老龄科学家群体特性对需求层次实现影响的实证研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0276

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 233-239.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0276

• 管理科学 • 上一篇

老龄科学家群体特性对需求层次实现影响的实证研究

陈泽艺, 张志辉

中国科学技术大学科技史与科技考古系,安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2018-04-13 出版日期:2020-10-25
通讯作者: 陈泽艺,女,硕士研究生,研究方向为近现代科技史与科技政策。
作者简介:张志辉(1970-),男,安徽合肥人,教授,博士,中国科学技术史学会第九届常务理事。

Research on the Influence of Group Characteristics of Aging Scientists on Hierarchy of Needs

CHEN Ze-yi, ZHANG Zhi-hui

Department History of Science and Scientific Archaeology University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2018-04-13 Online:2020-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国人口老龄化问题研究现已成为学术界的研究热点领域。研究不同人群的老龄化特点,对于制定有效的管理政策具有重要意义。老龄科学家是一个特殊群体,分析他们的群体特征和实际需求状况,是研究制订针对该群体政策的前提。本研究基于格栅/群体的理论与马斯洛需求层次理论相结合的理论模型,以中国高校退休科学家群体为案例,用假设检验的方式处理问卷调查的数据,以探讨老科学家群体特性对其需求层次实现的内在影响机制,为制订或完善退休科学家的相关政策提供理论支持。

关键词: 老龄科学家, 格栅/群体模型, 需求层次理论, 科技人才政策

Abstract: The problem of aging population in China is one of important research fields in academia. Studying the aging characteristics of different groups can make the management policy more effective. Aging scientists can be a special group,and the analysis of the actual demand situation of the aging scientists group in reality can be the basis of the policy formulation for this group. This study is based on the theoretical model, which is constructed by gird-group theory and Maslow’s theory of demand hierarchy. Taking a retired scientist group in a university as a case, we explore the internal influence mechanism of group characteristics and needs through questionnaires. The result could provide the theoretical support for the relevant policies of the retired scientists group.

Key words: aging scientists, gird-group theory, needs-hierarchy theory, scientific personnel policy

中图分类号:

陈泽艺, 张志辉. 老龄科学家群体特性对需求层次实现影响的实证研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 233-239.

CHEN Ze-yi, ZHANG Zhi-hui. Research on the Influence of Group Characteristics of Aging Scientists on Hierarchy of Needs[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(10): 233-239.

参考文献

[1] Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychological review, 1977, 84(2): 191-215.
[2] Cumming E, Henry W E. Growing old, the process of disengagement[M]. Basic Books, 1961.
[3] Havighurst R J. A social-psychological perspective on aging[J]. Gerontologist, 1968, 8(2): 67-71.
[4] Caldock K, Nolan M. Assessment and community care: are the reforms working[J]. Generations Review, 1994, 4(4): 2-4.
[5] Parry-Jones B, Soulsby J. Needs-led assessment: the challenges and the reality[J]. Health & social care in the community, 2001, 9(6): 414-428.
[6] 黃盈樺,李佩真.初探高齡者的在地老化與服務需求[J].物業管理學報,2013,4(1):11-19.
[7] 田元采.哈尔滨市高校社区养老需求与养老模式研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2015.
[8] 穆瑞章.老年群体隐性需求研究[D].天津财经大学,2010.
[9] Richard L, Gauvin L, Gosselin C, et al. Staying connected: neighbourhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in montreal, quebec[J]. Health Promotion International, 2009, 24(1): 46-57.
[10] Douglas M. Natural symbols: explorations in cosmology[M]. Routledge, 2004.
[11] Douglas M. Cultural bias[M]. Royal Anthropological Institute, 1978.
[12] 刘兵.格/群分析理论与科学史研究[J].自然辩证法研究,1992,8(7):36-42.
[13] Maslow A H. A theory of human motivation[J]. Psychological review, 1943, 50(4): 370-396.
[14] Wang M. Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees’ psychological well-being[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(2): 455-474.
[15] Gross J L, Rayner S. Measuring culture: a paradigm for the analysis of social organization[M]. Columbia Univ Press, 1985.
[16] Maslow A H, Elisa Hirsh, Marcella Stein, et al. A clinically derived test for measuring psychological security-insecurity[J]. Journal of General Psychology, 1945, 33(1): 21-41.
[17] Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press, 1965.
[18] Campbell A. Subjective measures of well-being[J]. American psychologist, 1976, 31(2): 117-124.
[19] Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency[J]. American psychologist, 1982, 37(2): 122-147.
[20] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.

老龄科学家群体特性对需求层次实现影响的实证研究

Research on the Influence of Group Characteristics of Aging Scientists on Hierarchy of Needs

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	丁秋雷, 胡祥培, 位娟, 姜洋. 动态需求下蓄冷式多温共配多目标优化模型及算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 13-19.
[2]	王艳婷, 何正文, 和媛媛. 随机环境下基于成本经济的项目调度权衡优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 20-27.
[3]	董纪阳, 何万里. 集中通勤接送服务的最小化成本模型及算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 28-34.
[4]	李进军, 李婷婷, 包玉娥, 陈明浩. 区间毕达哥拉斯模糊幂几何-几何Heronian平均算子及其在多属性群决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 78-83.
[5]	樊自甫, 程姣姣. 基于微分博弈的数据开放策略及合作收益分配机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 100-107.
[6]	陈恒, 杨志, 祁凯. 多方博弈情景下政产学研绿色技术创新联盟稳定性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 108-114.
[7]	王泽鹏. 基于动态遗传算法的共享配送模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 115-122.
[8]	曾小春, 李随成, 高琨. 基于突变级数的我国区域技术有效供给发展状况动态评价——模糊奖惩特征的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 158-164.
[9]	崔春生, 曹艳丽, 邱闯闯, 郭玉洁, 王美琦, 臧振春. 基于证据理论和Vague集的多属性群决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 1-5.
[10]	商波, 黄涛珍. 可再生能源配额制下异质权力发电商的绿色生产决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 6-13.
[11]	宋云婷, 于安琪, 吴迪, 赵伟杰,田玺环. 出口海陆仓融资决策多目标优化模型与算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 14-18.
[12]	刘长石, 王松, 罗亮, 邓胜前. 时变路网条件下联合配送的开放式车辆路径问题[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 26-33.
[13]	陶希闻, 江文奇. 面向直觉模糊集排序能力提升的记分函数设计研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 34-39.
[14]	张新卫, 冯琼, 李靖, 同淑荣. 基于2可加模糊测度的多线性效用函数建模和求解[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 113-119.
[15]	侯芳. 基于随机优胜连接行为的犹豫模糊群组评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 183-189.