污染类邻避冲突事件共力耦合演化机理研究——基于耦合协调度模型

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0007

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 47-56.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0007

污染类邻避冲突事件共力耦合演化机理研究——基于耦合协调度模型

康伟, 杜蕾, 曹太鑫

哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150001摘要:随着民主化进程的推进与公民环保意识的觉醒,由部分公共基础设施建设而诱发的邻避冲突事件逐年增多,并呈现出以抗议污染类项目为核心的发展趋势。污染类邻避冲突事件引致因素间耦合作用影响着事件演变方向,因而构建邻避冲突共力耦合模型,探究邻避冲突演化机理具有重要现实意义。基于耦合理论,在分析污染类邻避冲突事件发生的内在引致因素、外在引致因素、情绪引致因素、因素间共力耦合作用及事件内在演化机理的基础上,建立事件耦合度模型和耦合协调度模型,选取“余杭中泰垃圾焚烧厂事件”、“江苏启东事件”、“湖北仙桃垃圾焚烧发电厂事件”三起典型污染类邻避冲突事件探寻引致因素耦合度与邻避冲突发展演化的关系。研究发现,污染类邻避冲突事件引致因素耦合协调度与事件影响力值呈正相关关系,引致因素间耦合协调度与邻避冲突发展演化密切相关;情绪引致因素对污染类邻避冲突事件影响力起着强化推动作用,加速了事件的发展演化进程。研究结果为政府构建污染类邻避冲突事件引致因素阻断机制,多渠道化解民众群体情绪耦合力提供了新思路。关键词:污染类邻避冲突事件;引致因素;共力耦合;耦合协调度中图分类号:C931 文章标识码:A 文章编号:1007-3221202901-0047

收稿日期:2017-11-01 出版日期:2020-01-25
作者简介:康伟(1971-), 女, 博士, 哈尔滨人, 教授, 博士生导师;杜蕾(1992-), 女, 山西晋中人, 博士研究生;曹太鑫(1994-), 男, 山东青岛人, 博士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71774038,71673068);国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA030);黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目(16GLD08)

Research on the Co-Coupling Evolution Mechanism of Pollution NIMBY Conflict Events-Based on Coupling Coordination Degree Model

KANG Wei, DU Lei, CAO Tai-xin

School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

Received:2017-11-01 Online:2020-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着民主化进程的推进与公民环保意识的觉醒,由部分公共基础设施建设而诱发的邻避冲突事件逐年增多,并呈现出以抗议污染类项目为核心的发展趋势。污染类邻避冲突事件引致因素间耦合作用影响着事件演变方向,因而构建邻避冲突共力耦合模型,探究邻避冲突演化机理具有重要现实意义。基于耦合理论,在分析污染类邻避冲突事件发生的内在引致因素、外在引致因素、情绪引致因素、因素间共力耦合作用及事件内在演化机理的基础上,建立事件耦合度模型和耦合协调度模型,选取“余杭中泰垃圾焚烧厂事件”、“江苏启东事件”、“湖北仙桃垃圾焚烧发电厂事件”三起典型污染类邻避冲突事件探寻引致因素耦合度与邻避冲突发展演化的关系。研究发现,污染类邻避冲突事件引致因素耦合协调度与事件影响力值呈正相关关系,引致因素间耦合协调度与邻避冲突发展演化密切相关;情绪引致因素对污染类邻避冲突事件影响力起着强化推动作用,加速了事件的发展演化进程。研究结果为政府构建污染类邻避冲突事件引致因素阻断机制,多渠道化解民众群体情绪耦合力提供了新思路。

关键词: 污染类邻避冲突事件, 引致因素, 共力耦合, 耦合协调度

Abstract: With the development of democracy and citizen's environmental protection consciousness, the NIMBY conflicts caused by the construction of some public infrastructures increase year by year, and show a trend to protest against pollution project as the core. The coupling effect between the factors causing the pollution NIMBY conflict affects the development direction of events. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to construct a Co-Coupling Model of conflict events and explore the mechanism of event evolution. Based on coupling theory and the analysis of the intrinsic induced factors, extrinsic inducedfactors, emotional induced factors, coupling forces between inducedfactors and internal evolutionary mechanism of pollution NIMBY conflict events, selecting three pollution NIMBY events of “Yu hangZhongtai waste incineration plant event”, “Jiangsu Qidong event” and “Hubei Xiantao waste incineration power plant event” as typical cases, the event Co-Coupling Model and the Co-Coupling Coordination Degree Model are constructed in this paper to explore the relationship between the coupling degree of induced factors and the evolution of the pollution NIMBY conflict events.The research finds that there is a positive correlation between the coupling coordination degree and the influence value of the event, and the coupling coordination degree is closely related to the development and evolution of the conflict events; emotional factors in pollution NIMBY conflict play a strengthening push effect on the influence of the pollution NIMBY conflict events, and accelerate the process of the event development and evolution. The research results provide a new idea for the government to build the mechanism of blocking the induced factors of the pollution NIMBY conflict, and provide a new way to resolve the emotional coupling force of the masses.

Key words: pollution NIMBY conflict events, induced factors, co-coupling, coupling coordination degree model

中图分类号:

C931

康伟, 杜蕾, 曹太鑫. 污染类邻避冲突事件共力耦合演化机理研究——基于耦合协调度模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 47-56.

KANG Wei, DU Lei, CAO Tai-xin. Research on the Co-Coupling Evolution Mechanism of Pollution NIMBY Conflict Events-Based on Coupling Coordination Degree Model[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(1): 47-56.

参考文献

[1] 荣婷,谢耘耕.环境群体性事件的发生、传播与应对——基于2003～2014年150起中国重大环境群体事件的实证分析[J].新闻记者,2015,(6):72-79.
[2] O'Hare M. Not on my nbock you don't: facility sitting and the strategic im-portance of compensation[J]. Public Policy, 1977, 24(4): 407-458.
[3] 张乐,童星.“邻避”冲突管理中的决策困境及其解决思路[J].中国行政管理,2014,(4):109-113.
[4] 管在高.邻避型群体性事件产生的原因及预防对策[J].管理学刊,2010(6):58-62.
[5] 孟薇,孔繁斌.邻避冲突的成因分析及其治理工具选择——基于政策利益结构分布的视角[J].江苏行政学院学报,2014,2:119-124.
[6] Besfamille M, Ozachmeur J. NIMBY and mechanism design under different con-stitutional constraints[J]. International Tax Public Finance, 2010, 17(2): 114-132.
[7] Esaiasson P. NIMBY-A re-examination of the phenomenon[J]. Social Science Research, 2014(48): 185-195.
[8] Celalettin S, Alpe E, Orhan G, Nurcihan T. An improved landfill site screening procedure under NIMBY syndrome constraints[J]. Landscape and Urban Plan-ning, 2014,132: 1-15.
[9] 裴广川.环境伦理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002:65.
[10] 古斯塔夫·勒庞.乌合之众:大众心理研究[M].戴光年译.新世界出版社,2010:1.
[11] 侯光辉,王元地.邻避危机何以愈演愈烈——一个整合性归因模型[J].公共管理学报,2014(3):80-92.
[12] 李小敏,胡象明.邻避现象原因新析:风险认知与公众信任的视角[J].中国行政管理,2015,3:131-135.
[13] 彭小兵,谢虹. 应对信息洪流:邻避效应向环境群体性事件转化的机理及治理[J].情报科学,2017,35(2):10-15.
[14] Walker C et al. Adding insult to injury: the development of psychosocial stress in ontario wind turbine communities[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2014, 133(1982): 358-365.
[15] Nakazawa T. Politics of distributive justice in the siting of waste disposal facilities: the case of tokyo[J]. Environmental Politics, 2016, 25(3): 513-534.
[16] Castro P, Seixas E, Neca P, Bettencourt L. Successfully contesting the policy sphere: examining through the press a case of local protests changing new ecological laws[J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 39(1): 107-123.
[17] Song B. Efficient location and allocation strategies for undesirable facilities con-sidering their fundamental properties[J]. Computers& Industrial Engineering, 2013(65): 475-484.
[18] Amy P, Max N. Preferences of Wyoming residents for sitting of energy and resi-dentialdevelopment[J]. Applied geography, 2013, 43: 45-55.
[19] 何艳玲.“中国式”邻避冲突:基于事件的分析[J].开放时代,2009,(12):102-114.
[20] Sung M, Gleicher S, Chenney S. Scalable behaviors for crowd simulation[J]. Computer Graphics Forum, 2004, 23(3): 519-528.
[21] 刘德海,陈静锋.环境群体性事件“信息-权利”协同演化的仿真分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(12):3157-3166.
[22] 张一文,齐佳音,方滨兴,李欲晓.非常规突发事件及其社会影响分析——基于引致因素耦合协调度模型[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(2):202-211.
[23] 迟菲,陈安.突发事件耦合机理与应对策略研究[J].中国安全科报,2014,24(2):171-176.
[24] 孙壮珍,宋伟.新媒体时代地方政府应对群体性突发事件策略解析——基于耦合演化机理模型[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2014,30(1):129-133.
[25] 许尧.群体性事件中主观因素对冲突升级的影响分析[J].中国行政管理,2013,(11):26-29.
[26] 张新文,张国磊.预防式环境群体性事件发生原因探究[J].长白学刊,2013,(6):64-68.
[27] 郭翔,张艾荣.气象灾害事件耦合动力机制研究[J].软科学,2012,26(11):67-69.
[28] 陈贵梧.地方政府创新过程中正式与非正式政治耦合研究——以公安微博为例[J].公共管理学报,2014,11(2):60-69,141-42.
[29] 王伟,靖继鹏,魏仲航.基于复杂特性分析的危机信息流及其动力机制研究[J].情报杂志,2007,(10):105-106,110.
[30] 牛文元,叶文虎.全面构建中国社会稳定预警系统[J].中国发展,2003,(4):5-8.
[31] Heath J. Crisis management for executives: the definitive handbook to corpo-rate rescue in crisis situations[J]. Financial Times Prentice Hall, 1998.
[32] 2017诺贝尔经济学奖得主理查德·塞勒的理论贡献[EB/OL]. 2017-10-12http://www.sohu.com/a/197429549_166202

污染类邻避冲突事件共力耦合演化机理研究——基于耦合协调度模型

Research on the Co-Coupling Evolution Mechanism of Pollution NIMBY Conflict Events-Based on Coupling Coordination Degree Model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics