Research on the Relationship between the Strength of Cluster Enterprise Tie on Coordinative Technological Innovation ——Based on Enterprises Types and Innovation Types

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0038

Abstract

Abstract: Wnether a strong tie or weak tie is more conductive to the enterprises’ coordinative innovation has been debated. Based on past research, cluster enterprise is divided into core firm and supporting enterprise, and technological innovation is divided into exploration innovation and exploitation innovation. This paper argues that both a strong tie and weak tie can coexist, and that the weak tie often exists between core enterprises, and meanwhile, the strong tie exists between core enterprises and matching enterprises. That the weak tie is beneficial for exploration innovation and the strong tie is beneficial for exploitation innovation is confirmed by the game model. Studies also discover that the exploration innovation and exploitation innovation are mutual improvement and mutual supplementary.

Key words: technological innovation management, industrial cluster, network tie, core firm

摘要： 集群企业之间的关系强度对合作技术创新具有何种影响,一直存在争论。为了进一步分析该问题,文章借鉴相关研究成果,将集群企业分为核心企业和配套企业,将技术创新分为探索式创新和利用式创新,在此基础上建立了合作创新的博弈论模型。文章研究得出:核心企业之间的弱关系有利于探索式创新,核心企业与配套企业之间的强关系有利于利用式创新;探索式创新和利用式创新是相互促进、相互补充的。

关键词: 技术创新管理, 产业集群, 网络关系, 核心企业

CLC Number:

YANG Jiao-ping, ZHANG Heng-jun, HOU Nan. Research on the Relationship between the Strength of Cluster Enterprise Tie on Coordinative Technological Innovation ——Based on Enterprises Types and Innovation Types[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(1): 280-287.

杨皎平, 张恒俊, 侯楠. 集群企业间关系强度对合作技术创新的影响——基于企业类型和创新类型的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(1): 280-287.

References

[1] Patrucco P. Institutional variety, networking and konwledge exchange communication and innovation in the case of the Brianza technological district[J]. Regional Studies, 2003, 37(2): 159-172.
[2] Mariano N, Pilar Q. Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity. knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort[J]. Journal of Technovation, 2005, 25(10): 1141-1157.
[3] 买忆媛,聂鸣.产业集群对企业创新活动的影响[J].研究与发展管理,2003,15(2):7-9.
[4] 杨皎平,徐维隆,赵宏霞.产业集群下经理人隐性激励机制作用效果分析[J].管理评论,2010,22(5):63-68.
[5] 吴晓波,耿帅.区域集群自稔性风险成因分析[J].经济地理,2003,23(6): 726-730.
[6] 王婉珍.网络嵌入性与产业集群竞争力[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2008(6):69-73.
[7] 吴晓波,耿帅,徐松屹.基于共享性资源的集群企业竞争优势分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(4):1-6.
[8] 蔡铂,聂鸣.社会网络对产业集群技术创新的影响[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003,(7):57-59.
[9] Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: the effeminacy of multiple contacts[J]. Organization Studies, 2002, 23(4): 525-548.
[10] Yli-Renko H,Autio E,Tontti V. Social capital, konwledge and the international growth of technology based new firms[J]. International business review, 2002, 11(3): 279-304.
[11] 吴晓波,韦影.制药企业技术创新战略网络中的关系性嵌入[J].科学学研究,2005,23(4):561-565.
[12] Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in inter-firm network: the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1): 35-67.
[13] 蔡秀玲,林竞君.基于网络嵌入性的集群生命周期研究[J].经济地理,2005,25(2):281-284.
[14] 王婉珍.网络嵌入性与产业集群竞争力[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2008(6):69-73.
[15] 耿建泽.企业集群竞争优势与地域根植性的相关性研究[J].理论界,2008,(3):51-52.
[16] 李西垚,弋亚群,苏中锋.社会关系对企业家精神与创新关系的影响研究[J].研究与发展管理,2010,22(5):39-44.
[17] Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(1):82-111.
[18] 杨皎平,刘馨阳,任海芝.集群嵌入性对企业技术创新的双向影响——基于沟通交流和关系锁定的视角[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(11):90-95.
[19] 蔡宁,潘松挺.网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协同演化—以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J].中国工业经济,2008,(4):137-144.
[20] 杨皎平,金彦龙,戴万亮.网络嵌入、学习空间与集群创新绩效:基于知识管理的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(6):51-59.
[21] Lorenzoni G, Ornati O. Constellations of firms and new ventures[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1988, 3(1): 41-57.
[22] Cohen W, Levithal D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
[23] 刘宇,李金玉.战略网络中的核心企业研究评述[J].导弹与航天运载技术,2011,(6):23-27.
[24] 宣烨,孔群喜,李思慧.加工配套企业升级模式及行动特征[J].管理世界,2011,(8):102-113.
[25] 项后军.核心企业视角的集群竞一合关系重新研究[J].中国工业经济,2010,(6):137-146.
[26] 曹丽莉.产业集群网络结构的比较研究[J].中国工业经济,2008,(8):143-152.
[27] Benner M, Tushman M. Process management and technological innovation: a longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries[J]. Administrative science quarterly,2002, 47(11): 676-706.
[28] He Z, Wang P, Exploration V S. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization science, 2004, 15(4): 481-494.
[29] Benner M. Tushman M. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of management review, 2003, 28(2): 238-256.
[30] Zollo M, Witnter S. Deliberate learning and evolution of dynamic capabilities[J]. Organization science, 2002, 13(3): 339-351.
[31] d’Asprement C, Jacquemin A. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5): 1133-1137.
[32] 吴先华,郭际,胡汉辉.技术联盟企业的认知距离、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,(3):53-58.
[33] 陈旭,李仕明.产业集群内双寡头企业合作创新博弈分析[J].管理学报,2007,4(1):94-99.
[34] 霍沛军,陈剑,陈继祥.双寡头R&D合作与非合作时的最优溢出[J].中国管理科学,2002,(16):92-96.