基于混合产品提供的后市场知识共享激励机制设计研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0134

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 198-206.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0134

基于混合产品提供的后市场知识共享激励机制设计研究

罗建强^1,2, 胡炳坤¹

1.江苏大学管理学院,江苏镇江 212013;
2.江苏大学中国农业装备产业发展研究院,江苏镇江 212013

收稿日期:2018-10-29 出版日期:2020-05-25
作者简介:通讯作者:罗建强(1973-),男,陕西扶风人,博士、教授,博士生导师,研究方向:生产/服务运作管理;胡炳坤(1993-),男,江苏淮安人,硕士研究生,研究方向:混合产品知识管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71772080,71472077);2018江苏省研究生科研创新计划资助项目(KYCX18-2212)

Research on the Design of Post-market Knowledge Sharing Incentive Mechanism Based on Hybrid Offerings

LUO Jian-qiang^1,2, HU Bing-kun¹

1. School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;
2. Institute for China's Agricultural Equipment Industrial Development, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

Received:2018-10-29 Online:2020-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 制造企业对混合产品专有知识出于盈利与保护目的封锁行为,将使得供需之间产生知识缺口。在厘清缺口形成原因的基础上,分别构建了不同信息条件及不同风险偏好下的供需知识共享激励模型。研究结果表明:在信息对称的条件下,供需双方可达到帕累托最优,客户可通过买断知识产权或建立知识联盟共享企业混合产品的专有知识;而信息不对称的情形下,制造企业采取知识授权的形式进行共享,客户提高收益分配比例对保护性知识的共享边际作用递增,而对盈利性知识的共享边际作用保持不变;考虑知识泄露的风险,仿真发现制造企业愿意承担的风险比例对保护性知识的共享成本系数的敏感性要高于盈利性知识。

关键词: 混合产品, 知识缺口, 知识共享, 激励机制

Abstract: The blockade of manufacturing enterprises' proprietary knowledge of hybrid offerings for profit and protection purposes will create a knowledge gap between supply and demand. On the basis of clarifying the reasons for the knowledge gap, this paper constructs the model of supply and demand knowledge sharing incentive mechanism under different information conditions and different risk preferences. This result shows that the supply and demand can reach the Pareto optimal under the condition of symmetric market information, and the customers can share the knowledge of hybrid offerings by buying out intellectual property or building knowledge alliances. In the case of asymmetric market information, manufacturing enterprises often share knowledge in the form of knowledge authorization. The increase in the proportion of income distribution of the manufacturing enterprises by the customer can increase the marginal effect of the sharing of protective knowledge, but the marginal effect of the sharing of profitable knowledge remains unchanged. Considering the risk of knowledge leakage, the numerical analysis shows that the proportion of risk that the manufacturing enterprises is willing to bear is more sensitive to the shared cost coefficient of protective knowledge than the profitable knowledge.

Key words: hybrid offerings, knowledge gaps, knowledge sharing, incentive mechanism

中图分类号:

F062.3

罗建强, 胡炳坤. 基于混合产品提供的后市场知识共享激励机制设计研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 198-206.

LUO Jian-qiang, HU Bing-kun. Research on the Design of Post-market Knowledge Sharing Incentive Mechanism Based on Hybrid Offerings[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(5): 198-206.

参考文献

[1] 罗建强,赵艳萍,彭永涛.基于TRIZ的制造企业服务衍生研究[J].管理评论,2016,28(5):35-46.
[2] Shankar V, Berry L L, Dotzel T. A practical guide to combining products and services[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2009, 87(11): 94-99.
[3] Ulaga W, Reinartz W J. Hybrid offerings: how manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2011, 75(6): 5-23.
[4] Roster C A, Rogers M M. Profits and perils in the antiques and collectibles market: the influence of product knowledge structures on dealer exchange outcomes[J]. International Review of Retail Distribution & Consumer Research, 2016, 26(1): 1-16.
[5] 袁立科,韩秋明.知识产权限制对中国制造技术追赶的影响研究[J].经济问题探索,2017,(6):39-45.
[6] 吴洁,陈璐,盛永祥,等.考虑风险的产业技术联盟知识共享演化博弈研究[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(11):36-42.
[7] 孟庆良,徐信辉.知识获取视角下用户持续参与众包创新的动态控制策略[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(8):190-199.
[8] Sedighi M, Splunter S V, Brazier F, et al. Exploration of multi-layered knowledge sharing participation: the roles of perceived benefits and costs[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2016, 20(6): 1247-1267.
[9] Vandermerwe S, Rada J. Servitization of business: adding value by adding services[J]. European Management Journal, 1988, 6(4): 314-324.
[10] Eloranta V, Turunen T. Seeking competitive advantage with service infusion: a systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2015, 26(3): 394-425.
[11] Fang E, Palmatier R W, Steenkamp J B E M. Effect of service transition strategies on firm value[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72(5): 1-14.
[12] Wallin J, Parida V, Isaksson O. Understanding product-service system innovation capabilities development for manufacturing companies[J]. ournal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2015, 26(5): 763-787.
[13] Kwiatkowski C, Gebauer H, Kamp B, et al. Servitization and deservitization: overview, concepts, and definitions[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017, 60(1): 4-10.
[14] Bustinza O F, Bigdeli A Z, Baines T. Servitization and competitive advantage: the importance of organizational structure and value chain position[J]. Research-Technology Management, 2015, 58(5): 53-60.
[15] 和征,陈菊红.基于产品服务融合的服务型制造企业服务创新方法研究[J].运筹与管理,2015, 24(3):240-247.
[16] 党兴华,任斌全.网络环境下企业技术创新中的知识缺口及其弥补策略研究[J].科研管理,2005,26(3):12-16.
[17] 韩赟,高长元.高技术企业知识缺口弥补流程研究[J].科学学研究,2009,27(9):1370-1375.
[18] 郭京京,周丹,李强.知识属性、技术学习惯例与企业创新绩效:规模的调节效应[J].科研管理,2017,38(12):29-40.
[19] Kwahk K Y, Park D H. The effects of network sharing on knowledge-sharing activities and job performance in enterprise social media environments[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 55: 826-839.
[20] Grabe M E, Bas O, Van Driel I I. Defecting from the gutenberg legacy: employing images to test knowledge gaps[J]. Journal of Communication, 2015, 65(2): 300-319.
[21] 葛宝山,崔月慧.基于社会网络视角的新创企业知识共享模型构建[J].情报科学,2018,36(2):153-158.
[22] Rahman M S, Osmangani A M, Daud N M, et al. Knowledge sharing behaviors among non academic staff of higher learning institutions: attitude, subjective norms and behavioral intention embedded model[J]. Library Review, 2016, 65(1/2): 65-83.
[23] 叶伟巍.激励众包网络化创新的知识产权制度研究[J].管理世界,2017,(6):176-177.
[24] 张旭梅,黄陈宣.逆向供应链企业间知识共享的决策机制研究[J].管理学报,2013,10(2):233-237.
[25] 谢兰云,王维国.我国科技创新体系产出机制的门槛效应研究[J].统计研究,2016,33(2):51-60.
[26] Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10(1): 92-116.

基于混合产品提供的后市场知识共享激励机制设计研究

Research on the Design of Post-market Knowledge Sharing Incentive Mechanism Based on Hybrid Offerings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	苏强, 陈淼. 基于委托代理理论的医疗激励契约研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 203-209.
[2]	周志刚, 阮丽娟, 丁秋楷. 企业创新网络中跨组织知识共享行为的演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 83-90.
[3]	罗建强, 胡炳坤, 李洪波. 面向混合产品生成的客户知识均衡及有效边界识别研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 218-225.
[4]	张一林, 马慧民. 基于演化博弈论的环卫自律组织激励机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 115-121.
[5]	杨红, 彭灿, 李瑞雪, 杨晓娜, 吕潮林. 变革型领导、知识共享与研发团队创造力:团队成员异质性的倒U型调节作用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 217-224.
[6]	马永红, 刘海礁, 柳清. 产业集群协同创新知识共享策略的微分博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 82-88.
[7]	姚慧丽, 毛翔宇, 金辉. 考虑平台影响因素的虚拟社区知识共享演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 82-88.
[8]	朱宾欣, 马志强, LEONWilliams. 考虑声誉效应的众包竞赛动态激励机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 116-123.
[9]	王瑞花,吕永波. 师徒制知识共享敌意的演化趋势研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 182-189.
[10]	韩莹, 陈国宏. 基于不同网络层次的集群企业知识共享演化分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(9): 139-147.
[11]	余建军, 郑小欢, 黄小泳, 朱强强. 基于委托代理理论的“公司+农户”租赁模式分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 179-185.
[12]	王小龙, 李文立. 信息安全遵从行为的激励机制研究——惩罚的确定性与适度性[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(3): 133-142.
[13]	吴洁,陈璐,盛永祥,车晓静,施琴芬. 考虑风险的产业技术联盟知识共享演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(11): 36-42.
[14]	林润辉, 米捷. 知识共享与间接互惠:基于计算实验方法的研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(9): 157-165.
[15]	孙世敏, 吴倩, 张林玉, 王艳梅. 考虑长短期努力的过度自信代理人激励机制[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(8): 174-186.