区间直觉模糊信息下的监理工程师信用评价

doi:10.12005/orms.2018.0019

运筹与管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 125-131.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2018.0019

区间直觉模糊信息下的监理工程师信用评价

赵丽丽^1,2, 王雪青¹, 陈超³

1.天津大学管理与经济学部,天津 300072;
2.河北经贸大学管理科学与工程学院,河北石家庄 050061;
3.天津地铁资源投资有限公司发展策划部,天津 300102

收稿日期:2014-01-27 出版日期:2018-01-25
作者简介:赵丽丽(1985-),女,讲师,研究方向为工程项目决策与控制、信用治理;王雪青(1965-),女,博士生导师,教授,主要研究方向为工程项目管理、建筑市场信用;陈超(1984-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为预测与决策。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172148);国家火炬计划重大项目(2015GH720202);河北省社会科学基金项目(HB17GL052)

Credit Evaluation of Supervision Engineers with Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information

ZHAO Li-li^1,2, WANG Xue-qing¹, CHEN Chao³

1.College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2.Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China;
3.Ministry of Development Plan, Tianjin Metro Resource TPG Capital, Tianjin 300102, China

Received:2014-01-27 Online:2018-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于外界环境的复杂多变和决策者的主观偏好,若运用传统信用评价方法单从业主或承包商的视角对监理工程师进行信用评价,会导致评价结果出现偏差。针对此本文从利益相关者的层面,运用区间直觉模糊集构建模糊综合评价模型,对监理工程师的信用行为进行评价,此模型通过相似性度量值、精确度函数分别得到利益相关者的权重和信用评价指标的权重,并在此基础上运用IIFHG等算子对区间直觉模糊信息进行集结,可以充分考虑不同利益相关者在评价过程中的话语权,有效规避评价主体因主观偏好所引起的偏差。最后通过算例分析表明该方法的有效性和合理性。

关键词: 区间直觉模糊集, 相似性度量值, 信用评价, 利益相关者

Abstract: Traditional credit evaluation methods only evaluate from the perspective of the owner or contractor. Because the supervision engineers’ information is uncertain and evaluation subjects are inherently subjective, evaluation information can’t be accurately expressed with precise real number. Therefore, from the stakeholders’ perspective, interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets are used to evaluate the credit of supervision engineers comprehensively. The method obtains the weights of stakeholders with similarity measure, which establishes a linear programming model based on accuracy function to determine the weights of evaluation index. Then we use IIFHG and IIFWG operator to fuse the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. The method can fully reflect the differences of different credit indicators, avert the declination caused by the the subjectivity of the subject. Finally, a numerical example shows the effectiveness and rationality.

Key words: interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, similarity measure, credit evaluation, stakeholder

中图分类号:

TU72

赵丽丽, 王雪青, 陈超. 区间直觉模糊信息下的监理工程师信用评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 125-131.

ZHAO Li-li, WANG Xue-qing, CHEN Chao. Credit Evaluation of Supervision Engineers with Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(1): 125-131.

参考文献

[1] Gefen D. E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust[J]. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 2000, 28(6): 725-737.
[2] Barth J R, Brumbaugh R D, Sauerhaft D. Thrift institution failures: estimating the regulator’s closure rule[J]. Research in Financial Services, 1989, (1): 222-228.
[3] Odeh O O, Featherstone A M, Das S. Predicting credit default: Comparative results from an artificial neural network, logistic regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system[J]. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 2010, (42): 7-18.
[4] Zhou L G, Kin K K, Yen J. Credit scoring models with AUC maximization based on weighted SVM[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2009, 8(4): 677-696.
[5] 高尚,刘夫成.与k均值混合的支持向量机的个人信用评估[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(2):169-173.
[6] Hájek P. Municipal credit rating modelling by neural networks[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51(1): 108-118.
[7] 杜婷.基于粗糙集支持向量机的个人信用评估模型[J].统计与决策,2012,(1):94-96.
[8] 范志清,王雪青,李宝龙.基于物元分析的建筑市场执业资格人员信用评价研究[J].软科学,2009,23(7):41-45.
[9] 张洪祥,毛志忠.基于多维时间序列的灰色模糊信用评价研究[J].管理科学学报,2011,14(1):28-37.
[10] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
[11] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.
[12] Atanassov K T, Gargov G. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, 31(3): 343-349.
[13] 梁昌勇,戚筱雯,丁勇,张俊岭.一种直觉模糊多属性群决策方法及其在群决策中的应用[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(1):41-47.
[14] 赵萌,任嵘嵘,李刚.区间直觉模糊集的模糊熵群决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(5):117-121.
[15] Wan S P, Li D F. Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees[J]. Omega-The International Journal of Management Science, 2013, 41(6): 925-940.
[16] Wan S P, Li D F. Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making with atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees[J]. IEEE Transactions of Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 22(2): 300-312.
[17] Wan S P, Dong J Y. A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2014, 80(1): 237-256.
[18] Zhou L G, Tao Z F, Chen H Y. Continuous interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38(7): 2190-2205.
[19] Jin F F, Pei L D, Chen H Y. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy continuous weighted entropy and its application to multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 59: 132-141.
[20] Xu Z S. Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making[J]. Control and Decision, 2007, 22(2): 215-219.
[21] Bustince H, Burillo P. Correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1995, 74(2): 237-244.
[22] Xu Z S. A deviation-based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2010, 19(1): 57-76.
[23] Xu Z S, Chen J. An overview of distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2008, 16(4): 529-555.
[24] 苑宏宪,王雪青.基于治理理论的注册建造师执业信用评价及模型研究[J].管理现代化,2013,(3):77-79.
[25] 周国强.职业信用研究[D].天津:天津大学,2013.49-55.
[26] Pawlak Z. Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Computer Information Science, 1982, 11(5): 341-356.
[27] 赵丽丽.基于激励理论的监理工程师信用治理研究[D].天津:天津大学,2015.28-29.
[28] Wei G W, Wang X R. Some geometric aggregation operators on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to group decision making[C]. China: Computational Intelligence and Security, 2007. 495-499.
[29] 张英俊,马培军,苏小红.属性权重不确定条件下的区间直觉模糊多属性决策[J].自动化学报,2012,38(2):220-228.
[30] Xu Z S. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2005, 20(8): 843-865.

区间直觉模糊信息下的监理工程师信用评价

Credit Evaluation of Supervision Engineers with Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李婉红, 李娜, 刘芳. 绿色技术创新利益相关者的三群体演化博弈及其仿真[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 216-224.
[2]	刘惠敏, 檀灵慧, 胡梦月, 秦俊杰, 褚海涛. 既有建筑合同能源管理中的政府角色——基于模糊Shapley值的研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 213-221.
[3]	曾守桢, 骆丹丹. 基于投影模型的区间直觉模糊多属性决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 10-15.
[4]	谢宏伟, 魏伟, 郭崇慧, 陈海民, 李文杰, 陈冲. 基于连续用电量和缴费时间差的客户信用动态评价模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 141-147.
[5]	张发明, 王伟明, 李小霜. TOPSIS-GRA法下的企业动态信用评价方法及其应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(9): 132-138.
[6]	康伟, 杜蕾. 邻避冲突中的利益相关者演化博弈分析——以污染类邻避设施为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(3): 82-92.
[7]	赵萌, 秦松松, 谢佳恒, 张奉冰, 李刚. 考虑决策者风险偏好的区间直觉模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 7-16.
[8]	蒋翠清, 梁坤, 丁勇, 段锐. 基于改进Adaboost的信用评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(2): 135-139.
[9]	吴冲, 万翔宇. 基于改进熵权法的区间直觉模糊TOPSIS方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(5): 42-47.
[10]	赵萌, 任嵘嵘, 李刚. 区间直觉模糊集的模糊熵群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(5): 117-121.