Research on Knowledge Sharing and Evolutionary Game of Industrial Technology Alliance Considering Risk

doi:10.12005/orms.2018.0254

Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 36-42.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2018.0254

• Theory Analysis and Methodology Study • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on Knowledge Sharing and Evolutionary Game of Industrial Technology Alliance Considering Risk

WU Jie¹, CHEN Lu¹, SHENG Yong-xiang^1,2, CHE Xiao-jing¹ and SHI Qin-fen³

1.School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China;
2.Service Manufacturing Model and Information Research Center, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China;
3.Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China

Received:2018-05-01 Online:2018-11-25

考虑风险的产业技术联盟知识共享演化博弈研究

吴洁¹,陈璐¹,盛永祥^1,2,车晓静¹,施琴芬³

1.江苏科技大学经济管理学院,镇江江苏 212003;
2.江苏科技大学服务制造模式与信息化研究中心,镇江江苏 212003;
3.苏州科技大学,苏州江苏 215009

作者简介:吴洁(1968-),女,江苏滨海人,教授,博士,研究方向:知识管理,技术创新;陈璐(1994-),女,甘肃庆阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向:知识管理;盛永祥,男,1969年,教授,博士,研究方向:复杂网络;车晓静(1992-),女,山西晋城人,硕士研究生,研究方向:知识管理;施琴芬,1963-),女,江苏江阴人,研究员,博士,通讯作者,研究方向:知识管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71771161);国家社科基金重点项目(14AGL001);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目(2018SJZDI053);江苏省社科基金项目(17JYB004);江苏省高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(2015JDXM025)

Abstract

Abstract: Knowledge sharing is an important way to improve the performance of industrial technology alliance. Considering the difference of risk preference among members of the industrial technology alliance, the risk factors of members and the benefit of knowledge sharing are introduced. This paper constructs an evolutionary game model based on the non-linear relationship between risk factors and knowledge sharing benefits, and obtains the equilibrium solution of the evolutionary game. Based on the case study of TD industry alliance, the effects of risk factors, income distribution coefficient and other factors on knowledge sharing intention are simulated. The results show that the willingness of the members to share is very sensitive to the change of the distribution coefficient; the sharing of risk factors and knowledge has a great influence on the willingness of alliance members to share.

Key words: industry technology alliance, risk factor, knowledge sharing, evolutionary game

摘要： 知识共享是促进产业技术联盟绩效增长的重要途径。考虑产业技术联盟成员风险偏好的差异性,引入成员风险因子与知识共享收益因素,构建基于风险因子和知识共享收益非线性关系的演化博弈支付矩阵,并求得博弈的均衡解。通过TD产业联盟的案例分析,仿真模拟风险因子、收益分配系数等因素对知识共享意愿的影响。研究结果表明:联盟成员的共享意愿对收益分配系数的变化非常敏感;风险因子和知识共享程度对联盟成员的共享意愿影响较大。

关键词: 产业技术联盟, 风险因子, 知识共享, 演化博弈

CLC Number:

G302

WU Jie, CHEN Lu, SHENG Yong-xiang, CHE Xiao-jing and SHI Qin-fen. Research on Knowledge Sharing and Evolutionary Game of Industrial Technology Alliance Considering Risk[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(11): 36-42.

吴洁,陈璐,盛永祥,车晓静,施琴芬. 考虑风险的产业技术联盟知识共享演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(11): 36-42.

References

[1] 王胜光, 冯海红. 产业技术联盟内涵及其发展背景研究——基于中关村产业技术联盟发展现状[J]. 科技与管理, 2007, 9(6):1-3.
[2] 樊治平, 欧伟, 冯博, 孙永洪. 组织知识共享能力的测评与识别方法[J]. 科研管理, 2008, 29(2):61-66.
[3] 张长征, 蒋晓荣, 徐海波. 组织设计对知识共享的影响研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(3):128-133.
[4] 傅建华, 张莉, 程仲鸣. 产品替代程度、知识共享与企业合作R&D[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1):1-8.
[5] 储节旺, 吴川徽. 知识流动视角下社会化网络的知识协同作用研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(2):31-36.
[6] 李广培, 吴金华. 个体视角的绿色创新行为路径——知识共享的调节效应[J]. 软科学, 2017, 31(3):9-15.
[7] 倪国栋, 杜斌, 张利忠, 李琨, 李宗波. 知识共享环境对项目成员知识共享活动的影响机制[J]. 软科学, 2017, 31(2):56-60.
[8] Panahi S, Watson J, Partridge H. Towards tacit knowledge sharing over social web tools[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2013, 17(3):379-397. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-11-2012-0364.
[9] 龙跃, 顾新, 张莉. 产业技术创新联盟知识共享的两阶段博弈分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(20):69-75.
[10] 王瑞花. 创新组织内知识共享的演化博弈[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(4):31-38.
[11] 陈萍, 彭文成. 强关系与弱关系下企业网络中的知识共享进化博弈分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(4):28-31.
[12] 肖汉杰, 彭定洪, 桑秀丽. 企业协同创新中知识共享的三角模糊矩阵博弈分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015, 35(24):132-136.
[13] Ho S P, Hsu Y, Lin E. Model for knowledge-sharing strategies: a game theory analysis[J]. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2011, 1(1):53-65. DOI: 10.1080/21573727.2010. 549610.
[14] 商淑秀, 张再生. 虚拟企业知识共享演化博弈分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2015(3):150-157.
[15] 张薷. 基于信任水平下的虚拟社区用户知识共享行为演化博弈分析[J]. 现代情报, 2014, 34(5):161-165.
[16] 张华. 协同创新、知识溢出的演化博弈机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(2):92-99.
[17] 张敏, 郑伟伟, 石光莲. 虚拟学术社区知识共享主体博弈分析——基于信任的视角[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 34(2):55-58.

Research on Knowledge Sharing and Evolutionary Game of Industrial Technology Alliance Considering Risk

考虑风险的产业技术联盟知识共享演化博弈研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	XU jie, CHEN fu-jian, LIU guo-ping. Research on the Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model of Government, Enterprises and Travelers under the Carbon Tax Policy for Motor Vehicle [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(9): 9-16.
[2]	XUE Lei, DAI Da-shuang. Study of an Evolutionary Game between Shipyards and Suppliers about Product Quality [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(9): 17-24.
[3]	WEN Dan-hui, MENG Si-hui, DING Shou-hong. A Non-homogeneous Evolutionary Game Research on Mobile Source Pollution Regulation [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(9): 158-163.
[4]	LI Wan-hong, LI Na, LIU Fang. Three Parties' Evolutionary Game of Stakeholders in Green Technology Innovation and Their Simulation [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(9): 216-224.
[5]	WANG Xian-jia, GU Cuil-ing, ZHAO Jin-hua, QUAN Ji. Evolutionary Game Dynamics of Moran Process with Fuzzy Payoffs [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(7): 71-76.
[6]	FU Xiao-yong, ZHU Qing-hua, TIAN Yi-hui. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Dissembling Enterprises Based on The System Dynamics [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(7): 83-88.
[7]	LIU Yan-hai, BAO Guo-xian. The Evolutionary Game Model in the Construction of Local Government Power List Based on the Third Party Supervision [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(7): 95-101.
[8]	XIONG Qiang, YANG Xin-qi, LI Zhi-wen. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Multi Participant Behavior Strategy of Network Security Vulnerability Information Disclosure [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(7): 102-109.
[9]	ZHOU Zhi-gang, RUAN Li-juan, DING Qiu-kai. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Cross-organizational Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Enterprise Innovation Network [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(6): 83-90.
[10]	LIU Xiao-li, YANG Hong. Game Analysis of Cooperation Mechanism between Farmers and E-commerce Enterprises of Agricultural productsfrom the Perspective of Relational Contract [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(6): 96-102.
[11]	YANG Kun, WANG Wan, HU Bin. Research on Evolutionary Game and Diffusion Mechanism of Responsible Innovation from the Perspective of Life Cycle [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(6): 103-110.
[12]	YANG Su, LIN Hao-dong. Analysis of the Evolution of Emergency Management of Public Engineering Projects Considering Public Participation [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(5): 95-101.
[13]	JING Yi, DU Peng-qi, CAO Liu. Evolutionary Game on Trust among Local Governments in Collaborative Governance of Regional Air Pollution [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(5): 110-115.
[14]	LIU Guo-wei, SHAO Yun-fei. Study on the Financial Support Mechanism and T-S Evolutionary Game of the Strategic Emerging Industries [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(4): 87-95.
[15]	WU Jun-min, TANG Xi, SHENG Yong-xiang, WEI Xiao-zhuo, MAO Xiang-yu. Research on the Collaborative Innovation Mechanism among the Government, Enterprises and Universities in the Post-subsidy Era of New Energy Automobiles Based on Tripartite Evolutionary Game Theory [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(4): 96-102.