全要素生产率如何影响我国制造业企业的区位选址决策

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0167

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 新经济地理理论以及新近发展的“‘新’新经济地理理论”认为,高生产率企业通过集聚效应和选择效应存在于规模较大的市场,本文在后者理论框架下考察中国企业区位选址这一被忽视的问题。运用中国1999~2007年297个地级及以上城市100多万家企业的微观数据,采用倾向得分匹配方法克服样本选择性偏误,本文发现:相比低生产率企业组,高生产率企业选址于更大规模的城市。而且,这种选址倾向在不同区域和企业所有制上具有差异表现:相比传统中、西部地区,东部地区高生产率企业选址于大城市的倾向更为明显;相比集体企业,港澳台、外商及私营企业的这种倾向性更为显著,且估计结果显示国有企业选址不受全要素生产率水平的影响。以上发现为我国制造业企业区位选址决策的制定提供了新的思路。

关键词: 区位选址决策, 倾向得分匹配, 企业

Abstract: New Economic Geography and New New Economic Geography which is developed recently indicate that firms with higher tfp will select more larger markets through agglomeration effect and selection effect.This paper studies the problem of Chinese firms’regional location based on the latter theory framework. Using more than one million firms’records of Chinese 297 prefecture-level and above cities during 1999~2007 and propensity score matching method to solve the problem of selectivity bias,the results indicate that:comparing to firms with lower tfp,firms with more higher tfp select more larger cities.What’s more,this location decision is different in different regions and firm’s ownership:comparing to traditional central and western regions,the trend of higher tfp firms selecting larger cities is more obvious in eastern region. Comparing to collective firms, this trend of HMT(Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan)firms,foreign and private firms is more illustrious, and results show that state-owned firms’regional location decision is not affected by tfp.The results above provide a new solution for the policy-making of Chinese manufacturing regional location.

Key words: economic system and analysis, regional location decisions, propensity score matching, firm

中图分类号:

F272

逯宇铎,戴美虹,刘海洋. 全要素生产率如何影响我国制造业企业的
区位选址决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(5): 116-125.

LU Yu-duo, DAI Mei-hong, LIU Hai-yang. How Does TFP Affect Chinese Manufacturing Firms’Regional
Location Decisions？[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(5): 116-125.

参考文献

[1]陈钊,陆铭.从分割到融合:城乡经济增长与社会和谐的政治经济学[J].经济研究,2008,(1):21-32.
[2]程开明.城市化促进技术创新的机制及证据[J].科研管理,2010,31(2):26-34.
[3]王雅莉,齐昕.中国城市化经济发展效应解析[J].经济学家,2013,(8):102-104.
[4]陆铭,蒋仕卿,陈钊,佐藤宏.摆脱城市化的低水平均衡——制度推动、社会互动与劳动力流动[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2013,(3):48-167.
[5]Venables A J. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries[J]. International Economic Review, 1996, 37(2): 341-359.
[6] 李新,苏兆国,史本山.基于区位选择的中国工业生产企业空间集聚研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(4):549-557.
[7] 刘庆林,汪明珠,韩军伟.市场关联效应与跨国企业选址——基于中国数据的检验[J].财贸经济,2011,(11):127-135.
[8] Isard W. Location and space-economy: a general relating industrial location, market size, land use and urban structure[M]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1956. 1-350.
[9] Moses L N. Location and theory of production[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1958, 72(2): 259-272.
[10]Pontes J P. Industrial clusters and peripheral areas[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2003, 35(11): 2053-2068.
[11]郝寿义,倪方树,林坦,方兴.企业区位选择与空间集聚的博弈分析[J].南开经济研究,2011,(3):69-78.
[12]池仁勇.区域中小企业创新网络的结点联结及其效率评价研究[J].管理世界,2007,(1):105-121.
[13]孟韬.空间变化、结构调整与三线企业的集群创新[J].改革,2013,(1):35-40.
[14]Krugman P. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1979, 9(4): 469-479.
[15]Fujita M, Thisse J F. Economics of agglomeration[J]. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1996, 10(4): 339-378.
[16]Baldwin R E, Martin P, Ottaviano G I P. Global income divergence, trade, and industrialization: the geography of growth take-offs[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2001, 6(1): 5-37.
[17]Neary J P. Of hype and hyperbolas: introducing the new economic geography[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39(2): 536-561.
[18]Melitz M J, Ottaviano G I P. Market size, trade, and productivity[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2008, 75(3): 295-316.
[19]Baldwin R E, Okubo T. Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2006, 6(3): 323-346.
[20]李福柱.“新”新经济地理学研究进展[J].经济学动态,2011,(6):98-102.
[21]李晓萍,江飞涛.企业异质性与经济地理研究新进展[J].经济学动态,2011,(10):114-118.
[22]刘海洋,孔祥贞,汤二子.基于微观异质性的新新经济地理研究[J].财经科学,2012,(4):62-70.
[23]Saito H, Gopinath M. Plants self-selection, agglomeration economies and regional productivity in Chile[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2009, 9(4): 539-558.
[24]Okubo T, Picard P M, Thisse J F. The spatial selection of heterogeneous firms[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2010, 82(2): 230-237.
[25]刘海洋,马靖,宋巧.中国地级以上城市的工资差异:原因及趋势[J].中国软科学,2012,(5):93-102.
[26]Campbell J R, Hopenhayn H A. Market size matters[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2005, 53(1): 1-25.
[27]Syverson C. Prices, spatial competition and heterogeneous producers: an empirical test[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2007, 55(2): 197-222.
[28]谢千里,罗斯基,张秩凡.中国工业生产率的增长与收敛[J].经济学(季刊),2008,7(3):809-826.
[29]Levinsohn J, Petrin A. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2003, 70(2): 317-341.
[30]亓朋,许和连,艾洪山.外商直接投资企业对内资企业的溢出效应:对中国制造业企业的实证研究[J].管理世界,2008,(4):58-68.
[31]赵伟,赵金亮.生产率决定中国企业出口倾向吗——企业所有制异质性视角的分析[J].财贸经济,2011,(5):100-105.
[32]Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J]. Biometrika, 1983, 70(1): 41-55.
[33]Heckman J J, Ichimura H, Todd P E. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1998, 65(2): 261-294.
[34]Lechner M. Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption[M]. Verlag: Phsical-verlag heidelberg, 2001. 43-58.
[35]Abadie A, Imbens G. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects[J]. Econometrica, 2006, 74(1): 235-267.
[36]邵敏,包群.出口企业转型对中国劳动力就业与工资的影响:基于倾向评分匹配估计的经验分析[J].世界经济,2011,(6);48-70.
[37]刘海洋,孔祥贞,马婧.补贴扭曲了中国工业企业的购买行为吗？——基于讨价还价理论的分析[J].管理世界,2012,(10):119-145.