销售努力及双市场化期权下的三级供应链协调

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0141

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 33-40.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0141

销售努力及双市场化期权下的三级供应链协调

蔡鑫^1,2, 孙静春³

1.深圳大学理论经济学博士后流动站,广东深圳 518060;
2.深圳大学经济学院,广东深圳 518060;
3.西安交通大学管理学院,陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2017-11-23 出版日期:2020-06-25
作者简介:蔡鑫(1990-),男,江西南昌人,博士,研究方向:供应链风险管理;孙静春(1966-),男,陕西西安人,教授,博士,研究方向:新能源供应链管理。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BJY140)

Three-Level Supply Chain Coordination Under Double Market-Oriented Options with Sales Effort

CAI Xin^1,2, SUN jing-chun³

1. Postdoctoral Research Station of Theoretical Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China;
2. College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China;
3. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2017-11-23 Online:2020-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文针对需求随机且受到零售商销售努力影响的情况,研究了由制造商、分销商和零售商组成的三级供应链的协调问题。文章首先用双期权契约对三级供应链进行协调,即在制造商和分销商以及分销商和零售商之间都采用期权契约,发现在零售商独自承担努力成本的情况下仅通过双期权契约无法协调供应链。因此在双期权契约的基础上加入了努力成本共担契约,发现当期权价格满足某种线性关系以及零售商努力成本按特定比例分摊时,联合双期权契约和努力成本共担契约能顺利协调供应链。在此基础上,文章还引入了期权的市场化定价规则,研究了期权采用市场化定价规则对供应链协调产生的影响,研究表明,引入期权市场化定价规则增加了供应链协调需要满足的条件,降低了协调的可能性,且协调状态下的期权价格受到市场因素如利率、价格波动率等的影响。最后,文章给出了期权市场化定价规则下供应链协调的条件以及参数变化对协调的影响。

关键词: 三级供应链, 期权契约, 努力成本共担, 市场化定价

Abstract: Aiming at the situation where the demand is random and is affected by retailers' sales efforts,this paper studies a coordination problem of a supply chain with a manufacturer, a distributer and a retailer. First,we try to coordinate the three level supply chain only with double option contracts, that is, option contract is used between the manufacturer and distributor as well as the distributor and retailer, but find it cannot realize coordination when the effort cost is undertaken only by the retailer. So, besides the option contract, the paper introduces effort cost partaking contract,then we find when the parameters of option contracts can meet some linear relationships and the effort cost is apportioned among supply chain members,the two contracts above can realize the coordination of the supply chain. In addition, we introduce the market-oriented pricing rules of options, and study the effect of market-oriented options on supply chain coordination. The paper shows that the introduction of market-oriented option pricing rules increases the conditions for supply chain coordination and reduces the possibility of supply chain coordination, and the option price is affected by the market factors, such as price fluctuation and interest rate. Lastly, the coordination conditions under Market-Oriented Options with sales effort effects are given and the effect of the change of parameters on supply chain coordination isalso analyzed.

Key words: three level supply chain, option contract, effort cost partaking, market-oriented pricing

中图分类号:

蔡鑫, 孙静春. 销售努力及双市场化期权下的三级供应链协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 33-40.

CAI Xin, SUN jing-chun. Three-Level Supply Chain Coordination Under Double Market-Oriented Options with Sales Effort[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(6): 33-40.

参考文献

[1] Barnes-Schuster D, Bassork Y, Anupindi R. Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options[J]. Manufacture & Services Operation Management, 2002, 4(3): 171-207.
[2] 吴英晶,李勇建,张李浩.基于期权契约零售商融资最优策略研究[J].管理评论,2014,26:197-208.
[3] Spinler S, Huchzermeier A, 2006. The valuation of options on capacity with cost and demand uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(3): 915-934.
[4] Zhao Y, Wang S Y, Cheng T C E, et al. Coordination of supply chains by option contracts: a cooperative game theory approach[J]. European Journal of operational Research, 2010, 207: 668-675.
[5] Chen X, Hao G, Li. Channel coordination with a loss-averse retailer and option contracts[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 150: 52-57.
[6] 许明辉,胡兵.考虑零售商公平关切的期权合约研究[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(6):112-119.
[7] Wang X L, Liu L W.Coordination in a retailer-led supply chain through option contract[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, 110: 115-127.
[8] Cai J H, Hu X Q, Yi Y, et al. Supply chain coordination with an option contract under vendor-managed inventory[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2016, 23: 1163-1183.
[9] 刘玲,张廷龙,汪燚.零售商主导下双向期权的供应链契约研究[J].重庆交通大学学报,2016,16(1):43-48.
[10] 蔡洪文,张旭辉.零售商主导下供应链成员单方面创新期权契约研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20:608-614.
[11] 赵金实,霍佳震,赵莹.逆向主导型供应链期权定价优化的绩效影响因素分析[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(1):128-132.
[12] 何勇,吴清烈,赵林度.考虑努力及价格因素的弹性数量契约模型[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2007, 29(12): 2056-2059.
[13] 胡本勇,王性玉.考虑销售努力影响的供应链收益共享演化契约[J].管理工程学报,2010,(2):33-38.
[14] Krishnan H, Kapuseinski R, Butz D. Coordinating contracts for decentralized supply chain with retailer promotional effort[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(l): 48-63.
[15] 徐最,朱道力,朱文贵.销售努力水平影响需求情况下的供应链回购契约[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,(4):1-11.
[16] Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts.In: Kok, de A.G., Graves, S.C.,(Eds).Handbooks in operations research and management science, 2003, Vol.11, Supply chain management: design, coordination and operation. Elsevier: Amsterdam: 229-339.
[17] Taylor T A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(8): 992-1007.
[18] Ma P, Wang H, Shang J. Supply chain channel strategies with quality and marketing effort-dependent demand[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(2): 572-581.
[19] 庞庆华,蒋晖,候岳明,骆杨.需求受销售努力影响的供应链收益共享契约模型[J].系统管理学报,2013,(6):24-30.
[20] 何勇,杨德礼,吴清烈.基于努力因素的供应链利益共享契约模型研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(11):1856-1868.
[21] Lariviere M A, Porteus E. Selling to the newsvendor: an analysis of price-only contracts[J]. Manufacturing Service Operation Management, 2001, 3(4): 293-305.
[22] Zhao Y, Ma L, Xie G, et al, 2013. Coordination of supply chains with bidirectional option contracts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2): 375-381.
[23] 朱珠,朱云龙,申海,邹文平.需求不确定下制造商为核心的三级供应链协调[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(1):88-95.
[24] 李仕群.期权定价的敏感性分析[J].沿海企业与科技,2009,104(1):119-123.
[25] 郑振龙,陈蓉.金融工程(第二版)[M].高等教育出版社,2008.200-300.

销售努力及双市场化期权下的三级供应链协调

Three-Level Supply Chain Coordination Under Double Market-Oriented Options with Sales Effort

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘阳, 田军, 周琨. 基于期权契约的应急药品储备模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 67-74.
[2]	扈衷权, 田军, 沈奥, 冯耕中. 基于利润—CVaR的期权契约供应链协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 13-22.
[3]	扈衷权, 田军, 冯耕中. 看涨期权契约与看跌期权契约对比分析研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 221-229.
[4]	扈衷权,田军,冯耕中. 基于供应方生产能力的应急物资生产模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 100-108.
[5]	徐春秋. 基于减排成本共担期权契约的供应链协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(7): 20-27.
[6]	林强, 徐晴. 预付款融资下期权契约的协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 172-183.
[7]	蹇明, 王永龙. 产出不确定性的三级供应链风险分担组合契约设计[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7): 74-81.
[8]	浦徐进, 金德龙. 多重参照点、公平偏好和三级供应链协调机制设计[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(6): 89-94.
[9]	蔡鑫, 孙静春. 基于CVaR测度和期权市场化定价的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(6): 1-10.
[10]	王志宏,邵奇明,王晓锋. 考虑即时采购价格的物流服务供应链优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(2): 36-39.