基于DPSIR模型的城市大气环境发展指数研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2017.0173

运筹与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 147-153.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0173

基于DPSIR模型的城市大气环境发展指数研究

杨文培¹, 何曙慧¹, 王建民², 杨璠³

1.中国计量大学经济与管理学院,浙江杭州 310018;
2.安徽理工大学经济与管理学院,安徽淮南 232001;
3.浙江经贸职业技术学院,浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2017-04-22 出版日期:2017-07-25
作者简介:杨文培(1963-),男,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为区域可持续发展;何曙慧(1991-),男,硕士生,研究方向为环境资源管理;王建民(1978-),男,副教授,博士,研究方向为非线性经济;杨璠(1990-),通讯作者,女,讲师,研究方向为社会责任、会计等。
基金资助:
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题成果(17NDJC340YBM);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71473001);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY14G030017);杭州市软科学项目(20160834M38,20160834M15);安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重大项目(SK2014ZD026);本文受浙江省人文社科基地“管理科学与工程” 和浙江省哲社重点研究基地“产业发展政策研究中心”资助

Study on the Development Index of Urban AtmosphericEnvironment Based on DPSIR Model

YANG Wen-pei¹, HE Shu-hui¹, WANG Jian-ming², YANG Fan³

1.School of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
2.School of Economics and Management, Anhui University Of Science And Technology, Huainan 232001, China;
3.Zhejiang Institute of Economics and Trade, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2017-04-22 Online:2017-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着我国工业化和城市化进程的不断加快,城市大气环境发展状况越来越受到学术界的关注。针对城市化进程等因素给城市大气环境带来的挑战和威胁, 文章将指数的概念引入到城市大气环境评价领域,根据城市化等因素与城市大气环境发展变化之间的响应机理,基于DPSIR模型建立了一套城市大气环境发展指数测度指标体系与方法,并以杭州市为例,对该市2005~2014年的大气环境发展指数进行了测度和分析。文章为城市大气环境发展状况进行测度和对比分析提供了一套方法体系,使城市大气环境发展指数服务于政府管理者、城市居民等利益相关者,为城市大气环境发展管理带来新变革。

关键词: 大气环境, 城市化, 环境发展指数, DPSIR

Abstract: With the accelerated process of industrialization and urbanization in China, the development of urban atmospheric environment has attracted more and more attention from the academic circle. The urbanization process and other factors to urban atmospheric environment brings challenges and threats, and therefore, the index concept is introduced to the field of urban atmospheric environment evaluation, according to factors such as urbanization and urban atmospheric environment between the development of the response mechanism. Based on DPSIR model it establishes a set of urban atmospheric environment development index to measure index system. Taking Hangzhou as an example, we measure and analyze the city’s 2005~2014 atmospheric environment development index. For urban atmospheric environment development status of measure and comparative analysis it provides a set of method systems, making the urban atmospheric environment development index serve the government management, urban residents and other stakeholders, and bring new changes for the development of urban atmospheric environment management.

Key words: atmospheric environment, urbanization, environmental development index, DPSIR

中图分类号:

F290

杨文培, 何曙慧, 王建民, 杨璠. 基于DPSIR模型的城市大气环境发展指数研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7): 147-153.

YANG Wen-pei, HE Shu-hui, WANG Jian-ming, YANG Fan. Study on the Development Index of Urban AtmosphericEnvironment Based on DPSIR Model[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(7): 147-153.

参考文献

[1] Jago-on K A B, Kaneko S, Fujikura R, et al. Urbanization and subsurface environmental issues: an attempt at DPSIR model application in asian cities[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407(9): 3089-3104.
[2] Koornneef J, Ramírez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A. The environmental impact and risk assessment of CO2 capture, transport and storage-an evaluation of the knowledge base[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, 38(1): 62-86.
[3] Wang C, Qu A Y, Wang P F, etc. Estuarine ecosystem health assessment based on the DPSIR framework: a case of the yangtze estuary, China[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No.65, 2013.
[4] Svarstad H, Petersen L K, Rothman D, Siepel H, Wtzold F. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR[J].Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(1): 116-125.
[5] Lin Y C, Huang S L, Budd W W. Assessing the environmental impacts of high-altitude agriculture in taiwan: a driver-pressure-state-impact-response(DPSIR)framework and spatial emergy synthesis[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 32: 42-50.
[6] 杨俊,李雪铭,孙才志,徐惠民.基于DPSRC模型的大连城市环境空间分异[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2008,18(5):86-89.
[7] Organization for economic cooperation and development. OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews[M]. Environmental Monograph No.83, OECD, Pairs, 1993.
[8] 王海宾,陈晓文,于婧.DPSIR框架研究综述[J].经济研究导刊,2013,(19):4-5.
[9] 高珊,黄贤金.基于PSR框架的1953-2008年中国生态建设成效评价[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2):340-350.
[10] 宋国君,金书秦,冯时.论环境政策评估的一般模式[J].环境污染与防治,2011,33(5):100-106.
[11] 焦荔,马万里,洪盛茂,等.杭州灰霾现象与环境空气质量的差异比较[J].环境科学与技术,2012,35(7):50-76.
[12] 王伟武,陈超.杭州城市空气污染物空间分布及其影响因子的定量分析[J].地理研究,2008,27(2):241-250.
[13] Sou N M, Satoru C, Tazuko M, et al. Evaluation of non-methane hydrocarbon(NMHC)emissions based on an ambient air measurement in tokyo area, japan[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(38): 4982-4993.
[14] Bjorkegren A B, Grimmond C S B, Kotthaus S, et al. CO2 emission estimation in the urban environment: measurement of the CO2 storage term[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 122(12): 775-790.
[15] Amorim J H, Rodrigues V, Tavares R, et al. CFD modeling of the aerodynamic effect of trees on urban air pollution dispersion[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 461(9): 541-551.
[16] 杨文培,李连石.模糊数学方法在矿井自然地质条件评价中的应用[J].运筹与管理,1999,8(01):68-73.
[17] 卢小丽,秦晓楠.沿海城市生态安全系统结构及稳定性研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(09):2433-2441.
[18] Nunally J C. Psychometric theory: 2nd ed.[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978. 13-24.
[19] Petter S, Staraub D, Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information system research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, (31): 623-656.
[20] Chin W W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1998, (22): 7-16.
[21] 童其慧.主成分分析方法在指标综合评价中的应用[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2002,(1):59-61.
[22] 余锦华,杨维权.多元统计分析与应用[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2005.2.

基于DPSIR模型的城市大气环境发展指数研究

Study on the Development Index of Urban AtmosphericEnvironment Based on DPSIR Model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics