The Optimization Degree Evaluation of Energy Structure Base on the SPA-TOPSIS

doi:10.12005/orms.2018.0264

Abstract

Abstract: The energy problem is not only related to political stability and social development, but also the basic impetus of economic growth. Energy structure plays an important role in regional low carbon economic development and environmental protection. The energy structure optimization in different regions of China is different. It is very important to analyze the causes of regional differences to improve the level of energy structure optimization in China. On the base of low-carbon energy development, this paper puts forward three dimensions, which are social and economic development, energy planning and environment. This study focuses on the factors of each dimension, constructs the evaluation index system of energy structure optimization degree, and evaluates the regional Energy structure optimization degree. The weight of the index is determined by using modified PSO algorithm. Based on the connectedness in the SPA method, the evaluation model of energy structure optimization using SPA-TOPSIS method is constructed. This paper builds the model to evaluate China’s 30 provinces and municipalities, and illustrates the rationality of the method. The empirical result shows that it is a good way to use ameliorated PSO algorithm to determine the weight of the energy structure optimization degree index. The proportion of clean energy consumption, the proportion of raw coal consumption and dust emission has a significant impact on the optimization of energy structure. The energy planning and environmental conditions have a significant impact on the evaluation of energy structure optimization degree. There are significant differences in energy structure optimization in different regions of China. The energy structure optimization of the East China is better than that of the West China.

Key words: energy structure, low carbonization, modified PSO algorithm, SPA-TOPSIS, evaluation

摘要： 以能源低碳化发展为基础,从社会经济发展程度、能源规划合理程度、环境和谐程度三个准则层入手,构建能源结构优化程度评价指标体系。运用改进惯性权重的PSO算法确定评价体系权重,并基于SPA-TOPSIS法构建能源结构优化程度评价模型,对30个省、自治区、直辖市的区域能源结构优化程度进行实证研究。实证结果表明:区域社会经济发展水平对能源结构优化程度有直接影响,且各区域能源结构优化程度差异较大,总体呈现“东高西低”的格局;清洁能源消费占比、原煤消费占比、烟尘排放等因素对能源结构优化程度影响显著。

关键词: 能源结构, 低碳化, 改进PSO算法, SPA-TOPSIS, 评价

CLC Number:

F206

Meng Fan-sheng, Zou Yun. The Optimization Degree Evaluation of Energy Structure Base on the SPA-TOPSIS[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(11): 122-130.

孟凡生,邹韵. 基于SPA-TOPSIS方法的能源结构优化程度评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(11): 122-130.

References

[1] Scheer H. The solar economy:Renewable energy for a sustainable global future[M]. London:Routledge,2013.
[2] 魏巍贤,马喜立.能源结构调整与雾霾治理的最优政策选择[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(7):6-14.
[3] 梁琳琳,卢启程.基于碳夹点分析的中国能源结构优化研究[J].资源科学,2015,37(2):291-298.
[4] 孟超,胡健.基于BP神经网络的中国煤炭安全评价研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(8):153-160.
[5] 杜祥琬.能源革命:为了可持续发展的未来[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(7):1-4.
[6] 吴冲,万翔宇.基于改进熵权法的区间直觉模糊TOPSIS方法[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(5):42-47.
[7] 于丹,张兰,张彩虹.基于熵权TOPSIS的林木生物质能源区域发展潜力的评价研究[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,15(3):50-55.
[8] 吴小翠,周兵兵,朱继业.我国中部地区能源消费省域差异的多层次分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(S2):357-361.
[9] 梁昌勇,戚筱雯,丁勇,冷亚军.一种基于TOPSIS的混合型多属性群决策方法[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(4):109-117.
[10] 华小义,谭景信.基于“垂面”距离的TOPSIS法——正交投影法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(1):114-119.
[11] 陆伟锋,唐厚兴.关于多属性决策TOPSIS方法的一种综合改进[J].统计与决策,2012,(19):38-40.
[12] 徐泽水.一种基于目标贴近度的多目标决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,21(9):101-103.
[13] 郭凯,慈兆程.基于ETFEE指数的中国区域结构能源效率的实证研究[J].宏观经济研究,2014,(10):99-107+159.
[14] 张优智,党兴华.我国的能源消费与经济增长:1980~2011——基于非线性STR模型的实证分析[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(6):162-174.
[15] 邵庆龙.中国经济增长与三个产业能源消耗的结构调整[J].科研管理,2017,38(1):127-136.
[16] 林伯强,姚昕,刘希颖.节能和碳排放约束下的中国能源结构战略调整[J].中国社会科学,2010,(1):58-71+222.
[17] 闫晓霞,张金锁,邹绍辉.我国可耗竭能源资源最优开采模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,(9):81-90.
[18] Tang C F,Tan E C. Exploring the nexus of electricity consumption,economic growth,energy prices and technology innovation in Malaysia[J]. Applied Energy, 2013,104:297-305.
[19] Burke P J,Shahiduzzaman M,Stern D I. Carbon dioxide emissions in the short run:The rate and sources of economic growth matter[J]. Global Environmental Change,2015,33:109-121.
[20] 陈正.基于经济增长与能源消费关系的中国能源消费预测[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,41(5):65-70.
[21] 董锋,谭清美,周德群,李晓晖.技术进步、产业结构和对外开放程度对中国能源消费量的影响——基于灰色关联分析-协整检验两步法的实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(06):22-27.
[22] 马立平,陈首丽.产业结构变化对我国能源消费的动态冲击分析[J].统计与决策,2010,(4):117-119.
[23] Shahiduzzaman M.,Layton A.,Alam K. Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emissions in Australia:Challenges and policy implications[J].Economic Analysis & Policy,2015,45:110-111.
[24] Ozturk M,Yuksel Y E. Energy structure of Turkey for sustainable development[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2016,53:1259-1272.
[25] 苗韧,周伏秋,胡秀莲,等.中国能源可持续发展综合评价研究[J].中国软科学,2013(4):17-25.
[26] 公维凤,王传会,周德群,等.能耗强度与能源结构优化对内生经济增长影响研究[J].运筹与管理,2013(3):115-121.
[27] 高新才,罗捷茹.区域能源消费水平的评价指标及影响因素分析[J].宏观经济研究,2011,(6):83-89.
[28] 林伯强,李江龙.环境治理约束下的中国能源结构转变——基于煤炭和二氧化碳峰值的分析[J].中国社会科学,2015(9):84-107.
[29] 许珊,范德成,王韶华.基于最优评价方法的我国能源结构低碳评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(5):186-192.
[30] 葛虹,郭玉伟,韩伟一.绿色发展与环境治理有效性的评价方法研究——两阶段非径向方向距离函数法[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(5):142-150.
[31] 李自林,李志华,葛一洪,邱凌.西北能源生态模式环境效益评价指标体系研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(1):167-174.
[32] 汪克亮,孟祥瑞,杨宝臣,程云鹤.技术异质下中国大气污染排放效率的区域差异与影响因素[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(1):101-110.
[33] Alfi A. PSO with Adaptive Mutation and Inertia Weight and Its Application in Parameter Estimation of Dynamic Systems [J]. Acta Automatica Sinica,2011,37(5):541-549.
[34] 赵克勤.集对分析及其初步应用[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,2000.