,Chewning L V,Lai C H.The evolution of networks and the resilience of interorganizational relationships after disaster[J].Communication Monographs,2013,80(4): 533-559.
[27] Newman M E J.The structure and function of complex networks[J].Siam Review,2003,45(2): 167-256.
[28] 刘军.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
[29] 岳洪江,刘思峰.管理科学期刊同被引网络结构分析[J].情报学报,2008,27(3):400-406.
[30] Steelman T A,Nowell B,Bayoumi D,McCaffrey S.Methodological insights from infocentric analysis understanding information exchange during disaster response[J].Administration &Society,2014,46(6): 707-743.
[31] 刘传正,陈红旗,韩冰,陈辉.重大地质灾害应急响应技术支撑体系研究[J].地质通报,2010,29(1):147-156.
[32] 张海波,尹铭磊.应急响应中的突生组织网络——“鲁甸地震”案例研究[J].公共管理学报,2016,13(2):84-96,156-157.

基于社会网络视角的突发灾害应急响应合作者关系网络分析——以“6·24”叠溪滑坡灾害为例

Network Analysis of Sudden Disaster Emergency Response Partner Relationship Based on Social Network Perspective ——Taking the “6·24” Diexi landslide as an Example

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	翁克瑞, 刘卫. 确定阀值下社会影响力最大化模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 169-174.
[2]	徐选华, 刘尚龙. 社会网络环境下基于“信任—知识”模型的风险性大群体应急决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 31-38.
[3]	闫鑫, 祝福云. 中国轻工业全要素生产率的空间溢出效应研究——基于空间计量与社会网络分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 107-113.
[4]	徐选华, 张前辉. 社会网络环境下保护少数意见的风险性大群体应急决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 49-58.
[5]	金辉, 贾昱, 钱志发. 基于社会网络分析的虚拟社区知识共享研究进展可视化分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(4): 149-157.
[6]	汪婧, 荣莉莉. 一种面向多预案整合的层次网络模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(1): 203-214.
[7]	张尧, 冯玉强. 数据稀疏环境下基于用户主题偏好的协同过滤算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(2): 145-152.
[8]	李刚, 曹洪刚, 陈凯, 张雪. 基于社会网络分析的评价模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(6): 147-152.
[9]	潘新, 邓贵仕, 佟斌. 基于社会网络的舆情传播模型构建与分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(2): 176-179.