创新驱动模式下战略性新兴产业政府补贴策略分析

doi:10.12005/orms.2017.0250

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对政府补贴难以激励战略性新兴产业形成创新驱动力的问题,以新能源汽车产业为例,构建了一个旨在促进企业技术研发的政府创新补贴策略分析模型。假设产业呈现明显的创新驱动特征,模型分别针对政府理性决策与有限理性决策的情况,对政府创新补贴及企业创新投入策略进行了博弈均衡分析,并讨论了技术创新环境的改善对最优策略及局中人收益的影响。结果表明,在创新驱动模式下,企业最优创新投入比例对政府补贴水平不敏感,且过高的补贴可能挤出企业创新投入,容易形成企业套利空间。此外,改善技术创新环境对强化企业市场主体地位,弱化政府管制对市场的干预具有积极作用。

关键词: 管理科学与工程, 创新补贴, 动态博弈, 创新驱动, 新能源汽车产业

Abstract: With green car industry for example, a dynamic game model between government and enterprises is built to adjust subsidy strategies, promote R&D investment and it tries to deal with the problem: innovation subsidies can hardly help strategic emerging industries enhance innovation-driven force. Assume that green car industry is characterized by innovation-driven, subsidy strategies and innovation investment strategies under government rational decision and bounded rational decision are analyzed, and the impact on equilibrium strategies by improved innovation environment is discussed. The results indicate that with the industry innovation driven, enterprises’ optimum innovation investment ratio is not sensitive to subsidies. Excessive subsidies may crowd out enterprises’ innovation investment, and tend to raise the possibility of enterprise arbitrage. Besides, improved innovation environment contributes to enterprises’ market principal position, and could weaken market intervention caused by government regulations.

Key words: management science and engineering, innovation subsidies, dynamic game theory, innovation drive, green car industry

中图分类号:

F224.32

秦字兴. 创新驱动模式下战略性新兴产业政府补贴策略分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(10): 173-180.

QIN Zi-xing. Analysis of Subsidy Strategies against Strategic Emerging Industries Characterized by Innovation Driving Mode[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(10): 173-180.

参考文献

[1] David M L, Terleckyj N E. Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: a macroeconomic analysis[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1983, (2): 551-561.
[2] Griliches, Zvi. Productivity, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970’s[J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76: 142-154.
[3] David P A, Hall B H, Toole A A. Is Public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? a review of the econometric evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4/5): 497-529.
[4] Guellec D, Van Pottelsberghe B. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2003, 12(3): 225-243.
[5] Binelli C, Maffioli A. A micro-econometric analysis of public support to private R&D in argentina[J]. International Review of Applied Economics,2007, (3): 339-359.
[6] Gonzalez X, Pazo C. Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?[J]. Research Policy, 2008, (3): 371-389.
[7] Carboni O A. R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing data[J]. International Review of Applied Economics, 2011, (4): 419- 439.
[8] Gorg H, Strobl E. The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D[J]. Economica, 2007, (294): 215-234.
[9] Lee C Y. The differential effects of public R&D support on firm R&D: theory and evidence from multi-country data[J]. Technovation, 2011, (5- 6): 256-269.
[10] 程华,赵祥.政府科技资助对企业R&D产出的影响——基于我国大中型工业企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(3):519-525.
[11] 李平,王春晖.政府科技资助对企业技术创新的非线性研究——基于中国2001~2008年省级面板数据的门槛回归分析[J].中国软科学,2010,(8):137-147.
[12] 翟海燕,董静,汪江平.政府科技补贴对企业研发投入的作用——基于企业面板数据的研究[J].现代管理科学,2014,(9):24-26.
[13] Kelette T J, Moen J, Griliches Z. Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? microeconomic evaluation studies[J]. Research Policy, 2000 (29): 471- 495.
[14] 胡永健,周寄中.政府直接资助强度与企业技术创新投入的关系研究[J].中国软科学,2008,(11):141-148.
[15] 许国艺,史永,杨德伟.政府研发补贴的政策促进效应研究[J].软科学,2014,28(9):24-26.
[16] 戴小勇,成力为.财政补贴政策对企业研发投入的门槛效应[J].科研管理,2014,35(6):68-76.
[17] 吴晓晓,苏朝晖.政府资助与企业研发投入——基于面板数据门槛模型的实证研究[J].软科学,2015,29(9):38- 42.
[18] Hussinger K. R&D and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2008, (6): 729-747.
[19] Laincz C. R&D subsidies in a model of growth with dynamic market structure[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2009,19(5), 643- 673.
[20] Gómez M, Sequeira T. Optimal R&D subsidies in a model with physical capital, human capital and varieties[J]. Economic Modelling, 2013, (30), 217-224.
[21] 生延超.创新投入补贴还是创新产品补贴: 技术联盟的政府策略选择[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(6):184-192.
[22] 方海燕,达庆利,朱长宁.政府不同研发补贴政策下的企业市场绩效[J].工业工程,2012,15(2):33- 40.
[23] Garau G, Lecca P. The impact of regional R&D subsidy in a computable general equilibrium model[J]. International Regional Science Review, 2015, 38(4): 319-357.
[24] Takalo T, Tanayama T. Adverse selection & financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies?[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2010, 35(1): 16- 41.
[25] Meuleman M, De Maeseneire W. Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing?[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 4(41): 580-591.
[26] 邹彩芬,刘双,王丽,等.政府R&D补贴、企业研发实力及其行为效果研究[J].工业技术经济,2013,(240):117-125.
[27] Oikawa K, Managi S. R&D in clean technology: a project choice model with learning[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015, (117): 175-195.
[28] 王海啸,缪小明.我国新能源汽车研发补贴的博弈研究[J].软科学,2013,27(6):29-32.
[29] 高倩,范明,杜建国.政府补贴对新能源汽车企业影响的演化研究[J].科技管理研究,2014,(11):75-79.
[30] 秦字兴.基于政企博弈的电动汽车研发补贴政策研究[J].工业工程与管理,2016,21(4):127-136.