语言分布评估信息下的群决策方法及其群体一致性分析

运筹与管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 120-127.

语言分布评估信息下的群决策方法及其群体一致性分析

冯建岗¹, 魏翠萍²

1.曲阜师范大学管理学院,山东日照 276826;
2.扬州大学数学科学学院,江苏扬州,225002

收稿日期:2013-04-20 出版日期:2021-05-25
作者简介:冯建岗(1988-),男,硕士研究生;魏翠萍(1970-),女,博士,教授,研究方向:决策理论与应用,信息融合。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71371107,71171187);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2013GM011);山东省研究生教育创新计划项目(SDYY12053)

Group Decision-making on Language Distribution Assessment Information and the Consistency Analysis of Decision-making Groups

FENG Jian-gang¹, WEI Cui-ping²

1. Management School, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China;
2. College of Mathematical Sciences, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China

Received:2013-04-20 Online:2021-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文提出了基于语言分布评估加权平均(DAWA)算子的多属性群决策方法;定义了个体决策者评价结果与决策群体评价结果的次序一致性和数值一致性测度,以此分析决策群体评价结果的可靠性;最后,通过具体实例验证了群决策方法的有效性和实用性,分析了个体决策者评价结果与决策群体评价结果的次序一致性和数值一致性。

关键词: 多属性群决策, 语言分布评估, 次序一致性, 数值一致性

Abstract: This paper proposes group decision-making method based on the language distribution assessment weighted average operator. It defines the ordered consistency and numerical consistency measure of the evaluation of results between individual decision maker and decision-making groups, for the analysis of the reliability of the evaluation results of decision-making groups. Finally,we prove the effectiveness and practicality of the method with concrete examples and analyzed the ordered consistency and numerical consistency of the evaluation of results between individual decision maker and decision-making groups.

Key words: MAGDM, language distribution assessment, the ordered consistency, the numerical consistency

中图分类号:

N945

冯建岗, 魏翠萍. 语言分布评估信息下的群决策方法及其群体一致性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(5): 120-127.

FENG Jian-gang, WEI Cui-ping. Group Decision-making on Language Distribution Assessment Information and the Consistency Analysis of Decision-making Groups[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(5): 120-127.

参考文献

[1] Herrera F, Martinez L. The 2-tuple linguistic computational model. Advantages of its linguistic description, accuracy and consistency[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems, 2001, 9: 33- 48.
[2] Wei G W. A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37: 7895-7900.
[3] Wu Z B, Chen Y H. The maximization deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2007, 158(14): 1608-1617.
[4] Boran F E, Genc S, Kurt M, Akay D. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 11363-11368.
[5] Xu Z S. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 166: 19-30.
[6] Xu Z S. EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2004, 12(6): 791- 810.
[7] Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L, Mata F, Chiclana F. A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations[J]. IEEE Transaction- on Fuzzy Systems, 2005, 13(5): 644-658.
[8] Wang X Y. Applying 2-tuple multi-granularity linguistic variables to determine the supply performance in dynamic environment based on product-oriented strategy[J]. IEEE Transactionon Fuzzy Systems, 2008, 16(1): 29-37.
[9] Xu Z S. A multi-attribute group decision making method based on term indices inlinguistic evaluation scales[J]. Journal of System Engineering, 2005, 20(1): 84- 88.
[10] Wang J H, Hao J Y. A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2006, 14(3): 435- 445.
[11] Wang J H, Hao J Y. An approach to computing with words based on canonical characteristic values of linguistic labels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2007, 15(4): 593- 604.
[12] Zhang G Q, Dong Y C, Xu Y F. Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments[J]. Information Fusion. 2012.
[13] Pang J F, Liang J Y. Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information[J]. Omega, 2012, 40: 294-301.

[1]	杜玉琴. Pythagorean模糊Hamacher算子及其应用分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 218-222.
[2]	关贤军, 周晗, 周礼刚, 陈华友. 一种基于Shapley值的Pythagorean模糊多属性群决策方法及其应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 81-86.
[3]	林文豪, 陈梅倩, 周礼刚, 林志超. 一种区间Pythagorean模糊VIKOR多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 57-64.
[4]	李进军, 李婷婷, 包玉娥, 陈明浩. 区间毕达哥拉斯模糊幂几何-几何Heronian平均算子及其在多属性群决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 78-83.
[5]	崔春生, 曹艳丽, 邱闯闯, 郭玉洁, 王美琦, 臧振春. 基于证据理论和Vague集的多属性群决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 1-5.
[6]	解江, 吴诗辉. 基于基本回路修正的AHP一致性调整方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 147-157.
[7]	吴伟, 顾丹. 基于偏序集的模糊互补矩阵次序一致性检验与调整[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 85-90.
[8]	张丽媛, 李涛. 三角模糊偏好下冲突型多属性群决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 45-51.
[9]	韩二东, 郭鹏, 赵静. 基于距离测度及支持度的混合评价信息供应商选择决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(9): 73-78.
[10]	谭春桥, 胡礼梅. 模糊环境下消费类电子产品推荐方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 126-137.
[11]	杜玉琴, 侯福均, 翟玉冰, 于倩. Pythagorean三角模糊语言Hamacher集结算子及其应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(3): 104-112.
[12]	李存斌, 张磊, 马原. 基于云模型和VIKOR扩展方法的电网企业科技发展区间值多属性群决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 63-69.
[13]	赵萌, 秦松松, 谢佳恒, 张奉冰, 李刚. 考虑决策者风险偏好的区间直觉模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 7-16.
[14]	代文锋, 仲秋雁, 贺冬冬. 基于证据推理的直觉模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(9): 1-6.
[15]	李少年, 吴良刚. 基于模糊证据推理及改进TOPSIS的多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(6): 16-23.