基于分布式序关系的双边匹配决策方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2016.0095

运筹与管理 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 146-150.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2016.0095

基于分布式序关系的双边匹配决策方法

陈圣群^1,2

1.福建江夏学院,福建福州 350108;
2.福州大学决策科学研究所,福建福州 350108

收稿日期:2015-05-09 出版日期:2016-06-25
作者简介:陈圣群(1977-),男,福建莆田人,副教授,博士,研究方向:决策与优化算法。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71371053,71403055);福建省自然科学基金项目(2015J01279);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JA14322);泉州市科技计划资助项目(2013Z17)

A Method for Two-sided Matching Decision-making with Distributed Order Relation Information

CHEN Sheng-qun^1,2

1.Fujianjiangxia University, Fuzhou 350108, China;
2.Decision Sciences Institute, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China

Received:2015-05-09 Online:2016-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对分布式序关系的双边匹配问题,提出了一种基于证据推理的决策方法。首先,以双边匹配满意程度为目标,把双边的各个评价信息作为证据,并通过证据融合求出匹配的满意度;接着,构建基于满意度的决策模型来获得匹配方案。最后, 通过算例说明该方法的应用。

关键词: 匹配决策, 分布式序关系, 证据推理

Abstract: A decision-making method based on evidential reasoning has been proposed for solving the two-sided matching problem with distributed order relation information in this paper. Firstly, two-sided satisfaction is taken as the goal, all pieces of the two-sided assessment information are taken as evidence and satisfaction degrees of two-sided matching are gotten by evidence fusion. Then, a decision-making model based on fusion degrees is constructed in order to obtain the matching solution. Finally, an illustrative example is given to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach.

Key words: matching decision-making, distributed order relation information, evidential reasoning

中图分类号:

C931

陈圣群. 基于分布式序关系的双边匹配决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 146-150.

CHEN Sheng-qun. A Method for Two-sided Matching Decision-making with Distributed Order Relation Information[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(3): 146-150.

参考文献

[1] Gale D, Shapley L. College admissions and the stability of marriage[J]. American Mathematical Monthly, 1962, 69(1): 9-15.
[2] Kojima F. School choice: Impossibilities for affirmative action[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2012, 75(2): 685-693.
[3] Ehlers L, Hafalir I E, Yenmez M B, et al. School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2014, 153: 648-683.
[4] Mindruta D, Moeen M, Agarwal R. A two-sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners’ attributes in inter-firm alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, forthcoming.
[5] Huang D K, Chiu H N. Yeh R H, Chang J H. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for solving a bi-objective personnel assignment problem[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(1): 1-10.
[6] Lin S Y, Horng S J, Kao T W, et al. Solving the bi-objective personnel assignment problem using particle swarm optimization[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12(9): 2840-2845.
[7] Klerkx L L. Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: experiences with innovation intermediaries[J]. Food Policy, 2008, 33(3): 260-276.
[8] Alam N, Lee Ng S. Banking mergers-an application of matching strategy[J]. Review of Accounting and Finance, 2014, 13(1): 2-23.
[9] Anjos F, Drexler A. Inter-company matching and the supply of informed capital[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015, 111: 119-136.
[10] Chen J, Song K. Two-sided matching in the loan market[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2013, 31(2): 145-152.
[11] Tervi M. The difference that CEOs make: an assignment model approach[J]. The American Economic Review, 2008: 642-668.
[12] Lippi F, Schivardi F. Corporate control and executive selection[J]. Quantitative economics, 2014, 5(2): 417-456.
[13] Poppo L, Zhou K Z. Managing contracts for fairness in buyer-upplier exchanges[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(10): 1508-1527.
[14] Zhou K Z, Zhang Q, Sheng S, et al. Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? buyer-supplier exchanges in China[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2014, 32(3): 88-98.
[15] Mindruta D. Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: a matching approach[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(6): 644-665.
[16] Iwama K, Miyazaki S, Yamauchi N. A approximation algorithm for the stable marriage problem[J]. Algorithmic, 2008, 51(3): 342-356.
[17] 乐琦.基于累积前景理论的具有不确定偏好序信息的双边匹配决策方法[J].系统科学与数学,2013,33(9):1061-1070.
[18] 梁海明,姜艳萍.一种基于弱偏好序信息的双边匹配决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2014,29(2):153-159.
[19] 张莉莉,胡祥培.基于人力资本竞优结构的“团队-作业对象”匹配决策模型[J].管理工程学报,2015,29(1):1-7.
[20] 乐琦.无差异区间型多指标匹配决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2014,29(1):41-47.
[21] 陈希,樊治平,李玉花.IT服务供需双边匹配的模糊多目标决策方法[J].管理学报,2011, 32(2):297-302.
[22] Huang D K, Chiu H N, Yeh R H, et al. A fuzzy multi-riteria decision making approach for solving a bi-objective personnel assignment problem[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(1): 1-10.
[23] 梁海明,姜艳萍.二手房组合交易匹配决策方法[J].系统工程理论实践,2015,35(2):358-367.
[24] 乐琦.基于不完全序关系信息的双边匹配决策方法[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2014,41(5):523-527.
[25] Vicki K. Marriage matching and gender satisfaction[J]. Social Choice Welfare, 2009, 32(1): 15-27.
[26] Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L. Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(3): 1885-1913.
[27] 陈圣群,王应明,施海柳.多属性匹配决策的等级置信度融合法[J].系统工程学报,2015,30(1):25-33.

基于分布式序关系的双边匹配决策方法

A Method for Two-sided Matching Decision-making with Distributed Order Relation Information

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	胡东滨, 谢玲. 基于云模型和证据推理的生态环境安全评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 130-136.
[2]	乐琦, 朱加贵. 基于三角直觉模糊数信息的双边匹配决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 57-62.
[3]	代文锋, 仲秋雁, 贺冬冬. 基于证据推理的直觉模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(9): 1-6.
[4]	何喜军, 魏国丹, 武玉英. 基于模糊证据推理的汽车制造产业网络环境复杂性测度[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(2): 173-182.
[5]	林杨, 王应明, 陈圣群. 基于证据推理与最优指派策略的多属性单边匹配决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(6): 47-52.
[6]	陈圣群, 王应明, 施海柳. 基于序数偏差融合度的动态匹配决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(1): 59-65.
[7]	张晓, 樊治平. 一种基于证据推理的多指标多标度大群体决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(2): 15-20.