差异化竞争下考虑再制造专利许可的闭环供应链生产决策

doi:10.12005/orms.2018.0112

运筹与管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 66-74.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2018.0112

差异化竞争下考虑再制造专利许可的闭环供应链生产决策

刘志^1,2, 李帮义¹, 汪磊³, 唐娟¹

1.南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京 210016;
2.安徽工程大学管理工程学院,安徽芜湖 241000;
3.合肥工业大学管理学院,安徽合肥 230009

收稿日期:2016-07-19 出版日期:2018-05-25
作者简介:刘志(1985-),男,讲师,博士研究生,从事物流与供应链管理等研究;李帮义(1963-),男,教授,博导,从事供应链建模与优化、委托代理理论等研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(13AZD062);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171002, 71671001, 71771002);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(NP2016303);安徽高校人文社会科学研究重点项目(SK2017A0122)

Closed-loop Supply Chain Production Decision Considering Remanufacturing Patent Licensing under Differentiation Competition

LIU Zhi^1,2, LI Bang-yi¹, WANG Lei³, TANG Juan¹

1.College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
2.College of Management Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China;
3.College of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2016-07-19 Online:2018-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对高端产品和低端产品的差异化竞争,构建高端制造商将再制造专利许可作为外部竞争要素情形的闭环供应链竞合决策模型,研究消费者异质需求下再制造专利许可对闭环供应链生产决策、利润和环境效益的影响。研究结果表明:再制造专利许可是高端制造商的有效产品差异化竞争策略,可提高高端制造商利润,降低低端制造商利润;再制造专利许可策略对环境并不总是有利的,但消费者对再制造品的支付意愿越强,其环境效益越高。

关键词: 再制造, 差异化竞争, 专利许可, 消费者异质需求

Abstract: For high-end products and low-end product differentiation competition, the closed-loop supply chain co-opetition decision-making model is constructed, in which the high-end manufacturer views remanufacturing patent licensing as external factors of competition. The model can be used to explore the effects of remanufacturing patent licensing on production decisions, economic benefits and environmental benefits of the closed-loop supply chain under consumer heterogeneous demands. The results show that for the high-end manufacturer, the remanufacturing patent licensing is proven as an effective differentiation competition strategy, which increases the profit of the high-end manufacturer and reduces the profit of the low-end manufacturer. In addition, the effect of remanufacturing patent licensing strategy on the environment is not always positive. However, the more consumers are willing to pay for the remanufactured product, the higher environmental benefits the remanufacturing patent licensing strategy will bring.

Key words: remanufacturing, differentiation competition, patent licensing, consumer heterogeneous demand

中图分类号:

F253

刘志, 李帮义, 汪磊, 唐娟. 差异化竞争下考虑再制造专利许可的闭环供应链生产决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(5): 66-74.

LIU Zhi, LI Bang-yi, WANG Lei, TANG Juan. Closed-loop Supply Chain Production Decision Considering Remanufacturing Patent Licensing under Differentiation Competition[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(5): 66-74.

参考文献

[1]Xiao T, Xu T. Pricing and product line strategy in a supply chain with risk-averse players[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 156: 305-315.
[2]Xiong Y, Zhou Y, Li G, et al. Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 230(1): 15-25.
[3]Subramanian R, Ferguson M E, Toktay L B. Remanufacturing and the component commonality decision[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2013, 22(1): 36-53.
[4]申成然,熊中楷,彭志强.专利保护与政府补贴下再制造闭环供应链的决策和协调[J].管理工程学报,2013,27(3):132-138.
[5]公彦德,达庆利.不同物流模式下的再制造补贴机制和供应链稳定性研究[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(1):140-146.
[6]Li Y, Niu S, Zhao X, et al. Effect of EPR coefficient policy on the production decision in precious metal accessory recycling[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(4): 1129-1146.
[7]李响,李勇建.多再制造商回收定价竞争博弈[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(2):72-76.
[8]张曙红,初叶萍.考虑政府约束的再制造闭环供应链差别定价博弈模型[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(3):119-126.
[9]Ferrer G, Swaminathan J M. Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 203(2): 370-379.
[10]Debo L G, Toktay L B, Wassenhove L N V. Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(8): 1193-1205.
[11]Gu W, Chhajed D, Petruzzi N C, et al. Quality design and environmental implications of green consumerism in remanufacturing[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 162: 55-69.
[12]Shi J, Zhang G, Sha J. Optimal production and pricing policy for a closed loop system[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2011, 55(6):639-647.
[13]王玉燕,申亮.基于消费者需求差异和渠道权力结构差异的MT-CLSC定价、效率与协调研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(6):34-42.
[14]Wu C H. OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(2): 287-298.
[15]Örsdemir A, Kemahlogˇlu-Ziya E, Parlaktürk A K. Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(1): 48-64.
[16]Oraiopoulos N, Ferguson M E, Toktay L B. Relicensing as a secondary market strategy[J]. Management Science, 2012, 58(5): 1022-1037.
[17]Ferrer G, Swaminathan J M. Managing new and remanufactured products[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1): 15-26.
[18]Atasu A, Sarvary M, Van Wassenhove L N. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(10): 1731-1746.
[19]李帮义.作为阻止战略的再制造决策研究[J].控制与决策,2010,25(11):1675-1678.
[20]伍颖,熊中楷.竞争条件下制造商和再制造商的生产决策[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(2):291-303.
[21]Jung K S, Hwang H. Competition and cooperation in a remanufacturing system with take-back requirement[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2011, 22(3): 427-433.
[22]熊中楷,申成然,彭志强.专利保护下闭环供应链的再制造策略研究[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(3):159-165.
[23]易余胤,阳小栋.不同专利许可模式下的再制造闭环供应链模型[J].计算机集成制造系统,2014,20(09):2305-2312.
[24]王建明.专利保护下再制造闭环供应链差别定价与协调研究[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(3):89-96.
[25]Moorthy K S. Product and price competition in a duopoly[J]. Marketing Science, 1988, 7(2): 141-168.
[26]Atasu A, Souza G C. How does product recovery affect quality choice?[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2013, 22(4): 991-1010.

差异化竞争下考虑再制造专利许可的闭环供应链生产决策

Closed-loop Supply Chain Production Decision Considering Remanufacturing Patent Licensing under Differentiation Competition

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈玉玉, 李帮义, 王哲, 王玥. 差异化定价策略下政府规制对生产者尽规模式选择的影响[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 147-153.
[2]	张克勇, 李江鑫, 姚建明, 李春霞. 零售商采购资金约束下第三方再制造闭环供应链决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 26-32.
[3]	欧阳恋群, 黄帝, 丁建勋. 环境税费政策下快递包装材料回收利用的最优决策及社会福利分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 54-60.
[4]	袁文榜. 专利池形成中的厂商数量门槛值因素分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 199-203.
[5]	夏西强, 朱庆华. 授权再制造视角下再制造设计对制造再制造影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 212-217.
[6]	狄卫民, 徐文君, 夏西强. 基于经销商再制造的闭环供应链政府补贴策略及效果分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 102-109.
[7]	付帅帅, 陈伟达, 丁军飞, 王丹丹. 考虑不同融资金额需求的授权再制造融资策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 213-219.
[8]	杨丽, 李帮义, 徐广姝. 生产者对回收责任约束的参与意愿——强制性与自愿性的形成机理及驱动因素分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 229-235.
[9]	黄少辉, 袁开福, 何波, 程伟丽. 考虑废旧品质量的闭环供应链混合回收渠道选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 104-111.
[10]	丁锋, 陈军, 陈超, 霍佳震. 基于差异化战略的跨境电商竞争策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 33-40.
[11]	黄燕婷, 王宗军. 技术许可下信息分享和政府补贴对闭环供应链的影响分析——基于经销商再制造模式[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 57-66.
[12]	高更君, 罗瑶. 不确定环境下再制造生产调度研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(11): 185-190.
[13]	牛水叶, 李勇建. 再制造供应链“投保策略”运营模式研究:谁应来投“产品质量保险”？[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(1): 46-53.
[14]	郭金森,周永务,任鸣鸣,海本禄. 基于风险厌恶零售商的双渠道闭环供应链运作策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(8): 32-40.
[15]	刘东霞, 陈红. 二手市场对耐用品垄断厂商再制造决策的影响分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(7): 102-110.