运筹与管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 157-167.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2018.0122

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

区域差异化制度设计下的碳排放交易市场效率评价

杨越, 成力为   

  1. 大连理工大学 管理与经济学部,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-08 出版日期:2018-05-25
  • 作者简介:杨越(1987-)女,黑龙江牡丹江人,经济系统分析与管理专业博士研究生,研究方向:能源经济、区域经济;成力为(1960-),通讯作者,女,湖南津市人,金融学教授,博士生导师,研究方向:国际金融理论与政策研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71473025);辽宁哲学社会科学规划基金项目(20171s1ktyb-040);辽宁哲学社会科学规划基金项目(L16AJL002)

Evaluation of Carbon Emissions Trading Market Efficiency under Differentiation System Design

YANG Yue, CHENG Li-wei   

  1. Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • Received:2016-09-08 Online:2018-05-25

摘要: 本文依据中国碳排放交易试点阶段“差异化”制度设计的特点,基于分配制度、灵活机制、控排范围、交易规则、报告与核查制度以及法律制度六个维度,构建可数据化的碳交易市场投入产出效率评价指标体系。本文利用地区差异系数剔除制度外非均衡环境因素的影响,对现有试点地区差异化制度设计下的碳排放交易市场效率进行有效评价。研究表明:第一,较没有剔除制度外因素,上海、天津和北京3个省市碳交易市场效率有所下降,而其余4个省区投入产出效率则上升,说明碳交易市场效率确实受制度外因素的影响,同时说明探讨碳交易市场差异化制度设计有效性时,控制制度外因素干扰的必要性和合理性。第二,就制度设计本身,七个试点碳交易市场均未达到有效。广东碳排放交易市场效率最优,仅控排行业覆盖比例设计过低;重庆和天津的效率紧随其后,上海、深圳和北京的效率较低;而湖北由于控排范围设计不合理、准入门槛过高、MRV从业人员严重短缺等原因导致其交易市场效率最差。

关键词: 碳排放交易, 效率评价, 差异系数

Abstract: According to China’s carbon emission trading pilot phase “difference” system design features, we build the digital input-output efficiency evaluation index system of carbon trading market from six aspects such as distribution system, flexible mechanism, control range, trading rules, report and verification system, and legal system. To control the unbalanced external environment impact on efficiency, measuring the difference coefficient of different pilot areas, the purpose is to modify data output indexes. The measure of the pilot areas carbon trading market efficiency suggests that: First, after stripping out outside the system, carbon trading market efficiency of Shanghai, Tianjin and Beijing three provinces declined, while the remaining four provinces input-output efficiency increased. We illustrate the rationality of differentiation system design which can effectively correct the external environment of regional carbon trading market efficiency influence. We also discuss the design effectiveness of the carbon trading market differentiation system, control system factors of necessity and reasonableness. Second, the system design itself of seven pilot carbon trading market has not been effective. Guangdong has the optimal efficiency only charged with low percentage of industry control range design. The efficiency of Chongqing and Tianjin is low, followed by Shanghai, Shenzhen and Beijing. Due to the unreasonable scope design, high barriers to entry, a serious shortage of MRV workers, Hubei has the worst market efficiency.

Key words: carbon emission trading, efficiency evaluation, differentiation

中图分类号: