Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 158-164.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0398

• Application Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic Evaluation of Development of Regional Technology Effective Supply Based on Catastrophe Progression ——Perspective of Fuzzy Incentives and Punishments

ZENG Xiao-chun1, LI Sui-cheng1,GAO Kun2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, University of Technology, Xi'an 710000; China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2019-09-25 Online:2021-12-25

基于突变级数的我国区域技术有效供给发展状况动态评价——模糊奖惩特征的视角

曾小春1, 李随成1, 高琨2   

  1. 1.西安理工大学 经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710000;
    2哈尔滨工程大学 经济管理学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150001
  • 作者简介:曾小春(1988-),男,讲师,湖北黄冈人,博士研究生,研究方向:综合评价,创新管理;李随成(1962-),男,教授,河南孟州人,博士生导师 研究方向:供应链管理;高琨 (1995-),女,黑龙江牡丹江人,博士研究生,研究方向:创新管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71872148);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(19YJA630015)

Abstract: The development of technology effective supply is different in different regions and different time periods, given corresponding incentives and punishments. How to determine the boundary between incentives and punishments is especially important. Considering the feelings of incentives and punishments and adopting a fuzzy boundary between incentives and punishments, this paper is used by the perspective of fuzzy incentives and punishments. Firstly, the static evaluation is based on catastrophe progression, establishing an evaluation index system for the technology effective supply in regions. Secondly, the dynamic evaluation model of regional technology effective supply is established based on the perspective of fuzzy incentives and punishments. Using the sample of 30 provinces in China from 2013 to 2018, the empirical study shows that areas with high static evaluation values are subject to large incentives, and areas with low static evaluations are subject to large punishments. This paper reflects the difference of development about the effective technology supply in different regions, while the dynamic evaluation results show that there are big differences. Comparing static results to dynamic results, this paper implements fuzzy incentives and punishments, achieves incentives and punishments, which blurs the boundary between incentives and punishments, compensates for the limitations of the clear boundary of incentive and punishment in actual regional economic development, and reflects the flexibility of regional technology effective supply development.

Key words: dynamic evaluation, technology effective supply, catastrophe progression, fuzzy incentives and punishments

摘要: 不同时间不同区域技术有效供给发展状况各不相同,对其不同的发展状况进行相应的激励与惩罚。而如何确定激励与惩罚的界限显得尤为重要,考虑被评价对象的奖惩感受,采用模糊化的奖惩界限,从模糊奖惩特征的视角进行研究。首先建立区域技术有效供给发展状况的评价指标体系,基于突变级数法对其进行静态评价,其次以模糊奖惩特征的视角建立区域技术有效供给发展状况的动态评价模型,运用我国2013~2018年30个省区样本进行实证研究,结果表明:静态评价值高的区域受到奖励的幅度大,静态评价值高的区域受到惩罚的幅度大;反映了不同区域技术有效供给的发展状况各不相同,静态评价结果显示差异小,而动态评价结果显示差异较大;静态结果与动态结果比较分析,实行模糊奖惩,做到奖优罚劣,对奖惩的界限模糊化,弥补了清楚的奖惩界限在实际区域经济发展中的局限性,反映了区域技术有效供给发展的灵活性及柔性。

关键词: 动态评价, 技术有效供给, 突变级数法, 模糊奖惩特征

CLC Number: