有限注意力下一类满意启发式决策的建模与理性分析

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0078

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 57-62.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0078

有限注意力下一类满意启发式决策的建模与理性分析

吴新林^1,2, 肖海燕^1,2

1.湖北第二师范学院数学与经济学院,湖北武汉 430205;
2.湖北第二师范学院大数据建模与智能计算研究所,湖北武汉 430205

收稿日期:2019-12-10 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-04-12
作者简介:吴新林(1981-),男,湖北黄冈人,副教授,博士,研究方向:决策理论与方法;肖海燕(1979-),女,湖北荆州人,副教授,博士,研究方向:博弈论、机制设计。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71701076);湖北省自然科学基金资助项目(2019CFB782)

Modeling and Rationality Analysis on the Satisficing Heuristic Decision under Limited Attention

WU Xin-lin^1,2, XIAO Hai-yan^1,2

1. School of Mathematics and Economics, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan 430205, China;
2. Institute of Big Data Modeling and Intelligent Computing, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan 430205, China

Received:2019-12-10 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-04-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在决策者有限注意力下,现实生活中决策人的选择行为往往表现出一类“满意启发式”特征。基于个体决策者偏好的不完备性,借助方案集系列、考虑集等相关概念探讨了满意启发式决策规则的建模;论证了方案集系列可观与部分可观条件下一类满意决策函数的存在性,以及基于相关理性条件的理性特征,并结合顾客购买行为案例的仿真实验对所建立的满意决策模型进行了验证。仿真结果表明决策者在时间紧逼和信息不完整的情形下可以通过排除部分方案的方式保证以最大概率选到满意方案。研究结果可为现实生活中决策人在时间紧迫、信息缺失等情形下的选择提供一定的理论参考与指导,也可作为一类满意决策研究的理论基础。

关键词: 有限注意力, 满意启发式, 不完备偏好, 有限理性

Abstract: A decision maker under limited attention in the real world behaves according to the so-called satisfying heuristic proposed by Herbert Simon. We propose a descriptive model of satisfying heuristic in which the decision maker's preferences are incomplete by utilizing the concepts of menu sequences and consideration sets and so on. The existence and rationality of satisfying decisions under observable menu sequences and partially observable menu sequences are discussed respectively combined with some rationality conditions. Further, some simulation experiments about an application case of consumer shopping are conducted to illustrate our model. The simulation results show that in the case of time constraint and incomplete information, the consumer can ensure that the satisfactory alternative can be selected with the maximum probability by excluding parts of the alternatives. The results can provide the decision maker with theoretical reference values in case of time pressure, limited information, etc. It can also be the theoretical foundation for the study on the satisfying decision.

Key words: limited attention, satisfying heuristic, incomplete preferences, bounded rationality

中图分类号:

C934

吴新林, 肖海燕. 有限注意力下一类满意启发式决策的建模与理性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 57-62.

WU Xin-lin, XIAO Hai-yan. Modeling and Rationality Analysis on the Satisficing Heuristic Decision under Limited Attention[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(3): 57-62.

参考文献

[1] Simon H A. Behavioral model of rational choice[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, 69(1): 99-118.
[2] Radner R. Satisficing[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1975, 2(2): 253-262.
[3] Matsuda T, Takastu S. Characterization of satisficing decision criterion[J]. Information Sciences, 1979, 17(2): 131-151.
[4] Matsuda T, Takastu S. Algebraic prope-rities of satisficing decision criterion[J]. Information Sciences, 1979, 17(2): 221-237.
[5] Tyson C J. Cognitive constraints, contr-action consistency and the satisficing criterion[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2008, 138(1): 51-70.
[6] Manski C. Optimize, satisfice, or choo-se without deliberation? a simple mini-max-regret assessment[J]. Theory and Decision, 2017, 83(2): 155-173.
[7] Aguiar V H, Boccardi M J, Dean M. Satisficing and stochastic choice[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2016, 166(6): 445-482.
[8] Aguiar V H. Random categorization and bounded rationality[J]. Economics Letters, 2017,159(10): 46-52.
[9] González-Valdés F, de Dios Ortúzar J. The stochastic satisficing model: a bounded rationality discrete choice model[J]. Journal of choice modelling, 2018, 27(2): 74-87.
[10] Aguiar V H, Kimya M. Adaptive stoch-astic search[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2019, 81(3): 74-83.
[11] Kovach M, Ülkü L. Satisficing with a variable threshold[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2020, 87(3): 67-76.
[12] Rubinstein A, Salant Y. A model of choice from lists[J]. Theoretical Economics, 2006, 1(1): 3-17.
[13] Caplin A, Dean M. Search, choice, and revealed preference[J]. Theoretical Economics, 2011, 6(1): 19-48.
[14] Papi M. Satisficing choice procedures[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2012, 84(1): 451-462.
[15] Masatlioglu Y, Nakajima D, Ozbay E Y. Revealed attention[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(5): 2183-2205.
[16] Masatlioglu Y, Nakajima D. Choice by iterative search[J]. Theoretical Econo-mics, 2013, 8(3): 701-728.
[17] Lleras J S, Masatlioglu Y, Nakajima D, et al. When more is less: limited consideration[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2017,170(7): 70-85.
[18] Kimya M. Choice, consideration sets, and attribute filters[J]. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2018, 10(4): 223-247.
[19] Alonso A, ülkü L. Luce rule with limit-Ed consideration[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2018, 93(5): 52-56.
[20] Caplin A, Dean M, Leahy J. Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2019, 86(3): 1061-1094.

有限注意力下一类满意启发式决策的建模与理性分析

Modeling and Rationality Analysis on the Satisficing Heuristic Decision under Limited Attention

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	蒋惠凤, 刘益平. 基于演化博弈的大运河文化带城市间合作发展策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 175-182.
[2]	陈刚, 付江月, 何美玲. 考虑居民选择行为的应急避难场所选址问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 6-14.
[3]	严杰,刘人境. 基于Agent仿真的个体有限理性与众包绩效的关系研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(12): 115-124.
[4]	张广, 邬冬华, 唐剑雄. 不确定性下的一主多从博弈及其ε-平衡稳定性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 23-30.
[5]	李健, 李琳琳, 史浩. 考虑消费者有限理性退货决策的两阶段C2B电子商务供应链回购策略优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(12): 53-60.
[6]	丁占文, 葛栋梁, 蒋书敏. 基于多期有限理性的可再生资源寡头博弈模型与分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(5): 140-145.