基于云模型-灰色关联分析的云平台军民融合创新方案评价研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0227

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 154-159.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0227

基于云模型-灰色关联分析的云平台军民融合创新方案评价研究

徐建中¹, 翟佳琦¹

哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2019-06-06 出版日期:2021-07-25
作者简介:徐建中(1959-),男,河北省丰润县人,教授、博士生导师,研究方向为军民融合可持续发展、现代管理理论与方法;翟佳琦( 1993-),女,黑龙江双鸭山人,满族,博士研究生,主要研究方向为军民融合可持续发展、现代管理理论与方法、绿色创新。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金应急项目(71841054);工业和信息化部项目(19GZY411);黑龙江省经济社会发展重点研究课题(19023)

Evaluation of Civil-Military Integration Innovation Scheme Based on Cloud Model-Grey Relational Analysis under Cloud Platform

XU Jian-zhong¹, ZHAI Jia-qi

School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

Received:2019-06-06 Online:2021-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了客观地评价云平台下军民融合创新方案,考虑到各评价指标间的相互影响关系和信息随机性的问题,本文从创新环境、创新管理、创新投入和创新产出四方面分析了影响军民融合创新的关键因素,构建出云平台军民融合创新方案的评价体系,并采用云模型法来表示评价信息以实现定性信息与定量值间的转换。运用熵值法和DEMATEL法来计算上述评价信息的综合权重,同时根据云的距离测度和灰色关联分析法确定了各个融合方案与理想方案的相似度。最后通过实例对不同融合方案进行分析,并将其结果与精确数值方法进行对比,验证了本方法的正确性及有效性,说明此方法可以为决策者选择创新方案提供参考价值,并能为军民融合创新方案的评价提供客观的理论依据。

关键词: 云模型, DEMATEL-熵值法, 军民融合, 灰色关联分析, 创新方案评价

Abstract: In order to objectively evaluate the military civilian integration innovation scheme under the cloud platform, considering the interaction between the evaluation indexes and the randomness of information, this paper analyzes the key factors influencing the military civilian integration innovation from four aspects of innovation environment, innovation management, innovation input and innovation output. The evaluation system of military civilian integration innovation scheme of cloud platform is constructed, and the cloud model method is used to express the evaluation information to realize the transformation between qualitative information and quantitative value. The entropy method and DEMATEL method are used to calculate the comprehensive weight of the above evaluation information, and the similarity between each scheme and the ideal scheme is determined according to the distance measure of cloud and the grey correlation analysis method. Finally, through the analysis of different schemes and the comparison of the results with the accurate numerical method, the correctness and effectiveness of this method are verified, which shows that this method can provide reference value for decision makers to choose innovative schemes and provide objective theoretical basis for the evaluation of civil military integration innovative schemes.

Key words: cloud Model, DEMATEL-Entropy method, civil-military integration, grey relational analysis, innovation scheme evaluation

中图分类号:

N945

徐建中, 翟佳琦. 基于云模型-灰色关联分析的云平台军民融合创新方案评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 154-159.

XU Jian-zhong, ZHAI Jia-qi. Evaluation of Civil-Military Integration Innovation Scheme Based on Cloud Model-Grey Relational Analysis under Cloud Platform[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(7): 154-159.

参考文献

[1] 杨志坚.协同视角下的军民融合路径研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(4):99-102.
[2] Xiao P. Analysis on the development trend of enterprise information management under the background of data and internet[J]. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, 2017(ssme).
[3] Chen G, Yu M. China’s joint military and civilian development[J]. East Asian Policy, 2017, 9(02): 26-33.
[4] Yu Y, Gu X, Chen Y. Research on the technology transfer efficiency evaluation in industry-university-research institution coll-aborative innovation and its affecting factors based on the two-stage DEA model[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Springer, Singapore, 2017. 237-249.
[5] 杜人淮,郭玮.国防工业军民融合效益评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(16):106-111.
[6] 刘静,王燕.航天军工企业军民融合水平评价研究[J].内江科技,2014,35(9):76-77.
[7] 马宇飞.基于资源军民融合视角的国防工业军民融合研究[J].财讯,2016(11):62-63.
[8] 魏华兴.军工集团军民融合发展评价体系研究[J].现代经济信息,2018(11):20-23.
[9] 谭清美,王斌,王子龙,等.军民融合产业创新平台及其运行机制研究[J].现代经济探讨,2014(10):62-64.
[10] 董晓辉,张莹.军民融合科技服务机构运行模式与政策启示[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(1):131-135.
[11] Li M, Du W, Feng Q, et al. Total plant performance evaluation based on big data: visualization analysis of TE process[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(8):S1004954117313186.
[12] Simhadri S K. Evaluation of maximum entropy method of spectrum estimation[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2018.
[13] Li H, Zhang X, Ng S T, et al. Quantifying stakeholder influence in decision/evaluations relating to sustainable construction in china – a delphi approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018: S0959652617308818.
[14] 冯静.美国武器装备科研生产军民融合的主要做法[J].军民两用技术与产品,2018,419(21):10-13.
[15] 付骆婷.基于知识转移的军民融合技术协同创新模式与评价研究[D].西南科技大学,2017.
[16] 李文辉,刘旭东,熊湘辉,等.军民技术整合效果评价体系构建与测度方法研究——以西安市军民技术整合为例[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(1):62-65.
[17] Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3): 3000-3011.
[18] Chang T C, Wang H. A multi criteria group decision-making nodel for teacher evaluation in higher education based on cloud model and decision tree[J]. Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016, 12(5).
[19] Xia X, Sun Y, Wu K, et al. Optimization of a straw ring-die briquetting process combined analytic hierarchy process and grey correlation analysis method[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 152: 303-309.

基于云模型-灰色关联分析的云平台军民融合创新方案评价研究

Evaluation of Civil-Military Integration Innovation Scheme Based on Cloud Model-Grey Relational Analysis under Cloud Platform

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	黄辉, 梁星, 李梦想, 张娟. 应急物资联合配送决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 48-54.
[2]	胡东滨, 谢玲. 基于云模型和证据推理的生态环境安全评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 130-136.
[3]	刘国栋, 朱建军, 刘小弟. 基于灰色关联度-云模型的群评价数据质量改进方法及应用研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 144-150.
[4]	张芳, 蔡建峰. 基于政府支持的军民合作技术创新演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 8-15.
[5]	郭韬, 王淞, 李盼盼, 郭喆. 军民融合视角下中国船舶工业上市公司创新能力评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 114-120.
[6]	方炜, 郑立明. 军民融合企业技术转移效率区域差异及影响因素研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 1-11.
[7]	曹霞, 邢泽宇, 张路蓬. 政府推动下的军民融合深度发展协同创新模式研究-以西安市为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 10-18.
[8]	刘勇, 杜俊良, 赵焕焕. 基于灰色关联模型的高校R&D影响因素分析与时滞测度[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 150-156.
[9]	赵金辉, 王学慧, 关文革, 尹立杰, 周玉. 基于模糊信息公理与云模型的虚拟企业合作伙伴选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 202-208.
[10]	方炜, 王婵, 李正锋. 演化博弈视角下军民融合协同创新合作稳定性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 15-26.
[11]	莫国莉, 张卫国, 刘芳, 余星. 基于前景云的不确定语言多准则国际股指投资群决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 126-138.
[12]	张璐, 李巨韬, 赵艳云, 田正清. 基于用户感性需求的产品设计方案评估方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(1): 152-157.
[13]	李存斌, 张磊, 马原. 基于云模型和VIKOR扩展方法的电网企业科技发展区间值多属性群决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 63-69.
[14]	王翯华, 朱建军, 杨萍. 大型客机协同研制工艺技术风险的正态云模型评估[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 146-153.
[15]	贾书伟, 严广乐. 基于灵敏性分析的Q-MSGSID的优化及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(4): 105-111.