不确定偏好序信息下考虑主体心理行为的双边匹配决策方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0053

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 113-120.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0053

不确定偏好序信息下考虑主体心理行为的双边匹配决策方法

乐琦¹, 张磊², 张莉莉³

1.江西财经大学信息管理学院,江西南昌 330013;
2.北京交通大学经济管理学院,北京 100044;
3.辽宁科技大学工商管理学院,辽宁鞍山 114051

收稿日期:2013-05-20 出版日期:2015-04-12
作者简介:乐琦(1983-),男,江西东乡人,江西财经大学信息管理学院讲师,博士,研究方向:管理决策分析与运筹学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71261007,71261006,71361021)

Decision Method for Two-sided Matching Considering Agents’ Psychological Behavior with Uncertain Preference Ordinal Information

YUE Qi¹, ZHANG Lei², ZHANG Li-li³

1.School of Information Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China;
2.School of Economics & Management, Beijing Jiaotong Uinversity, Beijing 100044, China;
3.School of Business Administration, Liaoning Science and Technology University, Anshan 114051, China

Received:2013-05-20 Online:2015-04-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对基于不确定偏好序信息的双边匹配问题,本文提出了一种决策方法。给出了双边匹配和不确定偏好序的相关概念,同时给出了不确定偏好序信息下考虑主体心理行为的双边匹配问题描述;以每个主体给出的临界值作为其参照点,计算了每个主体给出的不确定偏好序相对于参照点的收益或损失;考虑到主体损失规避的心理行为特征,依据TODIM思想计算每个主体对另一方主体的益损值的感知价值;在此基础上,构建了求解该双边匹配问题的双目标优化模型,使用线性加权法将双目标优化模型转化为单目标优化模型,通过求解该单目标优化模型获得匹配结果;最后,通过IT服务外包中的供给方与需求方的双边匹配实例分析说明了所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 管理科学, 双边匹配, 不确定偏好序, 心理行为, TODIM, 感知价值, 优化模型

Abstract: With regard to the two-sided matching problem based on uncertain preference ordinal information, a decision method is proposed. The related concepts of two-sided matching and uncertain preference ordinal are firstly introduced, and the problem description of two-sided matching considering agents’ psychological behavior with uncertain preference ordinal information is given. Secondly, the threshold value given by each agent is chosen as the reference point, and the gain and loss relative to the reference point corresponding to the uncertain preference ordinal given by each agent are calculated. Considering trait of loss aversion of the agent’s psychological behavior, the perceived value of gain and loss of each agent with respect to the agent of the other side is calculated according to the idea of TODIM. Furthermore, a bi-objective optimization model is developed. By using linear weighted method, the bi-objective optimization model is converted into a single objective model. The matching result is obtained by solving the model. Finally, an illustrative example of two-sided matching between demanders and suppliers in IT service outsourcing is used to illustrate the validity of the proposed method.

Key words: management science, two-sided matching, uncertain preference ordinal, psychological behavior, TODIM, perceived value, optimization model

中图分类号:

C931

乐琦, 张磊, 张莉莉. 不确定偏好序信息下考虑主体心理行为的双边匹配决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(2): 113-120.

YUE Qi, ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Li-li. Decision Method for Two-sided Matching Considering Agents’ Psychological Behavior with Uncertain Preference Ordinal Information[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(2): 113-120.

参考文献

[1] Eeckhout J. On the uniqueness of stable marriage matchings[J]. Economics Letters, 2000, 69(1): 1-11.
[2] Jung J J, Jo G S. Brokerage between buyer and seller agents using constraint satisfaction problem models[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 211(4): 293-304.
[3] Goodman S A, Svyantek D J. Person-organization fit and contextual performance: do shared value matter[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1999, 55(2): 254–275.
[4] Pais J. Random matching in the college admissions problem[J]. Economic Theory, 2008, 35(1), 99-116.
[5] 陈林,朱卫平.基于二手市场与理性预期的房地产市场机制研究[J].管理科学学报,2011,14(2):61-100.
[6] Srensen M. How smart is smart money? a two-sided matching model of venture capital[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(6): 2725-2762.
[7] Roth A E. On the allocation of residents to rural hospitals: a general property of two-sides matching markets[J]. Econometrica, 1986, 54(2): 425-427.
[8] Irving R W, Manlove D F, Scott S. Strong stability in the hospitals/residents problem[J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003, 2607(1): 439-450.
[9] Ehlers L. Truncation strategies in matching markets[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2008, 33(2): 327-335.
[10] Alkan A. On preferences over subsets and the lattice structure of stable matchings[J]. Review of Economic Design, 2001, 6(1): 99-111.
[11] Sethuraman J, Teo C P, Qian L. Many-to-one stable matching: geometry and fairness[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2006, 31(3): 581-596.
[12] Knoblauch V. Marriage matching and gender satisfaction[J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2009, 32(1): 15-27.
[13] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[14] 乐琦,樊治平.基于累积前景理论的双边匹配决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2013,28(1):38-46.
[15] 乐琦,樊治平.一种具有序值信息的双边匹配决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2012,27(2):150-159.
[16] 乐琦,樊治平.具有不确定偏好序信息的双边匹配决策问题研究[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(1):57-63.
[17] Fan Z P, Yue Q, Feng B, et al. An approach to group decision-making with uncertain preference ordinals[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 58(1): 51-57.
[18] Chip H, Richard P L, Wu G. Goals as reference points[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1999, 38(1): 79-109.
[19] Gomes L F A M, Lima M M P P. TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts[J]. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 1992, 16(4): 113-127.
[20] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, 106(4): 1039-1061.

不确定偏好序信息下考虑主体心理行为的双边匹配决策方法

Decision Method for Two-sided Matching Considering Agents’ Psychological Behavior with Uncertain Preference Ordinal Information

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	丁肇炜, 杨建华, 王艾, 王欣. 面向突发事件的安保巡逻选址-路径优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 1-6.
[2]	马咏, 何正文, 江波, 王能民. 一种求解柔性资源约束前摄性项目调度问题的启发式算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 14-20.
[3]	杨华龙, 于泽涛, 辛禹辰. 考虑横向整合战略的库存路径动态区域定价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 153-161.
[4]	胡文发, 何新华. 绿色建筑前期设计阶段的多目标优化及多属性决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 44-49.
[5]	付小勇, 朱庆华, 田一辉. 基于系统动力学的政府和废旧电子产品处理商演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 83-88.
[6]	李清水, 李登峰, 李辉, 余高锋. 基于前景理论的区域绿色经济发展水平多指标评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 118-123.
[7]	张莉莉, 马丹妮, 娄媛. 基于优势的双边匹配决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 50-56.
[8]	尉迟群丽, 何正文, 王能民. 考虑缺货的闭环供应链选址-库存-路径集成优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 53-60.
[9]	锁立赛, 姚建明, 周佳辉. 引入整合风险的服务集成商模式农村末端物流资源整合[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 61-67.
[10]	乐琦, 朱加贵. 基于三角直觉模糊数信息的双边匹配决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 57-62.
[11]	刘丽, 张再生, 王哲. 基于双边匹配-动态博弈的碳减排技术投资决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 20-26.
[12]	谭德庆, 徐浩. 基于前景理论的环境污染群体事件演化均衡分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 161-170.
[13]	刘桔, 杨琴, 周永务, 曹策俊. 面向师生感知满意度的双边匹配决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 16-26.
[14]	张笛, 戴红军, 刘晓瑞. 考虑后悔规避与匹配意愿的直觉模糊双边匹配方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 132-139.
[15]	张强, 王丽亚, 耿娜, 江志斌. 政府监管下的医院医疗信息分享演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 23-31.