制造业技术创新效率评价模型及其应用研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2016.0027

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从技术创新系统的内部过程出发,将制造业技术创新过程划分为技术研究与开发、技术应用与改造、环境污染治理三个阶段;然后运用虚拟系统法构建出制造业三阶段链式网络DEA交叉效率评价模型,并利用熵值法来确定交叉效率矩阵中各决策单元的权重,再通过加权求和法计算最终评价值;最后将此模型应用于福建省制造业技术创新效率的评价中。研究表明,福建省制造业各行业的技术创新效率,无论是整个技术创新系统,还是技术创新系统的各个子阶段,其交叉效率值普遍偏低,具有较大的提升空间。

关键词: 制造业, 技术创新效率评价, 网络DEA, 交叉效率, 熵值法

Abstract: Based on the internal process of technology innovation system,the technology innovation process of manufacturing industry is divided into three stages: technology research and development, technology application and transformation as well as environmental pollution control. And then the virtual system method is introduced to construct series network DEA cross-evaluation model. In addition, we apply the entropy method to determine the weight of each decision-making unit in the cross efficiency matrix, and adopt the weighted sum method to compute the final evaluation value. Finally, this model is applied to evaluate the technology innovation efficiency of manufacturing industry in Fujian province. The research suggests that the technology innovation cross efficiency values of manufacturing industry in Fujian province are generally low, including the overall cross efficiency and cross efficiencies of three sub-stages. Therefore there is still much room for improving the efficiencies.

Key words: manufacturing industries, technology innovation efficiency evaluation, network DEA, cross efficiency, entropy approach

中图分类号:

F223

向小东, 陈丽芬. 制造业技术创新效率评价模型及其应用研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(1): 215-223.

XIANG Xiao-dong, CHEN Li-fen. Research on Technology Innovation Efficiency Evaluation Model of Manufacturing Industries and Its Application[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(1): 215-223.

参考文献

[1] 邹鲜红.我国医药制造业技术创新效率及其影响因素研究[D].湖南:中南大学,2010.
[2] 项本武.中国工业行业技术创新效率研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(1):10-15.
[3] 王伟.基于改进DEA的中国高技术产业技术创新效率研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(7):119-125.
[4] 郭磊,刘志迎,周志翔.基于DEA交叉效率模型的区域技术创新效率评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(11):138-142.
[5] 戴卓,代红梅.中国工业行业的技术创新效率研究—基于随机前沿模型[J].经济经纬,2012,(4):90-95.
[6] 刘金芳,徐枞巍.基于DEA-Malmquist的内资工业企业动态创新效率分析[J].系统工程,2012,30(4):67-75
.[7] Lee H Y, Park Y T. An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2005, 13(2): 207-222.
[8] Luis D B, Herruzo A C, Margarita M, Jacinto G P. An analysis of productive efficiency and innovation activity using DEA: an application to spain’s wood-based industry[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2006, 8(7): 762-773.
[9] Wang E C, Huang W C. Relative efficiency of R&D activities: across-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(2): 260-273.
[10] Akihiro H, Shoko H. Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(10): 1829-1836.
[11] Sharma S, Thomas V J. Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: application of data envelopment analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(3): 483-501.
[12] Toshiyuki S, Mika G. Can R&D expenditure avoid corporate bankruptcy? comparison between japanese machinery and electric equipment industries using DEA-discriminant analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(1): 289-311.
[13] Aye G C, Mungatana E D. Technological innovation and efficiency in the nigerian maize sector: parametric stochastic and non-parametric distance function approaches[J]. Agrekon, 2011, 50(4): 1-24.
[14] Astrid C, Jens S E, Petra Z. Innovation, R&D efficiency and the impact of the regulatory environment-a two stage semi-parametric DEA approach[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 2012, 64(1): 1-30.
[15] Aristovnik A. The relative efficiency of education and R&D expenditures in the new EU member states[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2012, 13(5): 832- 848.
[16] Astrid C, Jens S E, Petra Z. R&D efficiency and barriers to entry: a two stage semi-parametric DEA approach[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 2012, 64(1): 176-196.
[17] 吴贵生.技术创新管理:中国企业自主创新之路[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2011.1-26.
[18] 杨锋,梁樑,毕功兵,杜少甫.一类树形生产系统的DEA效率评价研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2009,31(5):1128-1132.
[19] 荆浩,赵希男.DEA中交叉效率评价的新思考[J].运筹与管理,2008,17(3):46-51.
[20] 吴杰,梁樑.一种考虑所有权重信息的区间交叉效率排序方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2008,30(10):1890-1895.
[21] Dominique G, Bruno V P. From R&D to productivity growth: do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2004, 66(3): 353-378.
[22] Dyson R G, Allena R, Camanhob A S, Podinovskia V V, Sarricoa C S, Shalea E A. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 132(2): 245-259.