基于前景理论的两阶段DEA交叉效率评价模型

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0349

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 53-59.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0349

基于前景理论的两阶段DEA交叉效率评价模型

吴辉, 昂胜, 杨锋

中国科学技术大学管理学院,安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2019-11-22 出版日期:2021-11-25
通讯作者: 昂胜 (1987-),男,安徽肥东人,副教授,研究方向:评价理论与决策、供应链管理。
作者简介:吴辉 (1994-),男,安徽寿县人,硕士研究生,研究方向:数据包络分析;杨锋(1977-),男,湖北武汉人,教授,博士生导师。研究方向:决策方法与应用、供应链与运作管理、数据分析。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71601173,71631006,71991464/71991460,71921001)

Two-stage DEA Cross-efficiency Evaluation Model Based on Prospect Theory

WU Hui, ANG Sheng, YANG Feng

School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2019-11-22 Online:2021-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对两阶段系统交叉效率值不唯一的问题,现有解决方法大多假设决策者完全理性,忽略了决策者心理因素对评价过程的影响。本文构建以平均值为新的参考点,分别在集中和分散决策环境下建立基于前景理论的两阶段DEA交叉效率评价模型,通过实际算例验证模型的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 数据包络分析(DEA), 交叉效率评价, 前景理论, 两阶段DEA

Abstract: Existing researches assume that the decision makers are completely rational and ignore the influence of decision makers' psychological factors on the evaluation, when addressing the non-uniqueness issue of the cross-efficiency for two-stage systems. This study uses the average value to construct new references for two-stage systems, and then proposes a two-stage DEA cross-efficiency model based on prospect theory in both the centralized and the decentralized decision-making environments. An example illustrates the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: data envelopment analysis(DEA), cross-efficiency evaluation, prospect theory, two-stage DEA

中图分类号:

F224.31

吴辉, 昂胜, 杨锋. 基于前景理论的两阶段DEA交叉效率评价模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 53-59.

WU Hui, ANG Sheng, YANG Feng. Two-stage DEA Cross-efficiency Evaluation Model Based on Prospect Theory[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(11): 53-59.

参考文献

[1] Doyle J, Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45(5): 567-578.
[2] Yang F, Ang S, Xia Q, et al. Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 223(2): 483-488.
[3] Liang L, Wu J, Cook W D, et al. The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium[J]. Operations Research, 2008, 56(5): 1278-1288.
[4] Liu H, Song Y, Yang G. Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 273(1): 364-375.l
[5] Tone K, Tsutsui M. Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach[J]. European journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(1): 243-252.
[6] Liang L, Cook W D, Zhu J. DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition[J]. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 2008, 55(7): 643-653.
[7] Kao C. Network data envelopment analysis: a review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 239(1): 1-16.
[8] Kao C, Liu S T. Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems[J]. Omega, 2019, 83: 70-79.
[9] Örkcü H H, Özsoy V S, Örkcü M, et al. A neutral cross efficiency approach for basic two stage production systems[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 125: 333-344.
[10] 赵萌,骆冬嬴,释海璋,李子超.考虑风险偏好的IVTFS多属性群决策方法[J].控制工程,2018,25(08):1516-1521.
[11] Chronopoulos M, De Reyck B, Siddiqui A. Optimal investment under operational flexibility, risk aversion, and uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 213(1): 221-237.
[12] 邵芳,朱永香.非理性投资误导下股票定价对投资行为的影响——兼论多重因素的调节作用[J].财会通讯,2019(11):8-12.
[13] Fan J P H, Wong T J, Zhang T. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 84(2): 330-357.

[1]	李清水, 李登峰, 李辉, 余高锋. 基于前景理论的区域绿色经济发展水平多指标评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 118-123.
[2]	罗公利, 郭延禄, 侯贵生. 山寨危机和道德危机视角下的网红店铺行为规制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 224-231.
[3]	林珊珊, 余高锋. 基于在线评论和前景效用的商品等级评价及选择方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 191-195.
[4]	刘超, 汤国林, 刘培德. 基于模糊测度与累积前景理论的区间二型模糊多准则决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 70-81.
[5]	胡礼梅, 谭春桥. 考虑损失厌恶型顾客的产品推荐方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 150-156.
[6]	王世磊, 屈绍建, 刘志敏, 马刚. 基于前景理论的混合不确定情景下在线多属性反向拍卖的赢者确定方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 187-197.
[7]	谭德庆, 徐浩. 基于前景理论的环境污染群体事件演化均衡分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 161-170.
[8]	刘桔, 杨琴, 周永务, 曹策俊. 面向师生感知满意度的双边匹配决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 16-26.
[9]	姜金贵, 张琦, 沈丹薇, 宋艳. 社会化媒体环境下不可辩解型产品伤害危机演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 17-25.
[10]	王娟, 金智新, 邓存宝, 方博. 基于前景理论的三角犹豫模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 26-33.
[11]	李玉, 吴斌, 王超. 基于前景理论的众包物流配送方行为决策演化博弈分析——基于发货方视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 129-135.
[12]	范德成,李盛楠. 区域高技术产业技术创新效率测度与提升路径研究——基于共享投入关联型两阶段DEA模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 156-165.
[13]	莫国莉, 张卫国, 刘芳, 余星. 基于前景云的不确定语言多准则国际股指投资群决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 126-138.
[14]	陈伟, 林超然, 李金秋, 杨早立, 林艳. 前景理论视角下专利代理服务模式优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 14-24.
[15]	郭茜, 张静, 吴刚, 付焯. 基于模糊结构元的技术创新项目中止决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 22-28.

基于前景理论的两阶段DEA交叉效率评价模型

Two-stage DEA Cross-efficiency Evaluation Model Based on Prospect Theory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics