碳交易驱动下建筑业主最优碳减排决策研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0385

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 65-71.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0385

碳交易驱动下建筑业主最优碳减排决策研究

宋向南¹, 卢昱杰², 申立银³

1.广州大学管理学院,广东广州 510006;
2.同济大学土木工程学院,上海 200092;
3.重庆大学管理科学与房地产学院,重庆 400045

收稿日期:2020-02-26 出版日期:2021-12-25
作者简介:宋向南(1989-),女,河南南阳人,博士,讲师。研究方向为能源行为与政策,建筑节能减排。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71904032);广东省青年创新人才类项目(2018WQNCX145)

Building Owners' Optimal Decision of Carbon Emissions Reduction Considering Cap-and-trade Scheme

SONG Xiang-nan¹, LU Yu-jie², SHEN Li-yin³

1. School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China;
2. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

Received:2020-02-26 Online:2021-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对碳排放总量和强度都持续刚性增长的建筑领域,利用市场机制,借助碳交易来控制和减少其碳排放是一项重大的制度创新。本文通过构建多目标决策优化模型,探讨建筑业主在碳交易驱动形成的复杂动态环境下的最优碳减排策略;并基于实证数据进行情景耕耘,模拟和预测业主减排策略的动态适应性调整。研究发现:①业主碳减排决策受政府补贴强度和违规惩罚倍率调整的冲击更为显著;②目前碳市场“一刀切”的惩罚倍率极易使建筑业主陷入“明罚实奖”的惩罚悖论;③政府应采用“补贴退坡”政策并对不同类型的建筑业主进行精准补贴。

关键词: 碳交易, 建筑业主, 碳减排, 决策优化

Abstract: To the huge environmental impact brought by the building sector in China, it is a significant institutional innovation to employ market-based mechanisms to control and reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. This research, firstly, explores the building owner's optimal strategy in the increasingly complex and dynamic environment driven by carbon trading by establishing a multi-objective optimization model. And then, an empirical study based on practical data has been conducted to predict the dynamic adaptive adjustment of carbon reduction decision by the owners in different scenarios.The results show that owners' carbon reduction decision is heavily influenced by the fluctuation in the intensity of subsidy and penalty. Besides, it is found that the one-size-fits-all penalty multiplier in the current carbon market is easy to make owners' illegal emissions fall into the punishment paradox of “rewards for explicit punishment”. Furthermore, the government should adopt the policy of “retrograde subsidy” and carry out precise subsidies to different owners.

Key words: carbon trading, building owner, carbon emissions reduction, decision optimization

中图分类号:

F272.3

宋向南, 卢昱杰, 申立银. 碳交易驱动下建筑业主最优碳减排决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 65-71.

SONG Xiang-nan, LU Yu-jie, SHEN Li-yin. Building Owners' Optimal Decision of Carbon Emissions Reduction Considering Cap-and-trade Scheme[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(12): 65-71.

参考文献

[1] 中国建筑能耗研究报告(2019)[R].中国建筑节能协会,2019.
[2] Ma H, Du N, Yu S, et al. Analysis of typical public building energy consumption in northern China[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2017, 136: 139-150.
[3] Wu S, Zheng X, Wei C. Measurement of inequality using household energy consumption data in rural China[J]. Nature Energy, 2017, 2(10): 795-803.
[4] Zhou N, Khanna N, Feng W, et al. Scenarios of energy efficiency and CO₂ emissions reduction potential in the buildings sector in China to year 2050[J]. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(11): 978-984.
[5] Bertram C, Luderer G, Pietzcker R C, et al. Complementing carbon prices with technology policies to keep climate targets within reach[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5(3): 235-239.
[6] 郭道燕,陈红,龙如银.消费端碳交易市场中政府初始碳配额分配策略研究——基于政府和家庭演化博弈的视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(4):43-54.
[7] 李晔,李文翔,魏愚獒.道路交通碳排放权交易研究现状与展望[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(4):465-471.
[8] Qi L, Liu L, Jiang L, et al. Optimal operation strategies under a carbon cap-and-trade mechanism: a capital-constrained supply chain incorporating risk aversion[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020. 1-17.
[9] 汪明月,刘宇,史文强,李梦明,钟超.碳交易政策下低碳技术异地协同共享策略及减排收益研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(6):1419-1434.
[10] Lam P T I, Chan E H W, Ann T W, et al. Mitigating climate change in the building sector[J]. Facilities, 2014.
[11] Shen L, Song X, Wu Y, et al. Interpretive structural modeling based factor analysis on the implementation of emission trading system in the chinese building sector[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 127: 214-227.
[12] Jeong K, Hong T, Chae M, et al. Development of a decision support model for determining the target multi-family housing complex for green remodeling using data mining techniques[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2019, 202: 109401.
[13] Karmellos M, Kiprakis A, Mavrotas G. A multi-objective approach for optimal prioritization of energy efficiency measures in buildings: model, software and case studies[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 139: 131-150.
[14] Chen Y, Jiang P, Dong W, et al. Analysis on the carbon trading approach in promoting sustainable buildings in China[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 84: 130-137.
[15] Kontokosta C E, Spiegel-Feld D, Papadopoulos S. The impact of mandatory energy audits on building energy use[J]. Nature Energy, 2020, 5(4): 309-316.
[16] Lai J, Lu M. Analysis and benchmarking of carbon emissions of commercial buildings[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2019, 199: 445-454.
[17] 卫同济.环境违规对企业声誉的影响研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2014.
[18] Lee K, Han T W. How vulnerable is the emissions market to transaction costs?: an ABMS approach[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 90: 273-286.
[19] 深圳市住房和建设局.深圳市建筑物碳排放权交易效益及风险评估报告[R].深圳市住房研究会,2016.
[20] Song X, Lu Y, Shen L, et al. Will China's building sector participate in emission trading system? insights from modelling an owner's optimal carbon reduction strategies[J]. Energy policy, 2018, 118: 232-244.
[21] 金帅,张洋,杜建国.动态惩罚机制下企业环境行为分析与规制策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(S1):637-644.
[22] 史学瀛,杨博文.控排企业碳交易未达履约目标的罚则设定[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(4):35-42.

碳交易驱动下建筑业主最优碳减排决策研究

Building Owners' Optimal Decision of Carbon Emissions Reduction Considering Cap-and-trade Scheme

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	黄肖玲, 任宇婷, 张佳安, 王丹, 陈继红, 罗勋杰. 基于低碳环保因素的“前港后厂”钢铁产成品运输网络优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 59-66.
[2]	秦娟娟, 李婧. 碳交易机制下资金约束制造商替代产品的最优生产策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 88-94.
[3]	范定祥, 李重莲, 王晓蕾. 基于Stackelberg博弈的闭环供应链回收模式选择及其优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 135-141.
[4]	李小燕, 王道平. 碳交易机制下考虑竞争和信息非对称的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 47-52.
[5]	夏良杰, 柳慧, 黄迎, 李友东, 孙莹. 碳交易规制下的制造商减排外包模式选择:定制vs订购?[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 199-205.
[6]	林欢, 马骋, 孙琦, 李丹. 企业社会责任下碳减排优化策略与协调机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 29-35.
[7]	刘丽, 张再生, 王哲. 基于双边匹配-动态博弈的碳减排技术投资决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 20-26.
[8]	汪明月,刘宇,钟超,李梦明,史文强. 区域合作减排策略选择及提升对策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 35-45.
[9]	魏广明, 任丽果, 秦娟娟, 马亚明. 低碳双渠道供应链的需求信息共享策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 45-56.
[10]	夏良杰, 白永万, 秦娟娟, 李友东. 碳交易规制下信息不对称供应链的减排和低碳推广博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 37-45.
[11]	徐建中, 付静雯. 低碳背景下装备制造企业碳减排研究:一个演化博弈视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(5): 40-48.
[12]	曹细玉, 张杰芳. 碳减排补贴与碳税下的供应链碳减排决策优化与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 57-61.
[13]	王道平, 李小燕, 赵亮. 碳交易机制下考虑制造商竞争的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 62-71.
[14]	周熙登. 考虑品牌差异的双渠道供应链减排与低碳宣传策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(11): 93-99.
[15]	马常松, 罗振宇. 随机需求下考虑碳限额与交易规制的企业生产策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(1): 268-274.