运筹与管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 226-232.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2025.0398

• 管理科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

不利天气下考虑公益性的农产品供应链补贴机制研究

覃燕红, 张杨, 张兵   

  1. 重庆理工大学 管理学院,重庆 400054
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-17 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2026-04-29
  • 通讯作者: 覃燕红(1981-),女,四川峨眉人,博士,教授,研究方向:农产品供应链。Email: qinyanhong24@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金资助项目(23FGLB077);重庆市教委社会科学规划重大项目(23SKGH245)
       

Mechanism of Subsidy for Agricultural Product Supply Chain Considering Public Welfare in Adverse Weather

QIN Yanhong, ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Bing   

  1. School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China
  • Received:2023-10-17 Online:2025-12-25 Published:2026-04-29

摘要: 为了研究农产品供应链面临不利天气时政府补贴对农产品供应链决策的影响,本文在不利天气影响农产品质量的情况下,考虑农产品供应链成员执行公益性,建立无政府补贴、产出补贴、收购补贴、采购补贴和销售补贴五种情形下农业合作社和公司的Stackelberg博弈模型,分析不利天气、公益性和多种补贴方式对农产品供应链最优决策的影响,并从农产品质价比、消费者剩余、社会整体福利和补贴资金使用效率四个方面分析最优补贴策略。研究表明:不利天气不仅会降低农产品质量和农产品供应链利润,还会减少消费者剩余和社会整体福利;农业合作社和公司执行公益性都能缓解不利天气对农产品供应链的负面影响,但会造成自身利润受损,导致农业合作社无执行公益性的动力,而公司执行公益性的程度受限;政府补贴能有效提升农业合作社和公司的利润,提高双方执行公益性的积极性;从提高农产品质价比、改善消费者剩余和社会整体福利角度,政府应补贴农业合作社且采取产出补贴;从提高补贴资金使用效率角度,政府应补贴公司且采取销售补贴。

关键词: 农产品供应链, 政府补贴, 不利天气, 公益性

Abstract: In recent years, frequent adverse weather has brought great losses to agricultural production in China, and the randomness of market demand has further intensified the difficulty of agricultural product supply chain operation. To ensure stable production and supply of grain and important agricultural products, and improve the income guarantee mechanism of farmers, the government needs to implement subsidy for the agricultural product supply chain, and the weak nature of agriculture also requires that the government must implement subsidy. At the same time, the government builds a public welfare market for the purpose of “providing public services at a low price or for a low profit”, and members of the agricultural product supply chain actively perform public welfare functions to establish positive corporate image to obtain sustainable profit. Therefore, in adverse weather, it is of great significance to study the influence of public welfare and government subsidy on the optimal decision-making of agricultural product supply chain for proposing the optimal government subsidy strategy so as to reduce weather risks in agricultural production, accelerate the construction of public welfare market, and improve the operational stability of agricultural product supply chain.
In this paper, by describing the random profit function of adverse weather affecting the quality of agricultural products, the public welfare of the agricultural cooperative and company is introduced into the government subsidy mechanism of agricultural product supply chain, and a Stackelberg game model is constructed without subsidy as the benchmark. When the agricultural cooperative performs public welfare, the government implements output subsidy or purchase subsidy to the agricultural cooperative. When the company performs public welfare, thegovernment will implement procurement subsidy or sale subsidy for the company. Finally, through a sensitivity analysis, comparative analysis and numerical simulation, the effects of adverse weather, public welfare and various subsidies on the optimal decision-making of agricultural product supply chain are analyzed, and the optimal subsidy strategy is proposed from four aspects: quality-price ratio of agricultural products, consumer surplus, overall social welfare and the utilization efficiency of government subsidy funds.
The results show that: Firstly, the public welfare of the agricultural cooperative and company can alleviate the negative impact of adverse weather on the agricultural product supply chain, but the implementation of public welfare by the agricultural cooperative reduces their own profit, resulting in no incentive to implement public welfare. However, the stronger public welfare of the company will damage the company’s profit, resulting in the limited extent of the company’s public welfare.
Secondly, when the government subsidizes the agricultural cooperative, the incentive effect of output subsidy will be greater than purchase subsidy in terms of improving the quality-price ratio of agricultural products, consumer surplus and overall social welfare, but the utilization efficiency of government subsidy funds will be lower than purchase subsidy. When the government subsidizes the company, the incentive effect of procurement subsidy will be greater than sale subsidy in terms of improving the quality-price ratio of agricultural products, consumer surplus and overall social welfare, but the utilization efficiency of government subsidy funds will be lower than sale subsidy.
Finally, by comparing the output subsidy with the procurement subsidy, we find that the output subsidy has the best incentive effect, and the government should adopt the output subsidy for agricultural cooperative. By comparing the purchase subsidy with the sale subsidy, the utilization rate of the funds receiving the sale subsidy is the highest, so the government should adopt the sale subsidy.

Key words: agricultural product supply chain, government subsidy, adverse weather, public welfare

中图分类号: