煤炭资源型地区技术锁定效应测度研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0325

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文利用煤炭产业区位熵指数,对煤炭资源型地区进行划分。运用DEA-SBM模型,选取2008年到2016年我国30个省份的投入产出数据,划分为煤炭资源型地区和非煤炭资源型地区,通过测算其技术创新效率,对煤炭资源型地区的技术锁定效应进行研究。选取煤炭资源型地区2008年到2016年的面板数据,构建回归模型,对其技术锁定的主要影响因素进行研究。结果显示:山西、内蒙古、贵州、陕西、甘肃、宁夏的煤炭产业区位熵指数均大于临界值,为煤炭资源型地区。与非煤炭资源型地区相比,它们的技术创新效率更低,技术锁定效应更为明显。资源产业对资金的粘滞所造成的转换成本加剧了技术锁定效应,国有化程度较深的不合理的经济结构深化了技术锁定效应,同时政府的资金扶持、市场需求的扩大均能有效的降低技术锁定程度,并据此提出破解煤炭资源型地区技术锁定效应的对策建议。

关键词: 煤炭资源型地区, 技术锁定, 区位熵指数, DEA模型

Abstract: In this paper the location entropy index of coal industry is used to divide coal resource-based areas. Using DEA-SBM model, this paper selects input-output data of 30 provinces in China from 2008 to 2016 and divides them into coal resource-based areas and non-coal resource-based areas, and by measuring their efficiency of technological innovation, the technological lock-in effect of coal resource-based areas is studied .Based on the panel data from 2008 to 2016 in coal resource-based areas a regression model is constructed to study the main influencing factors of technology lock-in. The results show that the location entropy index of coal industry in Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Guizhou, Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia is higher than the critical value, so they are coal resource-based areas.Compared with non-coal resource-based areas, their technological innovation efficiency is low and the technology lock-in effect is obvious.The cost of conversion caused by the stickiness of resource industry to capital has exacerbated the technology lock-in effect, and the irrational economic structure with deeper nationalization deepened the technology lock-in effect.At the same time, the government’s financial support and the expansion of market demand can effectively reduce the technology lock-in effect,and on the basis of this it puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to solve the technology lock-in effect in coal resource-based areas.

Key words: coal resource-based areas, technology lock-in, location entropy index, DEA model

中图分类号:

F062.4

李刚, 马羽洁, 牛冲槐. 煤炭资源型地区技术锁定效应测度研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 147-153.

LI Gang, MA Yu-jie, NIU Chong-huai. Study on Technology Lock-in Effect in Coal Resource-based Areas[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(12): 147-153.

参考文献

[1] 张济建,苏慧.碳锁定驱动因素及其作用机制:基于改进PSR模型的研究[J].会计与经济研究,2016,30(1):120-128.
[2] Arthur W B. Competing technologies, inceasing returns, and lock-in by historical events[J]. Economic Journal, 1989, 99(394): 116-131.
[3] 易邱璐,赵莉.技术路径被动锁定与技术创新绩效——技术创新能力的中介作用[J].中国科技论坛,2017(11):38-46.
[4] 杨震宁,李东红,马振中.关系资本,锁定效应与中国制造业企业创新[J].科研管理,2013,34(11):44-54.
[5] 黎开颜,陈飞翔.深化开放中的锁定效应与技术依赖[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(11):56-70.
[6] 王子龙,许箫迪.技术创新路径锁定与解锁[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(04):60-66.
[7] 袭希,赵健宇.临界质量观点下创新系统技术锁定的仿真研究[J].软科学,2017,31(11):52-56.
[8] 杨园华,李力,牛国华等.我国企业低碳技术创新中的锁定效应及实证研究[J].科技管理研究, 2012,32(16):1-4.
[9] 张济建,翟珮伶,郭本海.基于转换成本的高碳产业技术锁定效应分析[J].科技管理究,2018,38(9):227-233.
[10] 李宏伟.“碳解锁”缝隙创新研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(12):55-61.
[11] Schot J, Geels F W. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2008, 20(5): 537-554.
[12] 武戈,郑哲贝,周五七.我国工业碳解锁动态演变进程及其影响因素研究[J].商业研究,2017,59(2):43-49.
[13] 徐盈之,郭进,刘仕萌.低碳经济背景下我国碳锁定与碳解锁路径研究[J].软科学,2015,29(10):33-38.
[14] 王士轩,孙慧,朱俏俏.基于区位熵和RIS模型的资源产业集群识别与检验——以新疆为例[J].生态经济,2016,32(1):115-118.
[15] 蔡飞,金洪.基于区位熵理论的中国资源型地区判定研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2010(2):142-144.
[16] 朱平芳,徐伟民.政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响——上海市的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003(6):45-53,94.
[17] 陈燕武.基于复合DEA和Malmquist指数的科技投入产出效率评价[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(6):196-204.
[18] 彭煜,陈思颖,盛文文,蒲玉.Malmquist指数法对西部地区技术创新效率的评价——基于两阶段关联DEA方法[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(3):162-168.
[19] 潘雄锋,杨越.剔除环境因素影响的中国工业企业技术创新效率评价研究[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(6):244-251.
[20] 陈恒,何平,林超然,冯志军.基于SBM-NDEA模型的我国高专利密集度产业技术创新效率研究[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(3):191-199.
[21] Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3): 498-509.
[22] 谢海生,庄贵阳.碳锁定效应的内涵、作用机制与解锁路径研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(1):38-42,57.
[23] 熊鸿军,戴昌钧.技术变迁中的路径依赖与锁定及其政策含义[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(11):94-97.
[24] Moeller K, Isbruch F. How to unlock lock-in effects through innovation-an empirical study on dependencies in the german automotive supplier industry[J]. Social Science Publishing, 2010, 10(3): 35-38.
[25] 赵莉,俞学燕,易邱璐.后发企业技术创新路径被动锁定成因与应对策略研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(11):68-72.
[26] 邱喆成.对外直接投资、创新能力提升与国有经济比重——基于我国省际面板数据的研究[J].上海经济研究,2015(9):24-30,128.
[27] 许爱萍.产业技术标准低端“锁定”及“解锁”路径研究[J].兰州财经大学学报,2016,32(1):100-105.
[28] Chen Y, Puttitanun T. Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2005, 78(2): 474-493.